Effectiveness of the Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine in Military Recruits
NCT ID: NCT02079701
Last Updated: 2014-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
152723 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2000-10-31
2007-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* determining the etiology of clinical pneumonia among U.S. military trainees;
* comparing the serotype distribution of S. pneumoniae (Sp) isolates recovered from vaccinated and nonvaccinated trainees diagnosed with pneumonia; and
* comparing days lost from training due to pneumonia or acute respiratory disease for vaccinated and nonvaccinated subjects.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase Ⅱ Clinical Trial of 24-valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Conjugate Vaccine
NCT07035054
A Trial To Evaluate A Multivalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine In Healthy Adults 50-85 Years Of Age
NCT03313050
PhaseⅠClinical Trial of 24-valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Conjugate Vaccine
NCT07025876
Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of 3 Lots of 20-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Pneumococcal Vaccine-Naïve Adults
NCT03828617
Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Multivalent Pneumococcal Vaccine in Healthy Infants
NCT03512288
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Enrollment and follow-up. This study was approved by multiple Department of Defense (DoD) institutional review boards. Using an informed consent process, basic training recruits at 5 recruit training centers (in South Carolina, Missouri, Illinois, and California) were invited to participate during their first week of training. Pregnancy screening was performed on all women, and those with positive results were not enrolled. Exclusion criteria included having previously received the a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine during the previous 5 years or having a medical condition that either required or precluded pneumococcal vaccination. Study participants completed a study questionnaire and were administered a pre-packaged, blinded, and randomized injection containing either the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals or Merck \& Company, Inc.) or saline in a 1:1 ratio. Study injections were administered at the same time as other recruit in-processing vaccinations, which may have included vaccines against polio, measles-mumps-rubella, varicella, tetanus-diphtheria, hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus, meningococcal disease (A/C/Y/W135), and influenza. At the end of recruit training, a questionnaire was administered to capture symptoms and signs of illnesses which might have been missed captured by the active and passive surveillance.
As enrollment continued for more than two years, the person-year contributions of those first enrolled were greater than those enrolled near the trial's end. The original planned surveillance period was 1.7 years. This was later extended to 6.7 years from enrollment of the first participant, for continued monitoring of impact in this large double-blinded trial.
Specimen collection. During the active surveillance period, study participants with suspect pneumonia were identified by the attending physician. Study personnel obtained three throat swabs, blood cultures (aerobic and anaerobic), sputum sample (if producible), and acute serum samples from participants. Attempts were made to also capture a convalescent serum sample 2 weeks after the acute presentation on all radiographically-confirmed pneumonia cases. These attempts were not always successful. Barriers included: trainee discharge from military service, difficulty in obtaining access to the recruits when they were in field exercises, and recruits graduating and moving to new duty stations.
Laboratory methods. Specimens collected from study participants were examined using classic, molecular, and serologic laboratory methods at the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) Respiratory Disease Laboratory, a College of American Pathologist (CAP) accredited laboratory.
NHRC isolated adenovirus, influenza, parainfluenza, and respiratory syncytial virus from pharyngeal swabs using fluorescent antibody antigen tests. Adenovirus and influenza isolates were typed using standard viral identification techniques.
Sputum specimens were inoculated for Sp culture using standard techniques. When Sp species were identified, capsular serotyping was performed, and standard antimicrobial sensitivities were assessed. Paired acute and convalescent sera were assessed for IgM and IgG titers to pneumolysin. Sera were tested with an enzyme immunoassay using a procedure such as described by Kalin, M, et al.
For Chlamydophila pneumoniae polymerase chain reaction (PCR) study, throat swabs were collected from patients diagnosed with pneumonia, immediately placed in Chlamydia transport media, and transported on ice. The throat swabs were used in a direct PCR method, such as the procedure described by Campbell et al. Amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel by standard methods. Sample preparation, PCR amplification, and analysis of amplification products were performed in separate rooms.
To assess M. pneumoniae, a throat swab was collected and immediately placed into 2.0 ml of M. pneumoniae transport media (SP-4 broth). Culturing, sub-culturing, and molecular testing was performed as per previously published protocols.
