Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) in Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate or Other Non-Biologic DMARDs in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Current Non-Biologic DMARD Therapy or the First Anti-TNF Biologic Agent (NCT NCT02046603)
NCT ID: NCT02046603
Last Updated: 2018-12-07
Results Overview
DAS28 was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\] where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR greater than or equal to (≥) 2.6 to less than or equal to (≤) 3.2 implied low disease activity, greater than (\>) 3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and less than (\<) 2.6 implied clinical remission.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
162 participants
Baseline, Week 2
2018-12-07
Participant Flow
A total of 162 participants were enrolled. One participant who did not receive a dose of tocilizumab was excluded from the full analysis set (FAS) and the results are reported for 161 participants.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
Participants received a weekly subcutaneous (SC) injection of tocilizumab 162 milligrams (mg) as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
22
|
140
|
|
Overall Study
Received at Least 1 Dose of Tocilizumab
|
21
|
140
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
7
|
65
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
15
|
75
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
Participants received a weekly subcutaneous (SC) injection of tocilizumab 162 milligrams (mg) as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
11
|
66
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Participant/legal guardian decision
|
1
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) in Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate or Other Non-Biologic DMARDs in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Current Non-Biologic DMARD Therapy or the First Anti-TNF Biologic Agent
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
Total
n=161 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.63 • n=5 Participants
|
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.76 • n=7 Participants
|
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.14 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\] where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR greater than or equal to (≥) 2.6 to less than or equal to (≤) 3.2 implied low disease activity, greater than (\>) 3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and less than (\<) 2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=139 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Week 2
Baseline
|
5.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.014
|
5.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.257
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Week 2
Change at Week 2
|
-1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.994
|
-1.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.131
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=137 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 4
|
-1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.016
|
-2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.215
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=18 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=131 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 8
|
-2.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.352
|
-2.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.482
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=19 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=128 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 12
|
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.522
|
-2.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.510
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=18 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=125 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 16
|
-2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.218
|
-3.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.532
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 20Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=19 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=121 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 20
|
-3.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.346
|
-3.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.525
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=19 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=117 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 24
|
-3.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.379
|
-3.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.470
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=19 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=115 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 28
|
-3.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.260
|
-3.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.552
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 32Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=19 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=115 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 32
|
-3.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.418
|
-3.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.448
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 36Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=18 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=114 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 36
|
-3.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.358
|
-3.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.589
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 40Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=17 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=111 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 40
|
-3.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.143
|
-3.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.524
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 44Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=17 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=107 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 44
|
-3.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.325
|
-3.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.574
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=16 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=107 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 48
|
-3.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.146
|
-3.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.552
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=15 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=107 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 52
|
-3.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.361
|
-3.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.592
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to ≤5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high/severe disease, and \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=5 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=28 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Early Withdrawal
|
-2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.236
|
-1.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.480
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population.
A participant had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20 percent (%) improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC (68 joints) and SJC (66 joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, averaged to 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either C-reactive protein \[CRP\] or ESR).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 2
|
6 participants
|
23 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 4
|
6 participants
|
68 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 8
|
11 participants
|
69 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 12
|
10 participants
|
83 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 16
|
13 participants
|
83 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 20
|
15 participants
|
86 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 24
|
15 participants
|
90 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 28
|
14 participants
|
87 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 32
|
13 participants
|
89 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 36
|
12 participants
|
92 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 40
|
13 participants
|
91 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 44
|
12 participants
|
88 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 48
|
12 participants
|
87 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Week 52
|
12 participants
|
88 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology Criteria 20 (ACR20) Response
Early withdrawal
|
3 participants
|
10 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population.
A participant had an ACR50 response if there was at least a 50% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC (68 joints) and SJC (66 joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, averaged to 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either CRP or ESR).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 2
|
0 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 4
|
3 participants
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 8
|
6 participants
|
43 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 12
|
8 participants
|
54 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 16
|
7 participants
|
62 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 20
|
9 participants
|
61 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 24
|
9 participants
|
64 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 28
|
13 participants
|
68 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 32
|
8 participants
|
69 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 36
|
9 participants
|
74 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 40
|
9 participants
|
71 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 44
|
10 participants
|
72 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 48
|
11 participants
|
73 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Week 52
|
8 participants
|
73 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response
Early withdrawal
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population.
