Trial Outcomes & Findings for Low-dose IL-2( Interleukin-2) Treatment in SLE (NCT NCT02084238)
NCT ID: NCT02084238
Last Updated: 2020-04-03
Results Overview
SRI response was defined as (1) a ≥ 4-point reduction in SELENA-SLEDAI score, (2) no new BILAG A score or ≤ 1 new BILAG B score, and (3) no deterioration from baseline in the physician's global assessment by ≥ 0.3 points.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
week 2,week 4,week 6,week 8,week 10
2020-04-03
Participant Flow
Between August 2013 and May 2014,38 patients completed three cycles of recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2) in Dept. of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital. Patients were permitted changes in background therapy according to the treating physician's advice.
All the patients showed poor efficacy at least 4 weeks of stable routine treatment at the time of enrollment. Two of the enrolled patients withdrew from the study at week 8: one changed to the belimumab treatment by personal preference; the other elected changed to the cyclophosphamide treatment to reduce the frequency of hospital visits.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Interleukin-2
Interleukin-2 to treat activated SLE.
Interleukin-2: Patients receive low dose recombinant human Interleukin-2(HrIL-2) (1 million units every other day subcutaneously (HrIL-2 1X 106, ip, Qod) for a period of 14 days. After a 14-day break, another cycle started) for 3-6 courses according to the situation of the disease.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Interleukin-2
Interleukin-2 to treat activated SLE.
Interleukin-2: Patients receive low dose recombinant human Interleukin-2(HrIL-2) (1 million units every other day subcutaneously (HrIL-2 1X 106, ip, Qod) for a period of 14 days. After a 14-day break, another cycle started) for 3-6 courses according to the situation of the disease.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Low-dose IL-2( Interleukin-2) Treatment in SLE
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Interleukin-2
n=38 Participants
Interleukin-2 to treat activated SLE.
Interleukin-2: Patients receive low dose recombinant human Interleukin-2(HrIL-2) (1 million units every other day subcutaneously (HrIL-2 1X 106, ip, Qod) for a period of 14 days. After a 14-day rest, another cycle started) for 3-6 courses according to the situation of the disease.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
31 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
China
|
38 partiipants
n=5 Participants
|
|
SELENA-SLEDAI score
|
11.35 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.71 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: week 2,week 4,week 6,week 8,week 10SRI response was defined as (1) a ≥ 4-point reduction in SELENA-SLEDAI score, (2) no new BILAG A score or ≤ 1 new BILAG B score, and (3) no deterioration from baseline in the physician's global assessment by ≥ 0.3 points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SRI Results
n=38 Participants
All 38 patients who completed therapy will be calculated the response rate at each visit time point(week 2,4,6,8,10).
|
Immunological Responses 2
Tfh cells in CD4+ T cells in 23 patients with SLE
|
Immunological Responses 3
Th17 in CD4+T cells in 23 patients with SLE
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)
Week 2
|
12 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)
Week4
|
27 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)
Week 6
|
33 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)
week 8
|
34 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)
week 10
|
34 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: week 0 and week 10Population: regulatory CD4+ T (Treg) cells , interleukin 17 (IL-17)-producing helper T (Th17) cells and follicular helper T (Tfh) cells
Analysis regulatory CD4+ T (Treg) cells , interleukin 17 (IL-17)-producing helper T (Th17) cells and follicular helper T (Tfh) cells before and during IL-2 treatment. P values below 0.05 are considered statistically significant in this study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SRI Results
n=23 Participants
All 38 patients who completed therapy will be calculated the response rate at each visit time point(week 2,4,6,8,10).
|
Immunological Responses 2
n=23 Participants
Tfh cells in CD4+ T cells in 23 patients with SLE
|
Immunological Responses 3
n=23 Participants
Th17 in CD4+T cells in 23 patients with SLE
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Immunological Responses
Week 0
|
10.6 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Interval 3.54 to 17.6
|
3.93 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Interval 1.27 to 15.14
|
4.09 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Interval 1.69 to 11.18
|
|
Immunological Responses
Week 10
|
17.5 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Interval 4.76 to 28.2
|
2.1 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Interval 0.69 to 7.55
|
2.63 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Interval 1.24 to 7.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: week 0 and week 10Laboratory measures were detected, including, C3, C4 and anti-dsDNA titres.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SRI Results
n=38 Participants
All 38 patients who completed therapy will be calculated the response rate at each visit time point(week 2,4,6,8,10).
|
Immunological Responses 2
n=38 Participants
Tfh cells in CD4+ T cells in 23 patients with SLE
|
Immunological Responses 3
n=38 Participants
Th17 in CD4+T cells in 23 patients with SLE
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Immunologic Impact of Low Dose IL-2 Treatment in SLE Patients
Week 0
|
0.42 g/L
Interval 0.118 to 1.46
|
0.075 g/L
Interval 0.017 to 0.54
|
417.9 g/L
Interval 10.0 to 3987.5
|
|
The Immunologic Impact of Low Dose IL-2 Treatment in SLE Patients
Week 10
|
0.75 g/L
Interval 0.45 to 1.23
|
0.157 g/L
Interval 0.11 to 0.37
|
105.1 g/L
Interval 17.14 to 2467.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: week 0, week 10Assessment version of the SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) change. The higher the score represent the worse of the disease. The total score ranges from 0 to 105 points, score\> 8 means the disease is moderate-to-severe active".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SRI Results
n=38 Participants
All 38 patients who completed therapy will be calculated the response rate at each visit time point(week 2,4,6,8,10).
|
Immunological Responses 2
Tfh cells in CD4+ T cells in 23 patients with SLE
|
Immunological Responses 3
Th17 in CD4+T cells in 23 patients with SLE
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
SELENA SLEDAI Score
Week 0
|
11.35 score
Standard Deviation 3.71
|
—
|
—
|
|
SELENA SLEDAI Score
Week 10
|
3.775 score
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksRelapses mean that if the patient's SELENA SLEDAI Score is lower than 4 during the treatment, while the SELENA SLEDAI Score increase after stopping using the study drugs in 3 months.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to Day 180Adverse events includes injection site reactions, influenza-like symptoms, infection, fever, tumor, cardiovascular event,drug-induced liver and kidney damage.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
IL-2 Therapy in SLE
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
IL-2 Therapy in SLE
n=38 participants at risk
All enrolled patients completed three cycles of recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2). In each cycle, 1 million IU rhIL-2 was administered subcutaneously every other day for 2 weeks, followed by a 2-week break.
|
|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Injection-site reaction
|
13.2%
5/38 • Number of events 5 • 3 months
No serious adverse events occurred.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
2.6%
1/38 • Number of events 1 • 3 months
No serious adverse events occurred.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
2.6%
1/38 • Number of events 1 • 3 months
No serious adverse events occurred.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place