Trial Outcomes & Findings for Developing and Testing a Personalized Evidence-based Shared Decision-making Tool for Stent Selection (NCT NCT02046902)

NCT ID: NCT02046902

Last Updated: 2019-08-06

Results Overview

The primary outcome was whether or not patients participated in SDM regarding stent choice. Patients were categorized as having participated in SDM if they answered anything other than "doctor alone" in response to the question "Who chose the type of stent?"

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

586 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

30 months

Results posted on

2019-08-06

Participant Flow

Between May 2014 and December 2016, patients were recruited from 2 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute (MAHI) and Truman Medical Center (TMC), following institutional review board (IRB) approval at each site.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Pre-Implementation
Patients who undergo coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) received an Patient Risk Information Systems Manager (ePRISM) consent form with personalized risk estimates for mortality, bleeding, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) with bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES), but neither the shared decision-making (SDM) tool nor decision coaching.
Post-implementation With Decision Coaching
Patients received the consent form, the SDM tool for stent selection, and decision coaching
Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching
Patients received the consent form and the SDM tool, but no decision coaching
Overall Study
STARTED
336
113
137
Overall Study
COMPLETED
336
113
137
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Pre-Implementation
n=336 Participants
Patients who undergo coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) received an Patient Risk Information Systems Manager (ePRISM) consent form with personalized risk estimates for mortality, bleeding, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) with bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES), but neither the shared decision-making (SDM) tool nor decision coaching.
Post-implementation With Decision Coaching
n=113 Participants
Patients received the consent form, the SDM tool for stent selection, and decision coaching
Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching
n=137 Participants
patients received the consent form and the SDM tool, but no decision coaching
Total
n=586 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=333 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
67.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=113 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
68.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=137 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
67.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=583 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Sex: Female, Male
Female
93 Participants
n=259 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
39 Participants
n=110 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
49 Participants
n=137 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
181 Participants
n=506 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Sex: Female, Male
Male
166 Participants
n=259 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
71 Participants
n=110 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
88 Participants
n=137 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
325 Participants
n=506 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=327 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=112 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=135 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=574 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=327 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=112 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
1 Participants
n=135 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
1 Participants
n=574 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=327 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=112 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=135 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=574 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
77 Participants
n=327 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
21 Participants
n=112 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
18 Participants
n=135 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
116 Participants
n=574 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
250 Participants
n=327 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
91 Participants
n=112 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
116 Participants
n=135 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
457 Participants
n=574 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=327 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=112 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=135 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=574 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=327 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=112 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=135 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=574 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic Ethnicity
5 Participants
n=291 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
2 Participants
n=112 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
3 Participants
n=132 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
10 Participants
n=535 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Site
Mid America Heart Insitute
191 Participants
n=336 Participants
86 Participants
n=113 Participants
132 Participants
n=137 Participants
409 Participants
n=586 Participants
Site
Truman Medical Center/Univ. of Missouri KC
145 Participants
n=336 Participants
27 Participants
n=113 Participants
5 Participants
n=137 Participants
177 Participants
n=586 Participants
Diabetes
152 Participants
n=335 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
49 Participants
n=113 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
69 Participants
n=131 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
270 Participants
n=579 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Hypertension
266 Participants
n=336 Participants
92 Participants
n=113 Participants
106 Participants
n=137 Participants
464 Participants
n=586 Participants
Peripheral arterial disease
29 Participants
n=331 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
22 Participants
n=113 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
20 Participants
n=121 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
71 Participants
n=565 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
53 Participants
n=334 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
20 Participants
n=113 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
28 Participants
n=127 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
101 Participants
n=574 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
137 Participants
n=333 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
50 Participants
n=113 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
66 Participants
n=133 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
253 Participants
n=579 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Admission Status
Inpatient
116 Participants
n=326 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
44 Participants
n=111 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
57 Participants
n=129 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
217 Participants
n=566 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Admission Status
Outpatient
189 Participants
n=326 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
67 Participants
n=111 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
71 Participants
n=129 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
327 Participants
n=566 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
Admission Status
Emergent
21 Participants
n=326 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
0 Participants
n=111 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
1 Participants
n=129 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.
22 Participants
n=566 Participants • Number analyzed for this baseline measure reflects data captured and does account for missing or unknown data.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

The primary outcome was whether or not patients participated in SDM regarding stent choice. Patients were categorized as having participated in SDM if they answered anything other than "doctor alone" in response to the question "Who chose the type of stent?"

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pre-Implementation
n=336 Participants
Patients who undergo coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) received an Patient Risk Information Systems Manager (ePRISM) consent form with personalized risk estimates for mortality, bleeding, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) with bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES), but neither the shared decision-making (SDM) tool nor decision coaching.
Post-implementation With Decision Coaching
n=113 Participants
Patients received the consent form, the SDM tool for stent selection, and decision coaching
Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching
n=137 Participants
Patients received the consent form and the SDM tool, but no decision coaching
Assessment of Pre-implementation, Post-implementation With Decision Coaching, and Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching
You alone
8 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
Assessment of Pre-implementation, Post-implementation With Decision Coaching, and Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching
Doctor Alone
235 Participants
45 Participants
106 Participants
Assessment of Pre-implementation, Post-implementation With Decision Coaching, and Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching
Mostly Doctor
51 Participants
19 Participants
20 Participants
Assessment of Pre-implementation, Post-implementation With Decision Coaching, and Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching
Mostly you
2 Participants
11 Participants
6 Participants
Assessment of Pre-implementation, Post-implementation With Decision Coaching, and Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching
Doctor and you equally
40 Participants
32 Participants
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 months

Secondary outcomes included patients' recall of individual aspects of the stent discussion, stent knowledge score, patient preference for stent type, perceived autonomy support from their providers ,and concordance of patient stent preference and type of stent received. Patients were categorized as having voiced a stent preference if they answered anything other than "I don't care" or "I don't know" in response to the question "After reviewing the risks and benefits of both types of stents, which type of stent did you want?"

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pre-Implementation
n=336 Participants
Patients who undergo coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) received an Patient Risk Information Systems Manager (ePRISM) consent form with personalized risk estimates for mortality, bleeding, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) with bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES), but neither the shared decision-making (SDM) tool nor decision coaching.
Post-implementation With Decision Coaching
n=113 Participants
Patients received the consent form, the SDM tool for stent selection, and decision coaching
Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching
n=137 Participants
Patients received the consent form and the SDM tool, but no decision coaching
Concordance Between Stent Preference and Stent Received Was a Secondary Outcome.
Drug eluting stent
83 Participants
49 Participants
23 Participants
Concordance Between Stent Preference and Stent Received Was a Secondary Outcome.
Bare metal stent
36 Participants
29 Participants
2 Participants
Concordance Between Stent Preference and Stent Received Was a Secondary Outcome.
I don't care
119 Participants
29 Participants
69 Participants
Concordance Between Stent Preference and Stent Received Was a Secondary Outcome.
I don't know
98 Participants
6 Participants
43 Participants

Adverse Events

Pre-Implementation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Post-implementation With Decision Coaching

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Post-implementation Without Decision Coaching

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Carole Decker

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute

Phone: (816) 932-5440

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place