A participant had an ACR70 response if there was at least a 70% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC (68 joints) and SJC (66 joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, averaged to 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either CRP or ESR).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 48
|
8 participants
|
56 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 2
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 4
|
1 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 8
|
4 participants
|
19 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 12
|
3 participants
|
30 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 16
|
3 participants
|
32 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 20
|
7 participants
|
37 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 24
|
5 participants
|
38 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 28
|
6 participants
|
44 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 32
|
6 participants
|
47 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 36
|
7 participants
|
48 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 40
|
8 participants
|
49 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 44
|
6 participants
|
53 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Week 52
|
7 participants
|
54 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response
Early withdrawal
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population.
DAS28-ESR was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS: 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity). DAS28-ESR scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. The DAS28-ESR based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders had a change from baseline \>1.2 with a DAS28 score ≤3.2; moderate responders had a change from baseline \>1.2 with a DAS28 score \>3.2 or a change from baseline \>0.6 to ≤1.2 with a DAS28 score ≤5.1. Participants with change from baseline \>0.6 to ≤1.2 with a DAS28 score \>5.1, or any score with change from baseline ≤0.6, were assessed as non-responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 2: No response
|
4 participants
|
56 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 2: Moderate response
|
10 participants
|
56 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 2: Good response
|
7 participants
|
25 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 4: No response
|
3 participants
|
22 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 4: Moderate response
|
7 participants
|
58 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 4: Good response
|
11 participants
|
57 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 8: No response
|
1 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 8: Moderate response
|
9 participants
|
48 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 8: Good response
|
8 participants
|
72 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 12: No response
|
4 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 12: Moderate response
|
3 participants
|
34 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 12: Good response
|
12 participants
|
83 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 16: No response
|
1 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 16: Moderate response
|
4 participants
|
30 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 16: Good response
|
13 participants
|
86 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 20: No response
|
0 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 20: Moderate response
|
5 participants
|
27 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 20: Good response
|
14 participants
|
85 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 24: No response
|
1 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 24: Moderate response
|
2 participants
|
21 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 24: Good response
|
16 participants
|
89 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 28: No response
|
1 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 28: Moderate response
|
0 participants
|
24 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 28: Good response
|
18 participants
|
86 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 32: No response
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 32: Moderate response
|
2 participants
|
21 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 32: Good response
|
16 participants
|
91 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 36: No response
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 36: Moderate response
|
3 participants
|
19 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 36: Good response
|
15 participants
|
91 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 40: No response
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 40: Moderate response
|
1 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 40: Good response
|
16 participants
|
94 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 44: No response
|
0 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 44: Moderate response
|
2 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 44: Good response
|
15 participants
|
87 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 48: No response
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 48: Moderate response
|
2 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 48: Good response
|
14 participants
|
90 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 52: No response
|
0 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 52: Moderate response
|
3 participants
|
12 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Week 52: Good response
|
12 participants
|
90 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Early Withdrawal: No response
|
0 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Early Withdrawal: Moderate response
|
1 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response (Good, Moderate or No Response) Based on DAS28-ESR
Early Withdrawal: Good response
|
4 participants
|
9 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, patient and physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) VAS (0 cm= no disease activity and 10 cm= worst disease activity), and CRP in milligrams per liter (mg/L). SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI ≤3.3 indicates clinical remission, \>3.3 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=136 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Baseline
|
31.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.892
|
32.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.620
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 2
|
-9.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.406
|
-6.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.710
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 4
|
-12.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.502
|
-13.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.666
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 8
|
-19.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.978
|
-17.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.900
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 12
|
-14.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.003
|
-20.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.739
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 16
|
-19.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.649
|
-21.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.945
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 20
|
-23.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.015
|
-20.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.630
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 24
|
-24.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.469
|
-23.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.417
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 28
|
-24.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.554
|
-23.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.418
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 32
|
-22.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.850
|
-24.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.399
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 36
|
-26.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.795
|
-24.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.268
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 40
|
-27.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.280
|
-25.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.210
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 44
|
-27.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.851
|
-26.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.835
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 48
|
-26.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.615
|
-26.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.189
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 52
|
-27.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.351
|
-26.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.791
|
|
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at early withdrawal
|
-18.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.681
|
-9.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.533
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
The CDAI is the numerical sum of four outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, patient and physician's global assessment of disease activity assessed on 0-10 cm VAS (0 cm= no disease activity and 10 cm= worst disease activity). CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI ≤2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=139 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Baseline
|
