Shared Decision Making in Parents of Children With Head Trauma: Head CT Choice

NCT ID: NCT02063087

Last Updated: 2019-05-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

971 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will test the impact of a decision aid, Head CT Choice, to determine if its use improves parents' knowledge and engagement in decision making and safely decreases healthcare utilization in children presenting to the emergency department with blunt head trauma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators' long term goal is to promote evidence-based, patient-centered evaluation in the acute setting, to more closely tailor testing to disease risk. The investigators will compare the use of risk stratification tools with usual clinical approaches to treatment selection or administration through the following aim:

Test if the decision aid, Head CT Choice, improves validated patient-centered outcome measures and safely decreases healthcare utilization. The investigators will randomize at the clinician level. Through the use of the intervention, Head CT Choice, the investigators aim to significantly increase parents' knowledge, engagement, and satisfaction, decrease the rate of head CT use, and decrease 7-day total healthcare utilization, with no significant increase in adverse events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Head Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Decision Aid

Head CT Decision Aid

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Head CT Decision Aid

Intervention Type OTHER

The decision aid, Head CT Choice, educates parents regarding how the clinician determined the severity of their child's head trauma, their child's quantitative risk for a clinically-important TBI, the pros and cons of cranial CT compared to active observation, and what signs and symptoms parents should watch for in the next 24 hours that should prompt a return visit to the ED.

Usual Care

Clinicians and patients do not have access to the Head CT Decision Aid

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Head CT Decision Aid

The decision aid, Head CT Choice, educates parents regarding how the clinician determined the severity of their child's head trauma, their child's quantitative risk for a clinically-important TBI, the pros and cons of cranial CT compared to active observation, and what signs and symptoms parents should watch for in the next 24 hours that should prompt a return visit to the ED.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Parents and their child, seeking care for a child who:

1. Is \< 18 years of age;
2. Had blunt trauma above the eyebrows (not isolated to face or eyes);
3. Is positive for at least 1 of the PECARN clinical prediction rule predictors described below:

PECARN Predictors for children \< 2 years of age:

Severe mechanism (PECARN definition)\* Loss of consciousness \> 5 seconds Acting abnormally per parent Initial ED GCS \< 15 by attending (or CT decision-maker) Other signs of altered mental status (PECARN definition) Presence of occipital, temporal or parietal scalp hematoma Palpable skull fracture or unclear if skull fracture

PECARN predictors for children 2-18 years of age:

Severe mechanism (PECARN definition)\* Any loss of consciousness Any vomiting since the injury Severe headache in ED Initial ED GCS \< 15 by attending (or CT decision-maker) Other signs of altered mental status (PECARN definition)\*\* Any sign of basilar skull fracture Clinicians include attending physicians and fellows or midlevel providers caring for children with head trauma

Exclusion Criteria

Parents of children with:

1. GCS scores \< 15
2. Evidence of penetrating trauma, signs of basilar skull fracture, or depressed skull fracture on physical examination
3. Brain tumors
4. Ventricular shunts
5. Bleeding disorder
6. Pre-existing neurological disorders complicating assessment
7. Neuroimaging at an outside hospital before transfer
8. Signs of altered mental status (agitation, somnolence, repetitive questioning, or slow response to verbal communication)
9. Syncope or seizure disorder preceded (led to) head trauma or seizure post head trauma
10. Known to be pregnant
11. Communication barriers such as visual or hearing impairment that may preclude use of the decision aid.
12. Strong suspicion of abuse for this head injury
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Davis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Flying Buttress Associates

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nationwide Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Boston Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

M. Fernanda Bellolio

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

M.Fernanda Bellolio, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Boston Children's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospitals and Clinics of MN, Minneapolis

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospitals and Clincis of MN, St Paul ED

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, Hoyle JD Jr, Atabaki SM, Holubkov R, Nadel FM, Monroe D, Stanley RM, Borgialli DA, Badawy MK, Schunk JE, Quayle KS, Mahajan P, Lichenstein R, Lillis KA, Tunik MG, Jacobs ES, Callahan JM, Gorelick MH, Glass TF, Lee LK, Bachman MC, Cooper A, Powell EC, Gerardi MJ, Melville KA, Muizelaar JP, Wisner DH, Zuspan SJ, Dean JM, Wootton-Gorges SL; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1160-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61558-0. Epub 2009 Sep 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19758692 (View on PubMed)

Hess EP, Homme JL, Kharbanda AB, Tzimenatos L, Louie JP, Cohen DM, Nigrovic LE, Westphal JJ, Shah ND, Inselman J, Ferrara MJ, Herrin J, Montori VM, Kuppermann N. Effect of the Head Computed Tomography Choice Decision Aid in Parents of Children With Minor Head Trauma: A Cluster Randomized Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182430. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2430.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30646167 (View on PubMed)

Hess EP, Wyatt KD, Kharbanda AB, Louie JP, Dayan PS, Tzimenatos L, Wootton-Gorges SL, Homme JL, Pencille R N L, LeBlanc A, Westphal JJ, Shepel K, Shah ND, Branda M, Herrin J, Montori VM, Kuppermann N. Effectiveness of the head CT choice decision aid in parents of children with minor head trauma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials. 2014 Jun 25;15:253. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-253.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24965659 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FP00071515

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

13-004659

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IVF in Pediatric Concussion
NCT02214316 TERMINATED PHASE1/PHASE2
Ketamine in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT06062628 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1