Trial Outcomes & Findings for DAILIES TOTAL1® Lubricity Post Wear (NCT NCT02072980)
NCT ID: NCT02072980
Last Updated: 2015-05-14
Results Overview
Worn contact lenses were removed from the participant's eye. The CF was calculated and compared to the CF for unworn contact lenses. A lower CF may indicate higher contact lens lubricity. The ex-vivo lubricity was carried out on one lens (one eye) only.
COMPLETED
NA
15 participants
Day 1 (for each period), 16 hours
2015-05-14
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from 1 study center located in the US.
This reporting group includes all randomized participants (15).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
16hr/15min
Delefilcon A contact lenses worn bilaterally for 16 waking hours (1 day) in Period 1, followed by 15 minutes in Period 2. A fresh pair of lenses was dispensed for Period 2.
|
15min/16hr
Delefilcon A contact lenses worn bilaterally for 15 minutes in Period 1, follwed by 16 waking hours (1 day) in Period 2. A fresh pair of lenses was dispensed for Period 2.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1, First Wear
STARTED
|
7
|
8
|
|
Period 1, First Wear
COMPLETED
|
7
|
8
|
|
Period 1, First Wear
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 2, Second Wear
STARTED
|
7
|
8
|
|
Period 2, Second Wear
COMPLETED
|
7
|
7
|
|
Period 2, Second Wear
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
16hr/15min
Delefilcon A contact lenses worn bilaterally for 16 waking hours (1 day) in Period 1, followed by 15 minutes in Period 2. A fresh pair of lenses was dispensed for Period 2.
|
15min/16hr
Delefilcon A contact lenses worn bilaterally for 15 minutes in Period 1, follwed by 16 waking hours (1 day) in Period 2. A fresh pair of lenses was dispensed for Period 2.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 2, Second Wear
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
DAILIES TOTAL1® Lubricity Post Wear
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall
n=15 Participants
Delefilcon A contact lenses worn during Period 1 and Period 2
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.91 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (for each period), 16 hoursPopulation: This analysis population includes all participants who completed the study.
Worn contact lenses were removed from the participant's eye. The CF was calculated and compared to the CF for unworn contact lenses. A lower CF may indicate higher contact lens lubricity. The ex-vivo lubricity was carried out on one lens (one eye) only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
16 Hours
n=14 Participants
Delefilcon A contact lenses worn for 16 hours in Period 1 or 2
|
Unworn
n=14 Participants
Unworn delefilcon A contact lenses removed from the commercial packaging and soaked overnight in phosphate buffered saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average Coefficient of Friction (CF) at 16 Hours Compared to Unworn
|
0.0394 unitless
Standard Deviation 0.0015
|
0.0396 unitless
Standard Deviation 0.0027
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (for each period), 15 minutesPopulation: This analysis population includes all participants who completed the study.
Worn contact lenses were removed from the participant's eye and the CF was calculated. A lower CF may indicate higher contact lens lubricity. The ex-vivo lubricity was carried out on one lens (one eye) only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
16 Hours
n=14 Participants
Delefilcon A contact lenses worn for 16 hours in Period 1 or 2
|
Unworn
Unworn delefilcon A contact lenses removed from the commercial packaging and soaked overnight in phosphate buffered saline
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average Coefficient of Friction at 15 Minutes
|
0.0392 unitless
Standard Deviation 0.0017
|
—
|
Adverse Events
DAILIES TOTAL1
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
DAILIES TOTAL1
n=15 participants at risk
Delefilcon A contact lenses worn during Period 1 and Period 2
|
|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal infiltrates
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study (March 2014 - April 2014). This analysis population includes all participants exposed to the investigational product, based on treatment-specific exposure.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the medical device. AEs were obtained as solicited comments from the study participants and as observations by the Investigator.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular discomfort
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study (March 2014 - April 2014). This analysis population includes all participants exposed to the investigational product, based on treatment-specific exposure.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the medical device. AEs were obtained as solicited comments from the study participants and as observations by the Investigator.
|
Additional Information
Cecile Maissa, Global Brand Medical Affairs Lead - Vision Care
Alcon Research, Ltd.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place