29.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.209
|
30.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.953
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 2
|
-8.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.433
|
-5.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.323
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 4
|
-11.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.062
|
-12.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.137
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 8
|
-17.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.289
|
-15.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.873
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 12
|
-15.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.216
|
-18.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.895
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 16
|
-20.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.694
|
-19.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.124
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 20
|
-22.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.545
|
-19.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.433
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 24
|
-22.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.720
|
-21.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.825
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 28
|
-23.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.573
|
-21.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.585
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 32
|
-21.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.019
|
-23.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.842
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 36
|
-24.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.854
|
-23.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.263
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 40
|
-25.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.488
|
-24.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.282
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 44
|
-25.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.971
|
-24.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.186
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 48
|
-25.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.718
|
-24.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.645
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 52
|
-25.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.049
|
-24.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.599
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at early withdrawal
|
-17.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.667
|
-8.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.909
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 68. A reduction in number of tender joints compared to baseline indicates improvement. The outcome is reported as the percent change from baseline to end of treatment (52 weeks).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=15 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=106 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 68 Joints at Week 52
|
-83.12 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.607
|
-80.44 percent change
Standard Deviation 41.226
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of tender joints compared to baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=139 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Baseline
|
10.4 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.46
|
12.9 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 2
|
-3.4 tender joints
Standard Deviation 5.62
|
-2.4 tender joints
Standard Deviation 5.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 4
|
-3.9 tender joints
Standard Deviation 5.80
|
-5.4 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 8
|
-6.6 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.41
|
-6.4 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 12
|
-6.0 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.71
|
-8.0 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 16
|
-7.9 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.35
|
-8.2 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 20
|
-8.5 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.59
|
-8.3 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 24
|
-8.3 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.41
|
-9.3 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 28
|
-8.7 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.26
|
-9.2 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 32
|
-7.6 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.64
|
-10.1 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 36
|
-9.4 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.25
|
-9.7 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 40
|
-10.1 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.64
|
-10.3 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 44
|
-9.7 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.46
|
-10.4 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 48
|
-9.6 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.36
|
-10.5 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 52
|
-9.4 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.15
|
-10.4 tender joints
Standard Deviation 8.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total TJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at early withdrawal
|
-7.0 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.24
|
-3.3 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 66. A reduction in number of swollen joints compared to baseline indicates improvement. The outcome is reported as the percent change from baseline to end of treatment (52 weeks).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=16 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=102 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 66 Joints at Week 52
|
-89.31 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.059
|
-74.77 percent change
Standard Deviation 66.277
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of swollen joints compared to baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=139 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 32
|
-5.4 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.10
|
-4.8 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 36
|
-6.5 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.57
|
-4.9 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 40
|
-6.6 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.12
|
-5.0 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 44
|
-6.6 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.28
|
-5.2 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 48
|
-6.4 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.83
|
-5.0 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 52
|
-6.3 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.81
|
-5.1 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at early withdrawal
|
-5.8 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.59
|
-1.7 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 24
|
-5.9 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.12
|
-4.7 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 28
|
-6.4 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.90
|
-4.4 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Baseline
|
7.0 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.64
|
5.6 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 2
|
-2.5 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.31
|
-0.8 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 3.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 4
|
-4.2 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 3.79
|
-2.5 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 3.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 8
|
-4.8 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.21
|
-3.2 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 12
|
-4.2 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.37
|
-3.8 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 16
|
-5.3 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.67
|
-3.9 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total SJC on 28 Joints at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at Early Withdrawal
Change at Week 20
|
-5.6 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.08
|
-4.2 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.60
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 to ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Baseline
|
0 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 2
|
7 participants
|
18 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 4
|
9 participants
|
30 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 8
|
3 participants
|
25 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 12
|
6 participants
|
23 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 16
|
3 participants
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 20
|
3 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 24
|
2 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 28
|
4 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 32
|
5 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 36
|
1 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 40
|
3 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 44
|
5 participants
|
10 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 48
|
3 participants
|
12 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Week 52
|
0 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity as Defined by DAS28-ESR ≤3.2
Early withdrawal
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population.
