Way to Be Active IV (Framing vs Incentives)

NCT ID: NCT02030080

Last Updated: 2017-12-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

288 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Employers are increasingly looking for opportunities to motivate sedentary employees to become more physically active. Workplace walking programs have had mixed success and typically show most improvement among participants that are already fairly active at a baseline. The goal of this study is to determine whether a financial incentive program can motivate sedentary employees to increase the number of steps they walk per day to meet a minimum threshold.

The primary outcome measure is the proportion of days a minimum activity of 7000 steps or more is achieved. Outcomes will be assessed each week for 3 months using incentives followed by 3 months of follow-up without incentives. Secondary outcomes will include the average steps walked per day.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sedentary Lifestyle

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Pedometers Walking Financial incentives Sedentary lifestyle Behavioral economics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Feedback 50th Percentile

At the end of each week, participants will be told the average daily step count for their team for the previous week. They will also be told the average for the 50th percentile in their arm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Teams

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Daily Feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be given daily feedback on whether or not they walked 7000 steps or more the day before.

Feedback 75th Percentile

At the end of each week, participants will be told the average daily step count for their team for the previous week. They will also be told the average for the 75th percentile in their arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Teams

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Framing of feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Daily Feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be given daily feedback on whether or not they walked 7000 steps or more the day before.

Feedback 50th Percentile + Lottery

At the end of each week, participants will be told the average daily step count for their team for the previous week. They will also be told the average for the 50th percentile in their arm. If their team's average daily step count is ≥ 7000 steps, they'll be eligible to collect winnings from a weekly lottery. Teams whose average daily step count is less than 7000 will receive messages about how much they would have won had the team met its goal.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Financial incentives

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Teams

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Daily Feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be given daily feedback on whether or not they walked 7000 steps or more the day before.

Feedback 75th Percentile + Lottery

At the end of each week, participants will be told the average daily step count for their team for the previous week. They will also be told the average for the 75th percentile in their arm. If their team's average daily step count is ≥ 7000 steps, they'll be eligible to collect winnings from a weekly lottery. Teams whose average daily step count is less than 7000 will receive messages about how much they would have won had the team met its goal.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Financial incentives

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Teams

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Framing of feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Daily Feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be given daily feedback on whether or not they walked 7000 steps or more the day before.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Financial incentives

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Teams

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Framing of feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Daily Feedback

Participants will be given daily feedback on whether or not they walked 7000 steps or more the day before.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age greater than 18.
* Participant will need an iPhone or Android smartphone to be able to use the Moves App for tracking steps

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or lactating
* Currently participating in another physical activity study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mitesh Patel, MD, MBA

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Pennsylvania

Kevin Volpp, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pennsylvania

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Patel MS, Volpp KG, Rosin R, Bellamy SL, Small DS, Fletcher MA, Osman-Koss R, Brady JL, Haff N, Lee SM, Wesby L, Hoffer K, Shuttleworth D, Taylor DH, Hilbert V, Zhu J, Yang L, Wang X, Asch DA. A Randomized Trial of Social Comparison Feedback and Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity. Am J Health Promot. 2016 Jul;30(6):416-24. doi: 10.1177/0890117116658195. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27422252 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

819371

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id