Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety Study of PDT Using Photofrin in Unresectable Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (OPUS) (NCT NCT02082522)
NCT ID: NCT02082522
Last Updated: 2019-08-28
Results Overview
Time from the date of randomization until the date of death or the last date the subject was known to be alive
TERMINATED
PHASE3
28 participants
Up to 26 months
2019-08-28
Participant Flow
An independent expert panel acted as central assessors for subjects across all sites. Central assessors prospectively interpreted all abdominal CT and cholangiogram images taken at screening to establish the final diagnosis and to confirm the randomization. Central assessors had the authority to overrule the investigator's diagnosis.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
15
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
15
|
13
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Sponsor termination
|
5
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Disease progression
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Chemotherapy change
|
1
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety Study of PDT Using Photofrin in Unresectable Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (OPUS)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=15 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=13 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
Total
n=28 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.84 • n=5 Participants
|
66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.69 • n=7 Participants
|
64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 26 monthsPopulation: All participants randomized (intent-to-treat population)
Time from the date of randomization until the date of death or the last date the subject was known to be alive
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=15 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=13 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival Time
|
444 days
Interval 111.0 to
The value cannot be estimated because less than 50% of patients had a documented death by the time of premature study termination. Only 15 patients were enrolled, most did not complete the study and there was 1 death. Impossible to measure this.
|
387 days
Interval 181.0 to
Value cannot be estimated because \< 50% of patients had a documented death at time of premature study termination. Only 13 subjects were enrolled, most did not complete the study \& there were 0 deaths in the group. Impossible to measure this.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 daysPopulation: Data not collected
From the date of randomization until the date of first documented bilirubin response
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 26 monthsPopulation: Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
From the start of the treatment until disease progression or recurrence the RECIST 1.1 criteria are applied (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=9 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=8 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Overall Tumor Response as Measured by the RECIST 1.1 Criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)
|
56 percentage of participants
|
75 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 26 monthsPopulation: Not collected
From the date of first documented response until the date that tumor progression was assessed
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 7 daysPopulation: At Day 7, all 15 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 9/13 in the SMC Alone group were analysed.
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=15 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=9 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)
|
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.99
|
0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 4 weeksPopulation: At 4 weeks, 12 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 9 in the SMC Alone group were analysed.
The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=12 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=9 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)
|
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.77
|
0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 13 weeksPopulation: At 13 weeks, 8 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 8 in the SMC Alone group were analysed. Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=8 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=8 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.56
|
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 16 weeksPopulation: At 16 weeks, 9 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 9 in the SMC Alone group were analysed. Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=9 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=9 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)
|
-6.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.00
|
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 29 weeksPopulation: At 29 weeks, 6 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 5 in the SMC Alone group were analysed. Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=6 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=5 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.94
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 41 weeksPopulation: At 41 weeks, 2 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 1 in the SMC Alone group was analysed. Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=2 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=1 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)
|
10.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.14
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeksPopulation: At 54 weeks, only 1 subject in each group was measured. Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=1 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=1 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 66 weeksPopulation: Data not collected
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 78 weeksPopulation: Not collected
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 7 daysPopulation: Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=15 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=9 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30)
|
-2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.29
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 4 weeksPopulation: Not collected
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 13 weeksPopulation: Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=7 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=8 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30
|
-7.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.59
|
6.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 16 weeksPopulation: Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=9 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=8 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30
|
-21.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 33.88
|
10.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 31.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 29 weeksPopulation: Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=4 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=5 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30
|
-12.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.03
|
5.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 41 weeksPopulation: Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=2 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=2 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30
|
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.79
|
-16.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeksPopulation: Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis.
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=1 Participants
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=1 Participants
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30
|
-8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Only 1 patient so no SD
|
-33.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Only 1 patient so no SD
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 66 weeksPopulation: No data collected
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 78 weeksPopulation: No data collected
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=15 participants at risk
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=10 participants at risk
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Portal vein thrombosis
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site pain
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post-procedural complications
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
33.3%
5/15 • Number of events 8 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 4 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Liver abcess
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biloma
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
|
40.0%
6/15 • Number of events 6 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
90.0%
9/10 • Number of events 9 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Haemobilia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis cholestatic
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Embolism
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis acute
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC
n=15 participants at risk
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals.
As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
|
Standard Medical Care (SMC)
n=10 participants at risk
Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle tightness
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Asterixis
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hyperaesthesia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Abnormal dreams
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Food aversion
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus bladder
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary congestion
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhea
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccups
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
60.0%
9/15 • Number of events 9 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
46.7%
7/15 • Number of events 7 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
50.0%
5/10 • Number of events 5 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
46.7%
7/15 • Number of events 7 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
40.0%
6/15 • Number of events 6 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 4 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
60.0%
6/10 • Number of events 6 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
26.7%
4/15 • Number of events 4 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
40.0%
4/10 • Number of events 4 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site pain
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Edema peripheral
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis acute
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
40.0%
6/15 • Number of events 6 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokaliemia
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminemia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anemia
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Bilirubine increase
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
CA-19 increase
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
GGT
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
26.7%
4/15 • Number of events 4 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
33.3%
5/15 • Number of events 5 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritis
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Night sweats
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atelectasis
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Chromaturia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Uretherolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
30.0%
3/10 • Number of events 3 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Nausea
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 2 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin cut
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
26.7%
4/15 • Number of events 4 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Aplastic anemia
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenitis
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Splenic infarction
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Splenomegaly
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Eustachian tube dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Adrenal insufficiency
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjuctival hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diplopia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye swelling
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Feces discolored
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
GERD
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal hemorrhage
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site discharge
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site injury
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Generalized edema
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza-like illness
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct obstruction
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Gallbladder perforation
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Portal hypertension
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Biliary tract infection bacteria
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Candida infection
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Catheter site infection
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enterococcal bacteremia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea pedis
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural nausea
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural vomiting
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin wound
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
AST increased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Blood magnesium decreased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium decreased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Hemoglobin decreased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Heart rate increased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
INR increased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Pulse abnormal
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid imbalance
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid overload
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkaliemia
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcemia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesemia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamine D deficiency
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Groin pain
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint stiffness
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillar disorder
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper airway cough syndrome
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
0.00%
0/15 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blister
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Photosensitivity reaction
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritis generalized
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash erythmetous
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Solar lentigo
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Swelling face
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/10 • 26 months
The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60