Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of the Criteria Establishing the Need for Re-treatment With Ranibizumab Upon Relapse in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia. (NCT NCT02034006)
NCT ID: NCT02034006
Last Updated: 2019-02-18
Results Overview
Presence of active leakage on fluorescein angiography (FAG) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2 and month 6. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of active leakage (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of active leakage was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. \*NE = Not evaluable
COMPLETED
PHASE3
200 participants
Screening, Month 2, Month 6
2019-02-18
Participant Flow
Two hundred fifteen (215) subjects were screened in this study (i.e. provided written informed consent). Two hundred (200) subjects underwent baseline visit and received at least one injection of ranibizumab.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
200
|
|
Overall Study
Once Treated Patients
|
70
|
|
Overall Study
Re-treated Patients
|
130
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
186
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of the Criteria Establishing the Need for Re-treatment With Ranibizumab Upon Relapse in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.27 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.03 • n=5 Participants
|
62.12 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.52 • n=7 Participants
|
61.82 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.67 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
147 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Month 2, Month 6Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and underwent fluorescein angiography at that time point.
Presence of active leakage on fluorescein angiography (FAG) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2 and month 6. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of active leakage (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of active leakage was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. \*NE = Not evaluable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Active Leakage
Month 6: Active leakage, Yes
|
4 Patients
|
40 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Active Leakage
Screening: Active leakage, No
|
3 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Active Leakage
Screening: Active leakage, Yes
|
61 Patients
|
121 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Active Leakage
Screening: Active leakage, NE
|
0 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Active Leakage
Screening: Active leakage, Missing
|
0 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Active Leakage
Month 2: Active leakage, No
|
58 Patients
|
61 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Active Leakage
Month 2: Active leakage, Yes
|
3 Patients
|
56 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Active Leakage
Month 2: Active leakage, NE
|
0 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Active Leakage
Month 6: Active leakage, No
|
55 Patients
|
73 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Active Leakage
Month 6: Active leakage, NE
|
1 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and underwent OCT at that time point.
Presence of macular edema from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of macular edema (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of macular edema was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. \*NE = Not evaluable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Screening: Macular Edema, No
|
38 Patients
|
63 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Screening: Macular Edema, Yes
|
28 Patients
|
65 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Screening: Macular Edema, NE
|
3 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Month 2: Macular Edema, No
|
59 Patients
|
103 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Month 2: Macular Edema, Yes
|
3 Patients
|
24 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Month 2: Macular Edema, NE
|
1 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Month 6: Macular Edema, No
|
57 Patients
|
101 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Month 6: Macular Edema, Yes
|
2 Patients
|
24 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Month 6: Macular Edema, NE
|
1 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Month 12: Macular Edema, No
|
56 Patients
|
108 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Month 12: Macular Edema, Yes
|
4 Patients
|
15 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Macular Edema
Month 12: Macular Edema, NE
|
1 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and underwent OCT at that time point.
Presence of cysts from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of cysts (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of cysts was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. \*NE = Not evaluable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Screening: Cysts, No
|
41 Patients
|
79 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Screening: Cysts, Yes
|
27 Patients
|
50 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Screening: Cysts, NE
|
1 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Month 2: Cysts, No
|
60 Patients
|
94 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Month 2: Cysts, Yes
|
2 Patients
|
32 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Month 2: Cysts, NE
|
1 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Month 2: Cysts, Missing
|
0 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Month 6: Cysts, No
|
57 Patients
|
98 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Month 6: Cysts, Yes
|
2 Patients
|
27 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Month 6: Cysts, NE
|
1 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Month 12: Cysts, No
|
57 Patients
|
97 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Month 12: Cysts, Yes
|
3 Patients
|
26 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Cysts
Month 12: Cysts, NE
|
1 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and underwent OCT at that time point.
