Leader Partner Interactions

NCT ID: NCT02048774

Last Updated: 2016-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

58 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Obesity is often cited as being inversely related with socioeconomic status (SES), although the mechanisms linking social status with obesity are not well understood. Dietary restraint, physical activity, and social mobility have been proposed as possible mechanisms. Although there is some evidence of SES variation in the proposed mechanisms, evidence is mixed and mostly observational. The purpose of this research is to determine if one's social position influences eating behaviors. This study will attempt to determine this using a randomized, 2 parallel arm trial to determine the effects that social hierarchy positioning has on energy intake. To prevent compromise in the integrity of data, the investigators will detail the exact treatment condition (i.e., social positioning) after the data collection period.

Based on findings from previous animal and large clinical observational studies, there are two complementary hypotheses tested in this study. First, it is hypothesized that being in a lower social position affects one's perception of food availability by making the future availability of food seem less certain. This uncertainty will lead to increased food consumption. Second, it is hypothesized that being in a position of power will lower one's food consumption, as previous research has found that individuals in power tend to east less in groups. Understanding how social position influences food intake could help improve weight loss/maintenance interventions by identifying unexpected factors that could limit the intervention's effectiveness.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Socioeconomic Status Food Intake

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High Social Position

The investigators will randomly assign a participant to a higher social position.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Designation of Social Positioning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Low Social Position

The investigators will randomly assign a participant to a lower social position.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Designation of Social Positioning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Designation of Social Positioning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female college student between the ages of 19 and 25

Exclusion Criteria

* Those with food allergies
* Pregnant individuals
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gregory pavela

Postdoctoral Trainee

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gregory Pavela, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Postdoctoral Trainee, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Dwight Lewis, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Postdoctoral Trainee, University of Alabama at Birmingham

David B Allison, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Associate Dean for Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Brian Wansink, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor, Cornell University

Emily J Dhurandhar, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistant Professor, University of Alabama at Birmingham

John Dawson, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Postdoctoral Trainee, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Madeline Jeansonne, MA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Program Coordinator 1, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UAB School of Health Professions; Webb Building Rooms 503 and 504

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

X131210007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.