Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Clinical Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PM), Post-polycythemia Vera (PV) Myelofibrosis, or Post-essential Thrombocythemia (ET) Myelofibrosis (NCT NCT02087059)
NCT ID: NCT02087059
Last Updated: 2016-07-11
Results Overview
COMPLETED
PHASE3
51 participants
24 weeks
2016-07-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice daily at the starting dose of 5 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg bid based on Baseline platelet counts. The dosage was subsequently adjusted for safety and efficacy so that each patient was titrated to their most appropriate dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
51
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
44
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice daily at the starting dose of 5 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg bid based on Baseline platelet counts. The dosage was subsequently adjusted for safety and efficacy so that each patient was titrated to their most appropriate dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Disease Progression
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Clinical Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PM), Post-polycythemia Vera (PV) Myelofibrosis, or Post-essential Thrombocythemia (ET) Myelofibrosis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=51 Participants
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice daily at the starting dose of 5 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg bid based on Baseline platelet counts. The dosage was subsequently adjusted for safety and efficacy so that each patient was titrated to their most appropriate dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=51 Participants
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice daily at the starting dose of 5 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg bid based on Baseline platelet counts. The dosage was subsequently adjusted for safety and efficacy so that each patient was titrated to their most appropriate dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
AEs requiring reduction or interruption treatment
|
38 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
AEs requiring concomitant medication
|
33 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
AEs, regardless of study treatment relationship
|
50 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
AEs suspected to be related to study treatment
|
46 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
SAEs, regardless of study treatment relationship
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
SAEs suspected to be related to study treatment
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
AEs of CTC grade 3/4, regardless study treatment
|
36 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
AEs of CTC grade 3/4 suspected related treatment
|
33 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
AEs leading to the study treatment discontinuation
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeksNumber of patients with spleen length reduced by ≥ 50% at specified week
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=51 Participants
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice daily at the starting dose of 5 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg bid based on Baseline platelet counts. The dosage was subsequently adjusted for safety and efficacy so that each patient was titrated to their most appropriate dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline at Specified Week
Week 2
|
12 particiapants
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline at Specified Week
Week 4
|
14 particiapants
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline at Specified Week
Week 8
|
14 particiapants
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline at Specified Week
Week 16
|
14 particiapants
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline at Specified Week
Week 20
|
13 particiapants
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline at Specified Week
Week 24
|
15 particiapants
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline at Specified Week
Week 12
|
11 particiapants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeksNumber of patients with spleen length reduced by ≥ 50% up to specified week
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=51 Participants
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice daily at the starting dose of 5 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg bid based on Baseline platelet counts. The dosage was subsequently adjusted for safety and efficacy so that each patient was titrated to their most appropriate dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline up to the Specified Week
Week 4
|
18 particiapants
Interval 13.1 to 38.2
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline up to the Specified Week
Week 8
|
22 particiapants
Interval 16.2 to 42.5
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline up to the Specified Week
Week 12
|
23 particiapants
Interval 16.2 to 42.5
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline up to the Specified Week
Week 16
|
26 particiapants
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline up to the Specified Week
Week 20
|
26 particiapants
|
|
Charge in Spleen Size From Baseline up to the Specified Week
Week 24
|
26 particiapants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksThe modified MFSAF v2.0 diary captures a patient's symptom severity on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable),with a maximal summary score of 60
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=51 Participants
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice daily at the starting dose of 5 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg bid based on Baseline platelet counts. The dosage was subsequently adjusted for safety and efficacy so that each patient was titrated to their most appropriate dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Night Sweats baseline (n=51)
|
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.07
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Night Sweats week 24 (n=43)
|
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Itching baseline (n=51)
|
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Itching week 24 (n=43
|
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Abdominal Discomfort baseline( n=51)
|
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.18
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Abdominal Discomfort week 24(n=43)
|
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Pain under ribs on left Baseline (=51)
|
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.72
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Pain under ribs on left week 24 (=43)
|
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Total symptom score week 24 (n=43)
|
5.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.48
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Feeling of fullness Baseline (n=51)
|
3.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.91
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Feeling of fullness week 24 (n=43)
|
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Bone/muscle pain Baseline (n=51)
|
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Bone/muscle pain week 24 (n=43)
|
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Degree of inactivity Baseline (n=51)
|
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Degree of inactivity week 24 (n=43)
|
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
|
Summary of Total Symptom Score as Measured by Seven-day Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 by Time
Total symptom score baseline (n=51)
|
16.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.30
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: FAS