Presence of Intra-retinal fluid from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of Intra-retinal fluid (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of Intra-retinal fluid was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. \*NE = Not evaluable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Screening: Intra-retinal fluid, No
|
19 Patients
|
37 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Screening: Intra-retinal fluid, Yes
|
49 Patients
|
90 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Screening: Intra-retinal fluid, NE
|
1 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Month 2: Intra-retinal fluid, No
|
55 Patients
|
77 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Month 2: Intra-retinal fluid, Yes
|
7 Patients
|
50 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Month 2: Intra-retinal fluid, NE
|
1 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Month 6: Intra-retinal fluid, No
|
57 Patients
|
85 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Month 6: Intra-retinal fluid, Yes
|
1 Patients
|
38 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Month 6: Intra-retinal fluid, NE
|
2 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Month 12: Intra-retinal fluid, No
|
58 Patients
|
96 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Month 12: Intra-retinal fluid, Yes
|
2 Patients
|
26 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid
Month 12: Intra-retinal fluid, NE
|
1 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and underwent OCT at that time point and previous visit.
Central subfield thickness (CSFT) from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of change in CSFT versus previous visit. For retreated patients, the change in CSFT was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT)
Month 2 Vs. Screening : CSFT
|
-16.15 micromilimeter(um)
Standard Deviation 86.65
|
-34.28 micromilimeter(um)
Standard Deviation 78.01
|
|
Change in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT)
Month 6 Vs. Month 2: CSFT
|
-11.04 micromilimeter(um)
Standard Deviation 61.06
|
-15.83 micromilimeter(um)
Standard Deviation 70.74
|
|
Change in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT)
Month 12 Vs. Month 6: CSFT
|
1.29 micromilimeter(um)
Standard Deviation 62.55
|
8.64 micromilimeter(um)
Standard Deviation 76.79
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and underwent OCT at that time point and the previous visit.
Central subfield volume (CSV) from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of change in CSV versus previous visit. For retreated patients, the change in CSV was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Subfield Volume (CSV)
Month 2 Vs. Screening : CSV
|
-0.02 mm^3
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.02 mm^3
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
|
Change in Central Subfield Volume (CSV)
Month 6 Vs. Month 2: CSV
|
-0.00 mm^3
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.01 mm^3
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
|
Change in Central Subfield Volume (CSV)
Month 12 Vs. Month 6: CSV
|
-0.00 mm^3
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
0.01 mm^3
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and underwent OCT at that time point.
Presence of sub-retinal fluid from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. The regression model for sub-retinal fluid was not valid because "Yes" was reported in almost all subjects causing a quasi-complete separation of data points. \*NE = Not evaluable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Month 12: Sub-retinal fluid, Yes
|
0 Patients
|
8 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Screening: Sub-retinal fluid, No
|
43 Patients
|
65 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Screening: Sub-retinal fluid, Yes
|
25 Patients
|
61 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Screening: Sub-retinal fluid, NE
|
1 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Month 2: Sub-retinal fluid, No
|
58 Patients
|
108 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Month 2: Sub-retinal fluid, Yes
|
2 Patients
|
17 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Month 2: Sub-retinal fluid, NE
|
3 Patients
|
4 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Month 6: Sub-retinal fluid, No
|
58 Patients
|
109 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Month 6: Sub-retinal fluid, Yes
|
0 Patients
|
14 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Month 6: Sub-retinal fluid, NE
|
2 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Month 12: Sub-retinal fluid, No
|
60 Patients
|
113 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Sub-retinal Fluid
Month 12: Sub-retinal fluid, NE
|
1 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and underwent ocular examination during that time point.
