Magnamosis First-in-human Study of Feasibility and Safety
NCT ID: NCT02043392
Last Updated: 2023-06-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-05-01
2017-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Magnet Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Gastric Surgery
NCT06915337
SEAM Trial: Sutureless End to End Anastomosis by Magnetic Compression
NCT05046730
Feasibility Study of a New Fistula Pouching System
NCT00294450
Tissue Reinforcement of Incisional Closure Among High Risk Patients
NCT03148496
NPWT in Patients Undergoing Surgical Procedures for Management of GI Malignancies
NCT04955730
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Magnamosis
Create an intestinal anastomosis using the Magnamosis Magnetic Compression Anastomosis (Magnamosis) device to re-establish intestinal continuity that would otherwise be performed using sutures or stapling devices
Magnamosis
Single-use, sterile device enables creation of a circular compression intestinal anastomosis. Device is comprised of matched pair of self-centering rare earth magnets encased in medical grade polycarbonate. Geometry of magnets' mating surfaces applies force on inside of mated rings to produce compression necrosis of intervening intestinal walls. Lesser force on outside of mated rings produces inflammatory healing of the two co-apted intestinal walls. Internal lumen creates patency of the anastomosis to prevent intestinal obstruction during compression anastomosis creation. In 5-10 days, mated rings with necrotic tissue falls into intestinal lumen and is naturally expelled with stool, leaving a well-healed anastomosis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Magnamosis
Single-use, sterile device enables creation of a circular compression intestinal anastomosis. Device is comprised of matched pair of self-centering rare earth magnets encased in medical grade polycarbonate. Geometry of magnets' mating surfaces applies force on inside of mated rings to produce compression necrosis of intervening intestinal walls. Lesser force on outside of mated rings produces inflammatory healing of the two co-apted intestinal walls. Internal lumen creates patency of the anastomosis to prevent intestinal obstruction during compression anastomosis creation. In 5-10 days, mated rings with necrotic tissue falls into intestinal lumen and is naturally expelled with stool, leaving a well-healed anastomosis.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Requires non-emergent operation to create an intestinal anastomosis for maintenance of intestinal continuity in which the Magnamosis device can be used instead of sutures or staples.
* Able to read, speak and understand English
* Demonstrates an understanding of the study procedures and risks, and can provide signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Intestine too small to accommodate 23-mm diameter device; or
* Intestine so large that 23-mm diameter anastomotic lumen is not adequate; or
* Intestine too thickened to allow two halves of device to come together with sufficient force to produce compression anastomosis (e.g. inflamed or scarred intestinal wall; a foreign body like staples in anastomosis); or
* Inadequate blood supply
* Requires anastomosis of the stomach
* Bowel is not well perfused
* Anastomosis will be under tension
* Anatomic reconstruction requires crossing a staple line
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score 4 or 5;
* Requires more than one anastomosis during operation;
* Women possibly or known to be pregnant;
* Inability to obtain pre-authorization from insurance company or third party payor
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Michael Harrison
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Harrison
Professor, Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael R Harrison, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UCSF Professor Emeritus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco - Parnassus Campus
San Francisco, California, United States
UCSF-Mission Bay
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG, Pichakron KO, Harrison MR. Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jan;44(1):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.044.
Pichakron KO, Jelin EB, Hirose S, Curran PF, Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Fechter R, Strange M, Harrison MR. Magnamosis II: Magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jan;212(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.031.
Gonzales KD, Douglas G, Pichakron KO, Kwiat DA, Gallardo SG, Encinas JL, Hirose S, Harrison MR. Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jun;47(6):1291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.042.
Wall J, Diana M, Leroy J, Deruijter V, Gonzales KD, Lindner V, Harrison M, Marescaux J. MAGNAMOSIS IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Endoscopy. 2013 Aug;45(8):643-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344119. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
Graves CE, Co C, Hsi RS, Kwiat D, Imamura-Ching J, Harrison MR, Stoller ML. Magnetic Compression Anastomosis (Magnamosis): First-In-Human Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Nov;225(5):676-681.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.07.1062. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
website with device information
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13-11536
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.