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=worst disease activity). DAS28 scores were calculated as \[0.56 × square root of TJC\] + \[0.28 × square root of SJC\] + \[0.70 × natural log (ESR)\] + \[0.014 × VAS\]. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=higher disease activity. DAS28-ESR \<2.6 implied clinical remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 20
|
11 participants
|
75 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 24
|
14 participants
|
76 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Baseline
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 2
|
1 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 4
|
2 participants
|
34 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 8
|
5 participants
|
53 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 12
|
6 participants
|
66 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 16
|
10 participants
|
72 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 28
|
14 participants
|
73 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 32
|
12 participants
|
80 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 36
|
14 participants
|
80 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 40
|
13 participants
|
81 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 44
|
10 participants
|
80 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 48
|
11 participants
|
78 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Week 52
|
12 participants
|
80 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6
Early withdrawal
|
3 participants
|
7 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), follow-up Week 4 (up to Week 56), and follow-up Week 8 (up to Week 60)Population: FAS population.
Results are reported for number of participants who had non-biologic DMARD/corticosteroid dose reductions and/or discontinuation by reasons for dose reductions or discontinuation (safety reasons, discomfort, lack of efficacy, other reasons, and unknown reasons). Participants may be included under more than one reason.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Baseline: Safety
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Baseline: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Baseline: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Baseline: Other
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Baseline: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 2: Safety
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 2: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 2: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 2: Other
|
0 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 2: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 4: Safety
|
0 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 4: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 4: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 4: Other
|
1 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 4: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 8: Safety
|
0 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 8: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 8: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 8: Other
|
1 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 8: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 12: Safety
|
0 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 12: Discomfort 8
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 12: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 12: Other
|
2 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 12: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 16: Safety
|
0 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 16: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 16: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 16: Other
|
2 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 16: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 20: Safety
|
0 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 20: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 20: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 20: Other
|
2 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 20: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 24: Safety
|
0 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 24:Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 24: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 24: Other
|
1 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 24: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 28: Safety
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 28: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 28: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 28: Other
|
1 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 28: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 32: Safety
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 32: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 32: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 32: Other
|
1 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 32: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 36: Safety
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 36: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 36: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 36: Other
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 36: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 40: Safety
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 40: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 40: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 40: Other
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 40: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 44: Safety
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 44: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 44: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 44: Other
|
0 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 44: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 48: Safety
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 48: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 48: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 48: Other
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 48: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 52: Safety
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 52: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 52: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 52: Other
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Week 52: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Early withdrawal: Safety
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Early withdrawal: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Early withdrawal: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Early withdrawal: Other
|
1 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Early withdrawal: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Follow-up Week 4: Safety
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Follow-up Week 4: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Follow-up Week 4: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Follow-up Week 4: Other
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Follow-up Week 4: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Follow-up Week 8: Safety
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Follow-up Week 8: Discomfort
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Follow-up Week 8: Lack of efficacy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Follow-up Week 8: Other
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-Biologic DMARD/Corticosteroid Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation
Follow-up Week 8: Unknown
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants who were evaluable for this outcome. Results are provided for single arm as participants in "Tocilizumab Monotherapy" arm did not receive methotrexate.