Presence of clinically significant abnormalities was assessed at baseline, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of clinically significant abnormalities (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of clinically significant abnormalities was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Baseline: Clinically Significant Abnormal, No
|
61 Patients
|
103 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Baseline: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Yes
|
9 Patients
|
27 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Baseline: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Missing
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 1: Clinically Significant Abnorma, No
|
60 Patients
|
106 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 1: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Yes
|
6 Patients
|
24 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 1: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Missing
|
4 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 2: Clinically Significant Abnormal, No
|
60 Patients
|
103 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 2: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Yes
|
5 Patients
|
26 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 2:Clinically Significant Abnormal, Missing
|
5 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 3: Clinically Significant Abnormal, No
|
56 Patients
|
108 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 3: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Yes
|
7 Patients
|
20 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 3: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Missing
|
7 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 6: Clinically Significant Abnormal, No
|
59 Patients
|
110 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 6: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Yes
|
3 Patients
|
18 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 6: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Missing
|
8 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 12: Clinically Significant Abnormal, No
|
61 Patients
|
116 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 12: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Yes
|
2 Patients
|
12 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Presence/Absence of Clinically Significant Abnormalities
Month 12: Clinically Significant Abnormal, Missing
|
7 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab with improvement in BCVA \< 5 letters from baseline at that time point.
Improvement in BCVA \< 5 letters (Yes/No) was assessed at month1, month 2, month 3, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of improvement in BCVA \< 5 letters (Yes/No) which was reported as Gain \>= 5 letters versus Gain \< 5 letters. For retreated patients, Gain \>= 5 letters and Gain \< 5 letters were considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 5 Letters
Month 1: Gain >= 5 letters
|
37 Patients
|
69 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 5 Letters
Month 1: Gain < 5 letters
|
14 Patients
|
28 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 5 Letters
Month 2: Gain >= 5 letters
|
38 Patients
|
70 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 5 Letters
Month 2: Gain < 5 letters
|
12 Patients
|
25 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 5 Letters
Month 3: Gain >= 5 letters
|
37 Patients
|
74 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 5 Letters
Month 3: Gain < 5 letters
|
15 Patients
|
20 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 5 Letters
Month 6: Gain >= 5 letters
|
40 Patients
|
70 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 5 Letters
Month 6: Gain < 5 letters
|
8 Patients
|
22 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 5 Letters
Month 12: Gain >= 5 letters
|
43 Patients
|
69 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 5 Letters
Month 12: Gain < 5 letters
|
8 Patients
|
23 Patients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab with improvement in BCVA \< 10 letters from baseline to that time point.
Improvement in BCVA \< 10 letters (Yes/No) was assessed at month1, month 2, month 3, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of improvement in BCVA \< 10 letters (Yes/No) which was reported as Gain \>= 10 letters versus Gain \< 10 letters. For retreated patients, Gain \>= 10 letters and Gain \< 10 letters were considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 10 Letters
Month 1: Gain >= 10 letters
|
13 Patients
|
27 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 10 Letters
Month 1: Gain < 10 letters
|
38 Patients
|
70 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 10 Letters
Month 2: Gain >= 10 letters
|
20 Patients
|
40 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 10 Letters
Month 2: Gain < 10 letters
|
30 Patients
|
55 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 10 Letters
Month 3: Gain >= 10 letters
|
22 Patients
|
41 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 10 Letters
Month 3: Gain < 10 letters
|
30 Patients
|
53 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 10 Letters
Month 6: Gain >= 10 letters
|
29 Patients
|
50 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 10 Letters
Month 6: Gain < 10 letters
|
19 Patients
|
42 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 10 Letters
Month 12: Gain >= 10 letters
|
28 Patients
|
48 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients Treated and Re-treated Based on Improvement in Best Corrective Visual Acuity (BCVA) < 10 Letters
