To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of (18F-FCH) Comparing With (18F-FDG) for Detecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT02074202

Last Updated: 2014-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Liver cancer is a major cause of death among patients of east or southeast asian descent, as well as other population groups, notably in central and west Africa. Diagnosis of liver cancer requires a combination of several imaging techniques and biopsies. Despite this, diagnosis can remain inconclusive or difficult to establish in patients at risk for liver cancer.

The purpose of this multi-center trial is to evaluate novel imaging methods developed to diagnose the most common form of liver cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma. We propose to use novel imaging probes that have been reported to bind to liver cancers but not benign liver lesions that can be confused with liver cancer. Two such imaging probes will be evaluated. 2-\[18F\]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, called \[18F\]FDG, is a radioactive sugar that is widely used for cancer imaging with a device called positron emission tomography, or PET scans. We already know that \[18F\]FDG cannot detect some liver cancers that are slow growing. \[18F\]Fluorocholine (\[18F\]FCH), another molecule, has been recently reported to be highly effective at detecting liver cancer. In 2010, a French researcher reported 80-90% detection rate by using \[18F\]FCH alone or in combination with \[18F\]FDG.

We will compare \[18F\]FCH and \[18F\]FDG in evaluating 150 patients over a period of two years. The results will be correlated with those of biopsies and clinical follow-up.

This study will provide valuable data on whether these imaging agents can successfully differentiate malignant liver lesions from benign ones. It will also provide information about whether these imaging agents can successfully assess whether the cancer has spread outside the liver. It will provide data that will allow physicians to determine the optimal imaging protocol to properly diagnose liver cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

18F fluorocholine 18F fluorodeoxyglucose hepatocellular carcinoma PET CT scan

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FCH PET/CT scan results

PET/CT scan results with FCH intravenous injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

18F- fluorocholine

Intervention Type DRUG

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of FCH PET scan to FDG PET scan.

FDG PET/CT scan

PET/CT scan results with FDG intravenous injection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

18F- fluorodeoxyglucose

Intervention Type DRUG

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of FCH PET scan to FDG PET scan

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

18F- fluorocholine

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of FCH PET scan to FDG PET scan.

Intervention Type DRUG

18F- fluorodeoxyglucose

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of FCH PET scan to FDG PET scan

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female, age ≥ 20 years old.
2. Patient who accepts to enter the study by signing written informed consent.
3. Patient with performance status ≤ 2 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).
4. Patient with cirrhosis or chronic liver diseases suspected to have at least 1 hepatic nodule larger than 1 cm in diameter detected by conventional image (US, CT, MRI). Patient who has not yet received any therapy relevant to the aforementioned diagnosis. Hepatic nodule is defined as any one of the following conditions: suspicious hepatocellular carcinoma, benign tumor such as hemangioma, adenoma or focal nodular hyperplasia, metastatic lesions from other primary malignancy.
5. Female patient must take reliable contraception method(s) during the participation of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient has serious allergic history or known allergy to 18F-FDG or 18F-FCH.
2. Patient has been diagnosed of multiple malignancies.
3. Female patient who is pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant during the study.
4. Patient has been participated in other investigational trials within 28 days prior to study enrollment.
5. Patient is unable to undergo PET/CT scan.
6. Subjects with active systemic infections, or medical conditions that may significantly affect action, adequate uptake and elimination of radiotracer.
7. Subject with conditions judged by the investigator as unsuitable for the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kai-Yuan Tzen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kai-Yuan Tzen, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 886-2-23123456

Email: [email protected]

Pan-Fu Kao, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 886-9-88334304

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kai-Yuan Tzen, MD

Role: primary

Pan-Fu Kao, MD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201111019MIB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id