Methotrexate adherence was determined from responses to the question 'Over the last 3 months you were prescribed 12 doses of methotrexate, how many (approximately) have you taken?' Adherence (%) was calculated as: (Approximate number of doses taken/12)\*100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=97 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Methotrexate Adherence as Assessed by Methotrexate Adherence Questionnaire
Baseline
|
96.82 percentage of methotrexate adherence
Standard Deviation 7.747
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Methotrexate Adherence as Assessed by Methotrexate Adherence Questionnaire
Week 12
|
92.92 percentage of methotrexate adherence
Standard Deviation 14.412
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Methotrexate Adherence as Assessed by Methotrexate Adherence Questionnaire
Week 24
|
91.54 percentage of methotrexate adherence
Standard Deviation 20.915
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Methotrexate Adherence as Assessed by Methotrexate Adherence Questionnaire
Week 36
|
90.14 percentage of methotrexate adherence
Standard Deviation 21.456
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Methotrexate Adherence as Assessed by Methotrexate Adherence Questionnaire
Week 52
|
95.28 percentage of methotrexate adherence
Standard Deviation 11.417
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Methotrexate Adherence as Assessed by Methotrexate Adherence Questionnaire
Early withdrawal
|
90.69 percentage of methotrexate adherence
Standard Deviation 18.367
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population.
Patient global assessment of disease activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS where 0 mm=no disease activity and 100 mm=maximum disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Baseline
|
59.6 mm
Standard Deviation 26.94
|
62.3 mm
Standard Deviation 20.72
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 2
|
50.3 mm
Standard Deviation 24.01
|
54.5 mm
Standard Deviation 22.12
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 4
|
46.4 mm
Standard Deviation 26.43
|
42.3 mm
Standard Deviation 23.22
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 8
|
35.8 mm
Standard Deviation 24.73
|
36.2 mm
Standard Deviation 24.43
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 12
|
41.3 mm
Standard Deviation 27.67
|
32.1 mm
Standard Deviation 23.91
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 16
|
29.6 mm
Standard Deviation 21.59
|
29.2 mm
Standard Deviation 22.55
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 20
|
25.7 mm
Standard Deviation 23.77
|
29.9 mm
Standard Deviation 22.99
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 24
|
23.8 mm
Standard Deviation 19.55
|
26.6 mm
Standard Deviation 21.92
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 28
|
23.2 mm
Standard Deviation 16.47
|
26.7 mm
Standard Deviation 23.12
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 32
|
24.0 mm
Standard Deviation 17.81
|
24.3 mm
Standard Deviation 21.66
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 36
|
24.1 mm
Standard Deviation 19.13
|
22.3 mm
Standard Deviation 21.86
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 40
|
22.5 mm
Standard Deviation 19.31
|
21.4 mm
Standard Deviation 20.81
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 44
|
22.7 mm
Standard Deviation 20.62
|
22.0 mm
Standard Deviation 22.83
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 48
|
22.9 mm
Standard Deviation 23.31
|
18.9 mm
Standard Deviation 20.57
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Week 52
|
20.6 mm
Standard Deviation 18.96
|
21.4 mm
Standard Deviation 23.07
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS Score
Early withdrawal
|
30.8 mm
Standard Deviation 28.78
|
52.4 mm
Standard Deviation 24.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS populations.
