Imaging of Adult Burn Injuries

NCT ID: NCT02074787

Last Updated: 2014-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Burn injuries are a common presentation to A\&E in the UK (175,000 per year) of whom 13,000 require hospital admission. Treatment of a single burn can cost more than £63,000, and is ultimately dependent on the depth. Most burns are assessed by experienced clinicians within a few days of injury. Accurate evaluation of burn depth can be very difficult with the naked eye. Inaccuracy can lead to longer hospital stays, worse scarring and greater financial costs for the NHS. Where the burn depth (and the degree of damage to the underlying blood supply of the skin) is not clear by visual inspection, adjuncts may be used to aid clinical decision-making. Currently, the "gold standard" method of assessing skin blood flow in order to help burn specialists in their assessment of burn depth is Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI). However, LDI machines can be very large, slow to collect the images, and a single imaging unit costs roughly £50,000. Consequently their use is restricted to the assessment of small burns in compliant patients treated in specialist units. Thermal imaging (thermography) has evolved rapidly as a useful diagnostic tool in many medical disciplines. Previous studies have shown that there are significant changes in skin physiology (such as temperature and pigmentation) depending on the depth of the burn. Portable, high-resolution thermal cameras are now affordable, easy to use and can provide numerical results in under a second. Similarly, measurement of skin pigment levels can be achieved using portable devices such as the Spectrophotometric Intracutaneous analysis scope (SIAscope). The aim of this study is to determine if alternative measures such as thermography or SIAscope can be as useful in the assessment of adult burns as LDI currently is. If this study demonstrates this then these results will inform further studies that would investigate these alternative imaging methods as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the management of burns not only in adults but also in children presenting to non-specialised units such as A\&E.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Adult acute burn injuries are currently "read" by experienced clinicians at 2-3 days post injury in order to determine the necessary treatment and likely clinical outcome. Adjuncts to this process aim to inform the clinician of structural damage to the sub dermal vasculature. The current gold standard investigation is laser doppler imaging (LDI) of dermal blood flow. However, due to time and resource constraints, this technique is often only applied to dermal burns of indeterminate thickness. Thermography and the SIAscope potential offer quicker, quantitative analysis with equipment currently in routine medical use in other clinical disciplines.

To validate its use against the current gold standard (LDI)burns of variable thicknesses will need to be assessed and compared with clinical outcome. Consequently, in this study, patients with superficial burns that would not usually require LDI will be included for comparison. All patients will be reassured that thermography, the SIAscope and LDI are non-invasive, non-harmful, quick and will not affect their burn management in any way. Images will be labelled by an anonymised study number and stored in on secure hospital servers according to the Trust's information governance policy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thermography Laser Doppler Blood Flow Spectrophotometric Intracutaneous Analysis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Adult burn injuries

Adult patients with burns injuries attending the regional burns unit at Chelsea \& Westminster hospital between 48 and 72 hours post burn will be invited to take part in the study at the time of presentation to the unit.

Thermography

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard thermographic images

Laser Doppler

Intervention Type DEVICE

standard laser doppler analysis

Spectrophotometric Intracutaneous analysis

Intervention Type DEVICE

standard SIA scope imaging

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Thermography

Standard thermographic images

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laser Doppler

standard laser doppler analysis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Spectrophotometric Intracutaneous analysis

standard SIA scope imaging

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

FLIR E50mx Moor systems laser doppler blood flow analysis SIA scope

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adults burn injury within 72 hours of presentation able to undergo all three imaging modalities

Exclusion Criteria

* children patients not consenting
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Royal College of Surgeons of England

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust

London, London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jonathan M Collier, MA MFDS FRCS(OMFS) PHD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 07957 332966

Email: [email protected]

isobel Jones, MA FRCS(Plast)

Role: CONTACT

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

donna mclean

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14/EE/0048

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

141406

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

C&W13/090

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id