Pretreatment MRI Predicting Outcome After Radio-frequency Ablation of HCC

NCT ID: NCT02051283

Last Updated: 2014-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

HCC is classified as keratin (K) 19 positive or K19 negative. K19 is a biliary/hepatic progenitor cell (HPC) marker only expressed in a subset of HCC with poor prognosis and high risk of early recurrence after treatment; particularly in radio-frequency ablation (RFA). These patients consequently show worse survival compared to patients with K19 negative HCC.

A recent publication has shown the value of pretreatment biopsy with K19 staining and suggests that the role of routine biopsies in potentially curable HCC should be reconsidered.

However, currently, pretreatment biopsies are rarely performed in the diagnosis of HCC due to the excellent performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection, diagnosis and staging of cirrhotic livers.

Previous publications have indicated imaging patterns that may be associated with worse prognostic tumoral parameters.

If MRI determined imaging parameters could indeed provide a surrogate marker for presence of K19 and/or microvascular invasion as potential important prognostic factors in RFA of HCC, these imaging parameters may thus hold prognostic information towards RFA treatment and possibly predict treatment outcome. .

The purpose of the retrospective study is thus to evaluate MRI determined imaging parameters at pretreatment MRI for their predictive value towards outcome (disease free survival) of radio-frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

If successful, pretreatment MRI parameters may be used for selecting patient with high risk of unfavorable outcome after RFA and select the patients for more aggressive treatment such as surgical resection or upfront transplantation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recent pathological, immunohistochemical and molecular profiling have progressively revealed the complex classification of primary liver cancers and have resulted in a subclassification roughly separating mucinous cholangiocarcinomas from mixed tumors from "pure" hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

In addition, HCC is classified as keratin (K) 19 positive or K19 negative. K19 is a biliary/hepatic progenitor cell (HPC) marker only expressed in a subset of HCC with poor prognosis and high risk of early recurrence after treatment; particularly in radio-frequency ablation (RFA). These patients consequently show worse survival compared to patients with K19 negative HCC.

A recent publication has shown the value of pretreatment biopsy with K19 staining and suggests that the role of routine biopsies in potentially curable HCC should be reconsidered.

However, currently, pretreatment biopsies are rarely performed in the diagnosis of HCC due to the excellent performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection, diagnosis and staging of cirrhotic livers. This progression of MRI is based on technical refining of three-phase contrast-enhanced imaging, development of the cellular marker sequence diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and hepatospecific biliary contrast-agents. While pretreatment biopsies would have incremental value in treatment planning, its routine application in daily clinical practice is faced with multiple problems. First, K19 evaluation at histopathology can - in most cases - only reliably be performed on whole resection specimens and is more difficult on biopsies. Second, routine biopsies would lead to a dramatic increase in workload for radiologists and pathologists influencing daily practice and organization. Also, lesions are not always readily detectable at ultrasound and possibly not eligible for percutaneous biopsy requiring laparoscopy guided biopsy under anesthesia. Third, the risk of tract seeding remains controversial but has not been completely excluded.

Previous publications have indicated imaging patterns that may be associated with worse prognostic tumoral parameters. The corona sign seen at CT during arterial portography and hepatic arteriography (invasive imaging only performed in Japan) is associated with the presence of microvascular invasion. However, this sign has not yet been described at MRI. Also MRI derived parameters may predict the presence of HCC expressing progenitor cell markers, including K19. If MRI determined imaging parameters could indeed provide a surrogate marker for presence of K19 and/or microvascular invasion as potential important prognostic factors in RFA of HCC, these imaging parameters may thus hold prognostic information towards RFA treatment and possibly predict treatment outcome. The hypothesis is that lesions showing features correlating to K19 positivity such as persistent (rim) enhancement and rim like intensity at DWI may correlate to worse prognosis than HCC that don't express these imaging features.

If confirmed, MRI may be the first line modality adapting the patients management; either by selecting patients who actually would benefit from biopsy or identifying patients in who more invasive treatment is necessary (for instance: surgical resection instead of RFA in child A patients; ablation with wider margins in patients not eligible for surgery).

However, before performing a prospective or interventional study, experience needs to be gained with the various possible imaging patterns, aiming to find significant correlations between imaging parameters and adverse prognosis.

The purpose of the retrospective study is thus to evaluate MRI determined imaging parameters at pretreatment MRI for their predictive value towards outcome (disease free survival) of radio-frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

If successful, pretreatment MRI parameters may be used for selecting patient with high risk of unfavorable outcome after RFA and select the patients for more aggressive treatment such as surgical resection or upfront transplantation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Hepatocellular carcinoma RFA MRI

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

patients with HCC eligible for RFA

patients with HCC eligible for RFA

RFA

Intervention Type OTHER

RFA

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RFA

RFA

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Documented and diagnosed liver confined hepatocellular carcinoma by existing imaging criteria according to currently accepted international guidelines (\< 4cm).
* Treatment radio-frequency ablation - (percutaneous, laparascopy, laparatomy)
* Availability of pretreatment MRI with three phase contrast enhanced images and diffusion-weighted sequence prior to treatment.
* Follow-up of at least 2 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* Non availability of pathologic confirmation or biopsy during radio-frequency ablation.
* Post-treatment follow-up \< 2 years.
* Treatment other than RFA
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Gasthuisberg

Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Vandecaveye

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Sbis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id