This assessment represents the participant's assessment of his/her current level of pain on a 100 mm horizontal VAS where 0 mm= no pain to 100 mm= unbearable pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 28
|
24.8 mm
Standard Deviation 19.15
|
25.6 mm
Standard Deviation 23.18
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Baseline
|
50.5 mm
Standard Deviation 23.78
|
57.5 mm
Standard Deviation 21.06
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 2
|
46.1 mm
Standard Deviation 22.43
|
51.1 mm
Standard Deviation 22.58
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 4
|
47.0 mm
Standard Deviation 26.69
|
42.4 mm
Standard Deviation 23.80
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 8
|
37.8 mm
Standard Deviation 25.75
|
35.3 mm
Standard Deviation 24.30
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 12
|
40.9 mm
Standard Deviation 29.56
|
30.8 mm
Standard Deviation 23.29
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 16
|
29.7 mm
Standard Deviation 20.83
|
26.8 mm
Standard Deviation 22.61
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 20
|
27.6 mm
Standard Deviation 25.48
|
28.6 mm
Standard Deviation 23.74
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 24
|
29.9 mm
Standard Deviation 22.76
|
25.2 mm
Standard Deviation 22.16
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 32
|
25.1 mm
Standard Deviation 17.92
|
22.6 mm
Standard Deviation 21.30
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 36
|
29.6 mm
Standard Deviation 20.03
|
22.1 mm
Standard Deviation 21.68
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 40
|
27.6 mm
Standard Deviation 22.70
|
20.9 mm
Standard Deviation 21.24
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 44
|
26.7 mm
Standard Deviation 24.25
|
20.0 mm
Standard Deviation 21.26
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 48
|
28.6 mm
Standard Deviation 28.98
|
17.6 mm
Standard Deviation 19.66
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Week 52
|
22.4 mm
Standard Deviation 19.70
|
19.0 mm
Standard Deviation 19.83
|
|
Patient Pain VAS Score
Early withdrawal
|
30.4 mm
Standard Deviation 29.57
|
51.6 mm
Standard Deviation 26.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population.
The HAQ-DI questionnaire measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life. It measures the participant's ability to perform everyday tasks. The index consists of 20 questions regarding the function of the upper and lower extremities. These questions are summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities over past week. Each question is evaluated according to the degree of severity on a 4-point scale. Total score for HAQ-DI was the average of all questions and ranges from 0 = without any difficulty to 3 = unable to do.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Baseline
|
1.806 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5551
|
1.738 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6406
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 2
|
1.558 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7319
|
1.659 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6210
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 4
|
1.616 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7720
|
1.546 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7351
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 8
|
1.508 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7597
|
1.404 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8115
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 12
|
1.488 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9304
|
1.333 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8272
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 16
|
1.351 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9586
|
1.312 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8621
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 20
|
1.409 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9071
|
1.318 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8608
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 24
|
1.330 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8379
|
1.261 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8915
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 28
|
1.330 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9412
|
1.221 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8730
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 32
|
1.351 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8816
|
1.232 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8870
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 36
|
1.432 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9048
|
1.170 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8757
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 40
|
1.479 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8975
|
1.199 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8908
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 44
|
1.442 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9392
|
1.130 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9206
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 48
|
1.361 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9685
|
1.114 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8815
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 52
|
1.338 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9796
|
1.154 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9187
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Early withdrawal
|
1.252 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1232
|
1.756 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7820
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population.
The FACIT-F score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Baseline
|
18.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.14
|
24.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.55
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 2
|
23.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.37
|
27.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.03
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 4
|
25.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.28
|
30.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.10
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 8
|
30.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.58
|
32.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.91
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 12
|
28.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.71
|
33.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.85
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 16
|
31.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.80
|
34.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.53
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 20
|
33.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.57
|
34.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.05
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 24
|
33.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.28
|
35.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.98
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 28
|
32.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.06
|
35.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.59
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 32
|
34.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.68
|
36.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.32
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 36
|
30.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.62
|
36.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.48
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 40
|
31.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.87
|
37.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.69
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 44
|
31.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.02
|
37.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.75
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 48
|
31.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.63
|
37.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.73
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Week 52
|
33.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.17
|
38.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.16
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score
Early withdrawal
|
31.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
24.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and at early withdrawal (up to Week 52)Population: FAS population.
