To Compare the Efficacy and Safety of LAYLA in Osteoarthritis Patients of the Knee

NCT ID: NCT02049606

Last Updated: 2017-09-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

134 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-24

Study Completion Date

2016-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of LAYLA tablet and CENATONE tablet in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LAYLA

Drug : LAYLA tablet/bid

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LAYLA tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

1 Tablet twice a day

CENATONE

Drug : CENATONE tablet/qd

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CENATONE tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

2 Tablets once a day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LAYLA tablet

1 Tablet twice a day

Intervention Type DRUG

CENATONE tablet

2 Tablets once a day

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LAYLA 405.4mg Nabumetone 500mg

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients ≥40 and ≤80 years of age
* Radiographic evidence of grade 1,2 or 3 osteoarthritis based on the Kellgren \& Lawrence radiographic entry criteria
* Stable osteoarthritis during 3 months
* Score of 100mm Pain VAS ≤ 80mm at screening
* Score of 100mm Pain VAS ≥ 40mm at baseline
* Written consent form voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria

* Disease of spine or other Lower limb joints that could affect fo evaluate the efficacy
* History of surgery or arthroscopy of the study joint within 6 months
* Trauma of study joint within 12 months
* Medication of constantly(more than 1 week) corticosteroid by oral within 3 months
* Diagnosed with psychical disorder, and taking medication
* Medication of intra-articular injection within 3 months
* Uncontrollable Hypertension patients at screening test
* History of upper gastrointestinal ulceration within 6 months, History of upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 12 months
* History of lower gastrointestinal bleeding within 12 months
* History of coronary artery bypass, systemic lupus erythematosus or mixed connective tissue disease
* Serum creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin over ULN X 2.0 at screening test
* History of hypersensitivity of LAYLA, CENATONE or NSAIDs
* Participation in another clinical trials within 4 weeks
* Medication of constantly (more than 1 week) narcotic analgesics within 3 months
* Not consent about using effectual contraception method during trial
* Pregnant or lactating woman
* History of malignant tumor within 5 years
* Investigator's judgment
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

PMG Pharm Co., Ltd

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Seung Baik Kang, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

Jeong Ku Ha, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Inje University

Han Jun Lee, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine

Yong In, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Catholic University of Korea

Jong Min Kim, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Asan Medical Center

Sahng Hoon Lee, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Asan Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Chung-Ang University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul ST. Mary's Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LAYLA_P4_NB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id