The QLQ-C30 version 1.0 (QLQ-C30) incorporates five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), a global health status / QoL scale, and a number of single items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnoea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation and diarrhea) and perceived financial impact of the disease.All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=51 Participants
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice daily at the starting dose of 5 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg bid based on Baseline platelet counts. The dosage was subsequently adjusted for safety and efficacy so that each patient was titrated to their most appropriate dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Physical Functioning baseline
|
79.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.951
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Physical Functioning 24(n=43)
|
86.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.959
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Role Functioning Baseline(n=51)
|
77.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.254
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Role Functioning Week 24(n=43)
|
83.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.068
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Emotional Functioning Baseline(n=51)
|
85.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.705
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Emotional Functioning Week 24(n=43)
|
92.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.357
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Cognitive Functioning Baseline(n=51)
|
78.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.356
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Cognitive Functioning week 24 (n=43)
|
79.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.653
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Social Functioning Baseline (n=51)
|
85.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.154
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Social Functioning week 24(n=43)
|
87.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.852
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Global Health Status/QOL Baseline (n=51)
|
55.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.882
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Global Health Status/QOL week 24 (n=43)
|
66.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.456
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Fatigue Baseline(n=51)
|
40.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.787
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Fatigue week 24 (n=43)
|
28.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.412
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Nausea and Vomiting baseline (n=51)
|
4.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.862
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Nausea and Vomiting week 24 (n=43)
|
0.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.542
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Pain Baseline
|
21.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.678
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Pain week 24 (n=43)
|
10.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.911
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Dyspnoea baseline (n=51)
|
22.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.377
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Dyspnoea Week 24 (n=43)
|
25.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.946
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Insomnia baseline (n=51)
|
23.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.283
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Insomnia Week 24 (n=43)
|
15.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.400
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Appetite Lose baseline (n=51)
|
21.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.787
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Appetite Lose Week 24 (n=43)
|
9.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.786
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Constipation baseline (n=51)
|
8.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.916
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Constipation Week 24 (n=43)
|
8.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.416
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Diarrhoea baseline (n=51)
|
18.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.325
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Diarrhoea Week 24 (n=43)
|
12.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.029
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Financial Difficulties baseline (n=51)
|
15.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.257
|
|
Summary of Summary of EORTC QLQ-C30 Responses by Time
Financial Difficulties Week 24 (n=43)
|
20.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.012
|
Adverse Events
Ruxolitinib
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=51 participants at risk
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice daily at the starting dose of 5 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg bid based on Baseline platelet counts. The dosage was subsequently adjusted for safety and efficacy so that each patient was titrated to their most appropriate dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal varices haemorrhage
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Drug-induced liver injury
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Infections and infestations
Empyema
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Tumour lysis syndrome
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Withdrawal syndrome
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
2.0%
1/51
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
2.0%
1/51
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=51 participants at risk
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice daily at the starting dose of 5 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg bid based on Baseline platelet counts. The dosage was subsequently adjusted for safety and efficacy so that each patient was titrated to their most appropriate dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
62.7%
32/51
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
5.9%
3/51
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
5.9%
3/51
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
29.4%
15/51
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
7.8%
4/51
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
13.7%
7/51
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
7.8%
4/51
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.9%
3/51
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
5.9%
3/51
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
5.9%
3/51
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
9.8%
5/51
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
11.8%
6/51
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
11.8%
6/51
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
7.8%
4/51
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
9.8%
5/51
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
7.8%
4/51
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
5.9%
3/51
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
23.5%
12/51
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
5.9%
3/51
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
7.8%
4/51
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.9%
3/51
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
5.9%
3/51
|
Additional Information
Clinical Disclosure Office
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (ie, data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER