Efficacy of Recombinant FSH/GnRH Antagonist Protocol With and Without LH Adjunct for Egg Bank Donation
NCT ID: NCT02069808
Last Updated: 2018-03-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2017-03-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Among the investigator's egg bank donors undergoing ovulation induction with recombinant FSH medication per treatment protocol outlined below, use of adjunctive LH activity medication Menopur ™ , will result in the same number of mature oocytes recovered and cryopreserved as from egg donors not treated with Menopur™.
Objectives:
Compare efficacy of recombinant FSH (Follistim ™) with and without adjunct LH activity medication Menopur ™ for our volunteer egg bank donors.
Efficacy defined as:
1. #Days of ovarian stimulation to GnRH agonist trigger.
2. Peak serum estradiol level on day of GnRH agonist trigger.
3. Number of follicles \>15 mm average diameter on day of GnRH agonist trigger.
4. Number of mature oocytes recovered and cryopreserved.
Study type: Randomized prospective clinical trial.
Patient selection: Voluntary egg donors who have satisfied all screening criteria for FDA and the Michigan Egg Bank: Age range 18-to 39 years. BMI 18 to 25. Resting antral follicle count of 16 or greater. Cycle day 3 FSH \<10 mIU/ml. AMH \>2.0 ng/ml.
Study design:
Two groups- Group A- Recombinant FSH Follistim only; Group B- Recombinant FSH Follistim and adjunct Menopur. Both groups will use GnRH agonist trigger 36 hours prior to egg retrieval.
Random number generator with patients assigned basd on odd or even numbers.
Number of subjects: 25 in each group. Total of 50 subjects. This takes into account possible cycle cancellation for poor ovarian response or patient elective withdrawal to result in at least 20 subjects in each group completing the study.
Primary measure of outcome: number of mature oocytes recovered and cryopreserved.
Secondary measures of outcome:
1. #Days of ovarian stimulation to GnRH agonist trigger.
2. Peak serum estradiol level on day of GnRH agonist trigger.
3. Number of follicles \>15 mm average diameter on day of GnRH agonist trigger.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MENOPUR in Gonadotrophin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist Cycles With Single Embryo Transfer
NCT00884221
MENOPUR® Versus FOLLISTIM®
NCT00802360
MENOPUR® in a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist Cycle With Single-Blastocyst Transfer in a High Responder Subject Population
NCT02554279
Androgenic Profile Following Controlled Ovarian Stimulation
NCT02992808
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) With Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Versus Antagonist
NCT01888744
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigator's Center has been studying human oocyte cryopreservation by vitrification since July 1, 2008 (Western Institutional Board Review -WIRB Pro. Nr: 20081080, WIRB Study Nr.: 1100421). The first phase of the investigator's study was to assess efficacy of oocyte cryopreservation among voluntary egg donors with end points for outcomes including rates of oocyte thaw survival, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth and infant health. The rationale for starting with egg donors was that they represent a population of women most likely to have optimal egg quality and a short turnaround time from vitrification to thaw, IVF and embryo transfer into an appropriate egg recipient patient. If the investigator could establish good outcomes when egg quality is optimal, then there would be good hope to provide reliable egg cryopreservation technology to women in need of fertility preservation when facing treatment of cancer; other illnesses for which treatments harm their eggs; women choosing personal egg banking and for women who wish to avoid excess embryo creation on moral or religious grounds.
The investigator's study observations were that outcomes with use of previously cryopreserved donor eggs was equivalent to fresh donor eggs: 90% of mature oocytes survived the thaw, 76% of thawed oocytes fertilized normally with ICSI, 98% of recipient women had a day 5 embryo transfer with one or two embryos transferred, implantation rate of 42%, 60% or recipient women achieved clinical pregnancy, 58% live birth rate and no birth defects have been observed in over 40 babies delivered through this technology at our Center.
In the beginning of 2012, we opened up the second phase of the investigator's study to include women in need of fertility preservation for the indications mentioned above. No outcomes are yet known due to the expected time deferment from oocyte cryopreservation to use. The favorable outcomes from donor egg bank IVF led to the investigator's establishing the Michigan Egg Bank. On October 22, 2012, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine announced a new practice guideline that oocyte cryopreservation technology should be considered mainstream medical therapy and no long be considered experimental medical care. The investigator's closed the WIRB study November, 26, 2012.
Rationale:
Ovarian stimulation for egg donation should be provided offering the safest and simplest process for our egg donors. Avoiding complications of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome while assuring recruitment and harvest of good quality oocytes is a main goal in caring for the investigator's volunteer egg donors. Use of FSH medications with GnRH antagonist and GnRH agonist trigger is the protocol of choice for all of the investigator's egg donors. The investigator's egg donors have experienced no complications and rapid recovery. GnRH antagonists have been shown to suppress endogenous ovarian androgen synthesis. In using GnRH antagonist, adjunctive LH or low dose hCG combined with FSH medication has been a mainstream assumption to assure sufficient endogenous ovarian testosterone is present as a substrate for estrogen synthesis and normal folliculogenesis.
In an effort to improve patient compliance by simplifying the use of medications for the investigator's egg donors, the investigator wishes to examine the efficacy of recombinant FSH without additional separate medication of adjunct LH activity in the form Menopur ™.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group B: Follistim and Menopur
Group B: N=25 subjects
1. Cycle day 2 start Follistim 200 U/day up to 11 days duration.
2. Cycle day 2 start Menopur (menotropins) 75 U/day up to 11 days duration.
3. Add GnRH antagonist Ganirelix 250 µg/day starting 5 days before GnRH agonist trigger.
4. GnRH agonist Leuprolide Acetate (Lupron) 1 mg subcutaneous injection 36 hours prior to egg collection.
5. Transvaginal ultrasound guided needle aspiration of oocytes 36 hours after Lupron trigger.
Follistim
Follicle stimulating hormone promotes recruitment of follicles for ovulation.
Ganirelix
GnRH antagonist preventing a problematic risk of premature LH surge during ovulation induction therapy.
Menotropins
Combination of follicle stimulating hormone and Luteinizing hormone activity promotes recruitment of follicles for ovulation. Absence or presence of this medication is the difference being tested between the two arms of the study.
Leuprolide
Promotes endogenous LH surge signaling oocyte maturation followed by ovulation. This controls timing for oocyte collection.
Transvaginal ultrasound guided needle aspiration of oocytes
Group A: Follistim only
Group A: N=25 subjects
1. Cycle day 2 start Follistim 250 U/day up to 11 days duration.
2. Add GnRH antagonist Ganirelix 250 µg/day starting 5 days before GnRH agonist trigger.
3. GnRH agonist Leuprolide Acetate (Lupron) 1 mg subcutaneous injection 36 hours prior to egg collection.
4. Transvaginal ultrasound guided needle aspiration of oocytes 36 hours after Lupron trigger.
Follistim
Follicle stimulating hormone promotes recruitment of follicles for ovulation.
Ganirelix
GnRH antagonist preventing a problematic risk of premature LH surge during ovulation induction therapy.
Leuprolide
Promotes endogenous LH surge signaling oocyte maturation followed by ovulation. This controls timing for oocyte collection.
Transvaginal ultrasound guided needle aspiration of oocytes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Follistim
Follicle stimulating hormone promotes recruitment of follicles for ovulation.
Ganirelix
GnRH antagonist preventing a problematic risk of premature LH surge during ovulation induction therapy.
Menotropins
Combination of follicle stimulating hormone and Luteinizing hormone activity promotes recruitment of follicles for ovulation. Absence or presence of this medication is the difference being tested between the two arms of the study.
Leuprolide
Promotes endogenous LH surge signaling oocyte maturation followed by ovulation. This controls timing for oocyte collection.
Transvaginal ultrasound guided needle aspiration of oocytes
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
28 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Michigan Reproductive Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael S. Mersol-Barg, MD
Principle Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael S Mersol-Barg, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Michigan Reproductive Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Michigan Reproductive Medicine
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MRM2014-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.