Capturing disease outcomes. Outcome measures included any cause pneumonia, any cause respiratory disease, recruit training clinical pneumonia (radiographically-confirmed during the recruit training period), or days lost from training. Active surveillance was conducted for radiographically-confirmed pneumonias only during the recruit training period (Marines-12 weeks, Navy-8 weeks, Army-9 weeks). Passive electronic monitoring of health care encounters for outcomes other than recruit training clinical pneumonia took place during recruit training and at the subsequent duty stations using the DoD comprehensive electronic databases of outpatient healthcare encounters (SADR), inpatient encounters (SIDR), and encounters at civilian facilities billed to the DoD (HCSR). ICD-9-CM codes 480 through -486 and 487 were monitored for these outcomes throughout the entire study period. Meningitis cases (ICD-9-CM codes 320 through -320.2, 320.9, and 322.9) were also captured through these electronic databases.
Statistical analysis. After descriptive investigation of population characteristics, univariate analyses were performed to assess the significance of associations between demographic variables with acute respiratory infection, pneumonia, and radiographically-confirmed pneumonia.
Active surveillance time was calculated from the participant's enrollment date to the projected completion of training, or diagnosis with radiographically-confirmed pneumonia. Passive surveillance was calculated from the date of enrollment to June 01 2007, diagnosis with pneumonia or acute respiratory infection, or separation from active duty service, whichever occurred first.
Using regression diagnostics, collinearity among variables was investigated. Cox's proportional hazard time-to-event modeling was used to evaluate outcomes among study participants, while adjusting for differences in population characteristics between treatment arms and accounting for different enrollment dates and active and passive surveillance periods. The saturated Cox regression model was reduced by a manual backward stepwise elimination approach removing those variables that were insignificant at α = 0.05 level and not confounding the other measures of association. Additionally, cumulative probabilities of outcomes from enrollments through end of follow-up periods were graphed. Statistical modeling to produce adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (Version 9.0, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).
Crude vaccine effectiveness measures for each outcome were calculated for all participants and for each branch of service using a 1-relative risk x 100% estimate.
Days lost from training were estimated using a survey administered at the end of training to a convenience sample of 71,692 study participants. Differences between treatment arms were evaluated using ANOVA.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
23-valent pneumococcal vaccine
single dose, 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, 0.5ml, intramuscular (IM)
23-valent pneumococcal vaccine
randomization, based upon a random-number (block design) double-blind enrollment sequence. 1:1 ratio.
placebo
0.5 ml injectible saline, IM
Placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
23-valent pneumococcal vaccine
randomization, based upon a random-number (block design) double-blind enrollment sequence. 1:1 ratio.
Placebo
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* having previously received the a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine during the previous 5 years or
* having a medical condition that either required or precluded pneumococcal vaccination
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
FED
Naval Health Research Center
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kevin Russell
Director, Respiratory Disease Laboratory (at that time)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin L Russell, MD, MTM&H
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Naval Health Research Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Marine Recruit Training Center
San Diego, California, United States
Naval Recruit Training Center
Great Lakes, Illinois, United States
Army Recruit Training Center
Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, United States
Army Recruit Training Center
Fort Jackson, South Carolina, United States
Marine Recruit Training Center
Parris Island, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Plouffe JF, Breiman RF, Facklam RR. Bacteremia with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Implications for therapy and prevention. Franklin County Pneumonia Study Group. JAMA. 1996 Jan 17;275(3):194-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.275.3.194.
Gray GC, Mitchell BS, Tueller JE, Cross ER, Amundson DE. Pneumonia hospitalizations in the US Navy and Marine Corps: rates and risk factors for 6,522 admissions, 1981-1991. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Apr 15;139(8):793-802. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117076.
McMillan A, Pattman RS. Evaluation of urethral culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the routine investigation of men attending a STD clinic. Br J Vener Dis. 1979 Aug;55(4):271-3. doi: 10.1136/sti.55.4.271.
Gray GC, Callahan JD, Hawksworth AW, Fisher CA, Gaydos JC. Respiratory diseases among U.S. military personnel: countering emerging threats. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999 May-Jun;5(3):379-85. doi: 10.3201/eid0503.990308.
Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA, Meffe F, Sankey SS, Weissfeld LA, Detsky AS, Kapoor WN. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Dec 12-26;154(23):2666-77. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420230051007.
Russell KL, Baker CI, Hansen C, Poland GA, Ryan MA, Merrill MM, Gray GC. Lack of effectiveness of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in reducing all-cause pneumonias among healthy young military recruits: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Vaccine. 2015 Feb 25;33(9):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.058. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DAMD17-00-2-0013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.