Month 12: Gain < 10 letters
|
23 Patients
|
44 Patients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and evaluable BCVA at baseline and that time point.
Changes from baseline in BCVA are described for the ETDRS parameter considering the following categories at each assessment: "no change" if the change was equal to 0 letter, "worsening" if change \< 0 letter , "improvement" if change \> 0 letter. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of change from baseline in BCVA (improved/worsened/stable) which was reported as Improved versus no change and worsened versus no change. For retreated patients, this variable was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 1: No change
|
7 Patients
|
18 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 1: Worsening
|
8 Patients
|
15 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 1: Improvement
|
51 Patients
|
97 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 2: No change
|
6 Patients
|
9 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 2: Worsening
|
9 Patients
|
25 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 2: Improvement
|
50 Patients
|
95 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 3: No change
|
3 Patients
|
9 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 3: Worsening
|
8 Patients
|
25 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 3: Improvement
|
52 Patients
|
94 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 6: No change
|
5 Patients
|
6 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 6: Worsening
|
9 Patients
|
30 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 6: Improvement
|
48 Patients
|
92 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 12: No change
|
3 Patients
|
7 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 12: Worsening
|
9 Patients
|
29 Patients
|
|
Number of Patients in Different Categories of Changes From Baseline in BCVA
Month 12: Improvement
|
51 Patients
|
92 Patients
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. The study eyes of the patients belonging to the FAS were analyzed.
Change from baseline in BCVA (Best Corrected Visual Acuity) was Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score. Patients with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 78 to 24 in the study eye were included; A higher score represents better functioning of the study eye. A positive change from baseline shows improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=200 study eyes
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 on Study Eye
Change at 6 month
|
7.51 letters
Standard Deviation 11.68
|
—
|
|
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 on Study Eye
Change at 12 month
|
8.42 letters
Standard Deviation 12.81
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab
Mean number of ranibizumab injection is reported as number of injections per patient.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=200 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Number of Ranibizumab Injection
|
2.41 injections
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab
Time to re-treatment, defined as time in months from the data of first dose of ranibizumab to the date of re-treatment, was evaluated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Re-treatment
|
2.56 Months
Standard Deviation 2.17
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12Population: Safety Population: all subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Number of patients with any systemic AE, with serious systemic AE, with an ocular AE, with an ocular serious AE are reported
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=200 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Having Ocular and/or Systemic Adverse Event (AE)
Any systemic Adverse Event
|
30 Patients
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients Having Ocular and/or Systemic Adverse Event (AE)
Serious systemic Adverse Event
|
5 Patients
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients Having Ocular and/or Systemic Adverse Event (AE)
Ocular Adverse Event
|
41 Patients
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients Having Ocular and/or Systemic Adverse Event (AE)
Ocular serious adverse event
|
2 Patients
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2, Month 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab with data at both timepoints.
Patient quality of life was assessed by Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire. IVI is a 32-item instrument, either self- or interviewer-administered, developed to measure the impact of vision impairment on daily activities in five domains. The 32 items were divided into 5 domains as follows: Leisure and work (items 1 to 5), Social and consumer interaction (items 6 to 10 and items 23-24), Household and personal care (items 11 to 14 and items 20-21), Mobility (items 15 to 19 and item 22), Emotional reaction to vision loss (items 25 to 32). Responses to the IVI items were rated on a five-category Likert scale: not at all, 0; hardly at all, 1; a little, 2; a fair amount, 3; a lot, 4; and can't do because of eyesight, 5. Total score was an arithmetic average of the items rated between 0 (the best score) and 5 (the worst score). A negative change indicates improvement. Data was computed on items with non missing response
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
n=70 Participants
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
n=130 Participants
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Patient Quality of Life From Baseline to Month 2 and Month 12
Change at Month 2
|
-0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
-0.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
|
Change in Patient Quality of Life From Baseline to Month 2 and Month 12
Change at month 12
|
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
Adverse Events
Ranibizumab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=200 participants at risk
All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block
|
0.50%
1/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.50%
1/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.50%
1/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Klebsiella sepsis
|
0.50%
1/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Expired product administered (Study Eye)
|
1.0%
2/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
|
0.50%
1/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
|
0.50%
1/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=200 participants at risk
All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Choroidal neovascularisation (Non-study Eye)
|
1.5%
3/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Choroidal neovascularisation (Study Eye)
|
3.5%
7/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage (Study Eye)
|
2.0%
4/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival hyperaemia (Both Eyes)
|
2.5%
5/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hypertension (Both Eyes)
|
2.0%
4/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
3.5%
7/200 • Adverse events were collected from time of treatment until exit from the study (approximately 12 months)
Safety Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER