European Dyspnoea Survey in the EMergency Departments

NCT ID: NCT02060799

Last Updated: 2014-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

2156 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Braunwald defines dyspnoea as an abnormally uncomfortable awareness of breathing. Breathing discomfort, and its varying degrees of severity, is the one of the most disturbing symptoms patients can experience; and it is one of the main complaints in the patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). Dyspnea has a variety of underlying etiologies, like cardiac, pulmonary or metabolic etiologies or a combination of them, since several diseases can cause dyspnea like for instance heart failure (HF), asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Acute heart failure syndrome (AHFS) is collectively defined as a gradual or rapid change in heart failure (HF) signs and symptoms resulting in a need for urgent therapy. Heart failure (HF) is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. The prevalence of symptomatic HF is estimated to range from 0.4 to 2.0% in general European population. The incidence increases rapidly with age, and in Europe. Characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes of HF patients admitted to hospital have been adequately described, in Europe and in the United States. The Euro Heart Failure Survey (EHFS) I with 11 327 patients described the demographics of acutely hospitalized HF patients. The ADHERE registry has data on over 100 000 hospitalizations for AHF from the USA. In-hospital mortality was 4 and 7%, in ADHERE and EHFS I, respectively.

This same sensation of breathlessness is what also drives patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to the ED. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation accounts for approximately 1.5 million ED visits in the United States per year. It is the third most common cause of hospitalization, with an estimated 726 000 hospitalizations in 2000 in the USA. Previous studies have demonstrated important differences between guideline recommendations and actual management of COPD exacerbation, either in the ED or during hospitalization.

The diagnosis in front of a dyspneic patient in the ED remains a challenge, because of a low sensitivity of the clinical signs associated with the aging of the population and the variety of underlying diseases. Little is known about the Epidemiology of dyspneic patients in the ED at the European level. Diagnosis, prevalence and treatment of the patients may vary among European countries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

MAIN OBJECTIVES

* Epidemiologic description of patients presenting to the ED with shortness of breath as main complaint.
* Description of current management in the ED of patients presenting to the ED with shortness of breath as main complaint.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

* Sub analysis of ED discharged patients versus admitted patients for characteristics, comparison to recommended care and re-ED visit.
* Determine clinical and/or biological criteria to distinguish between:

* Patients who are treated as outpatients and admitted patients.
* Patients hospitalized in ward and patients admitted to intensive care units (CCU and ICU)
* Prognostic prediction, using clinical and biochemical data
* To determine if ED patients treated for acute heart failure differ from those admitted to hospital.
* Comparison of European data characteristics, investigation, treatment and outcome to similar data in other part of the world.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dyspnea Emergencies

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Dyspnea Emergency Service, Hospital prognosis Fatal Outcome Epidemiology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department with Dyspnea as main complaint
* 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

* No acceptance to participate from the patient
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hopital Lariboisière

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Said LARIBI, MD, PhD.

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Said LARIBI, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lariboisière Hospital, EuSEM

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Country: Belgium

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Country: Finland

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Country: France

Paris, , France

Site Status

Country: Germany

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Country: Italy

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Country: Netherlands

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Country: Romania

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Country: Spain

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Country: Turkey

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Country: United Kingdom

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Finland France Germany Italy Netherlands Romania Spain Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HLariboisiere

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id