A diary card was provided to participants to record home injections. Participants were asked to return all empty drug supply boxes, unused pre-filled syringe, and diary cards to the clinic at each visit as a measure of drug accountability and participant compliance. A participant was considered compliant if the participant correctly administered all scheduled doses of SC tocilizumab during the assessment period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Baseline
|
21 participants
|
137 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 2
|
20 participants
|
126 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 4
|
20 participants
|
132 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 8
|
18 participants
|
124 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 12
|
18 participants
|
121 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 16
|
19 participants
|
120 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 20
|
18 participants
|
114 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 24
|
16 participants
|
107 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 28
|
19 participants
|
112 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 32
|
17 participants
|
111 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 36
|
17 participants
|
105 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 40
|
16 participants
|
104 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 44
|
16 participants
|
102 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 48
|
13 participants
|
107 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Week 52
|
16 participants
|
98 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Compliant to Tocilizumab Treatment as Measured by Diary Cards and Return Records
Early withdrawal
|
4 participants
|
27 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), and follow-up visit (8 weeks after last dose of tocilizumab, up to 60 weeks)Population: FAS population.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Tocilizumab Antibodies
Baseline
|
3 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Tocilizumab Antibodies
Week 12
|
0 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Tocilizumab Antibodies
Week 24
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Tocilizumab Antibodies
Early withdrawal
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Tocilizumab Antibodies
Follow-up visit
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), and follow-up visit (8 weeks after last dose of tocilizumab, up to 60 weeks)Population: FAS population.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Serum Levels of Tocilizumab
Baseline
|
0.0000 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.0082 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 0.09619
|
|
Serum Levels of Tocilizumab
Week 12
|
35.3953 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 22.69069
|
40.2529 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 21.05801
|
|
Serum Levels of Tocilizumab
Week 24
|
53.0416 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 39.06367
|
43.9047 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 30.41603
|
|
Serum Levels of Tocilizumab
Early withdrawal
|
44.7160 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 38.81521
|
17.6160 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 22.92477
|
|
Serum Levels of Tocilizumab
Follow-up visit
|
0.0597 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 0.10335
|
2.3123 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 7.40931
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), and follow-up visit (8 weeks after last dose of tocilizumab, up to 60 weeks)Population: FAS population.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 Participants
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Serum Levels of Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptors (sIL-6Rs)
Baseline
|
43.63 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 10.947
|
42.40 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 12.087
|
|
Serum Levels of Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptors (sIL-6Rs)
Week 12
|
577.42 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 175.649
|
548.70 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 131.079
|
|
Serum Levels of Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptors (sIL-6Rs)
Week 24
|
602.25 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 158.541
|
521.07 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 160.464
|
|
Serum Levels of Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptors (sIL-6Rs)
Early withdrawal
|
639.75 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 99.644
|
327.95 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 229.481
|
|
Serum Levels of Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptors (sIL-6Rs)
Follow-up visit
|
132.23 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 93.048
|
125.07 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 211.038
|
Adverse Events
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 participants at risk
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 participants at risk
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Arthritis bacterial
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.71%
1/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.71%
1/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.00%
0/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.00%
0/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.71%
1/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental overdose
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.71%
1/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.00%
0/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.71%
1/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.00%
0/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Costochondritis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.71%
1/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.00%
0/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary fibrosis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.71%
1/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Drug eruption
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.71%
1/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Knee arthroplasty
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.00%
0/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=21 participants at risk
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy for 52 weeks.
|
Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Other DMARDs
n=140 participants at risk
Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
8.6%
12/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
7.9%
11/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
5.7%
8/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
5.7%
8/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
19.3%
27/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
15.0%
21/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
2.1%
3/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
12.9%
18/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
9.3%
13/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
10.0%
14/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
5.0%
7/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
9.3%
13/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
5.7%
8/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
5.0%
7/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
4.3%
6/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
5.0%
7/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
10.0%
14/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
9.3%
13/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
3.6%
5/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
8.6%
12/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
7.1%
10/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
7.9%
11/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
7.9%
11/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
23.8%
5/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
23.6%
33/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
28.6%
6/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
17.9%
25/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
14.3%
20/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
23.8%
5/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
11.4%
16/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
7.1%
10/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection viral
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
0.00%
0/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
22.9%
32/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
15.0%
21/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
12.9%
18/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
11.4%
16/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
5.0%
7/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
22.1%
31/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
|
General disorders
Injection site bruising
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
8.6%
12/140 • Baseline up to Week 60
FAS population
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER