Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluating the CG ASSIST Program for Caregiving Dyads (NCT NCT02021565)

NCT ID: NCT02021565

Last Updated: 2018-03-01

Results Overview

Caregiver reported the level of confidence that Veteran care recipient can perform 10 activity of daily living tasks rated on scale of 1-10. Efficacy in task completion reported both with assistance from the informal caregiver and performed independently by the Veteran. Scores range from 10-100 with higher scores reflecting greater transfer efficacy.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

126 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

T1 Baseline and T2 Post Intervention; 4-6 Weeks

Results posted on

2018-03-01

Participant Flow

Recruitment began in December 2013 and ended June 2016. Potential Veterans and informal/family caregivers were identified through the Department of Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. The study was also advertised at community events and in local newspapers.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Immediate Intervention Group
Receives the in-home training intervention in-person immediately after completing the baseline assessment. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (prn): Assistive Technology (AT) Specialists, experts on AT devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform three activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, AT Specialists also recommend AT equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, AT Specialists provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Delayed Intervention Control Group
Receives the in-home training intervention in-person six weeks after completing the initial baseline assessment. This allows for a control comparison group while still providing the intervention to all participants. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (AT) (prn): AT Specialists, experts on AT devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform three activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, AT Specialists also recommend AT equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, AT Specialists provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Baseline Through Intervention
STARTED
72
54
Baseline Through Intervention
Caregivers
36
27
Baseline Through Intervention
Care Recipients
36
27
Baseline Through Intervention
COMPLETED
60
36
Baseline Through Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
12
18
3-month Follow-up
STARTED
60
36
3-month Follow-up
Caregivers
30
18
3-month Follow-up
Care Recipients
30
18
3-month Follow-up
COMPLETED
50
34
3-month Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
10
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Immediate Intervention Group
Receives the in-home training intervention in-person immediately after completing the baseline assessment. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (prn): Assistive Technology (AT) Specialists, experts on AT devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform three activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, AT Specialists also recommend AT equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, AT Specialists provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Delayed Intervention Control Group
Receives the in-home training intervention in-person six weeks after completing the initial baseline assessment. This allows for a control comparison group while still providing the intervention to all participants. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (AT) (prn): AT Specialists, experts on AT devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform three activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, AT Specialists also recommend AT equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, AT Specialists provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Baseline Through Intervention
Death
0
1
Baseline Through Intervention
Withdrawal by Subject
8
8
Baseline Through Intervention
Protocol Violation
0
7
Baseline Through Intervention
Lost to Follow-up
4
2
3-month Follow-up
Death
3
0
3-month Follow-up
Withdrawal by Subject
4
0
3-month Follow-up
Protocol Violation
3
2

Baseline Characteristics

The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Immediate Intervention group=36 dyads (36 caregivers + 36 care recipients = 72 participants). Delayed Intervention Control group=27 dyads(27 caregivers + 27 care recipients = 54 participants).

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Immediate Intervention Group
n=72 Participants
Receives the in-home training intervention immediately after completing the baseline assessment. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (prn): Assistive Technology Specialists (ATSs), experts on assistive technology devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform four activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, ATSs also recommend assistive technology equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, ATSs provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Delayed Intervention Control Group
n=54 Participants
Receives the in-home training intervention six weeks after completing the initial baseline assessment. This allows for a control comparison group while still providing the intervention to all participants. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (prn): Assistive Technology Specialists (ATSs), experts on assistive technology devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform four activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, ATSs also recommend assistive technology equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, ATSs provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Total
n=126 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
Caregiver Age
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=36 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Immediate Intervention group=36 dyads (36 caregivers + 36 care recipients = 72 participants). Delayed Intervention Control group=27 dyads(27 caregivers + 27 care recipients = 54 participants).
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=27 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Immediate Intervention group=36 dyads (36 caregivers + 36 care recipients = 72 participants). Delayed Intervention Control group=27 dyads(27 caregivers + 27 care recipients = 54 participants).
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=63 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Immediate Intervention group=36 dyads (36 caregivers + 36 care recipients = 72 participants). Delayed Intervention Control group=27 dyads(27 caregivers + 27 care recipients = 54 participants).
Age, Customized
Care Recipient Age
74.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=36 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Immediate Intervention group=36 dyads (36 caregivers + 36 care recipients = 72 participants). Delayed Intervention Control group=27 dyads(27 caregivers + 27 care recipients = 54 participants).
77.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=27 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Immediate Intervention group=36 dyads (36 caregivers + 36 care recipients = 72 participants). Delayed Intervention Control group=27 dyads(27 caregivers + 27 care recipients = 54 participants).
75.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8 • n=63 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Immediate Intervention group=36 dyads (36 caregivers + 36 care recipients = 72 participants). Delayed Intervention Control group=27 dyads(27 caregivers + 27 care recipients = 54 participants).
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female Caregivers
34 Participants
n=34 Participants • There were 58 caregivers who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer, 4 screen failed or withdrew before reporting age). There were 62 Veteran care recipients who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer).
22 Participants
n=24 Participants • There were 58 caregivers who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer, 4 screen failed or withdrew before reporting age). There were 62 Veteran care recipients who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer).
56 Participants
n=58 Participants • There were 58 caregivers who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer, 4 screen failed or withdrew before reporting age). There were 62 Veteran care recipients who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer).
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male Veterans
34 Participants
n=35 Participants • There were 58 caregivers who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer, 4 screen failed or withdrew before reporting age). There were 62 Veteran care recipients who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer).
27 Participants
n=27 Participants • There were 58 caregivers who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer, 4 screen failed or withdrew before reporting age). There were 62 Veteran care recipients who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer).
61 Participants
n=62 Participants • There were 58 caregivers who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer, 4 screen failed or withdrew before reporting age). There were 62 Veteran care recipients who responded (Of original 63, 1 refused to answer).
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver · American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver · Asian
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
1 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
2 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver · Black or African American
20 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
13 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
33 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver · White
13 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
10 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
23 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver · More than one race
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver · Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
1 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
1 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Health Status
Caregivers · Poor
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
1 Participants
n=23 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
1 Participants
n=57 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care Recipient · American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=21 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=53 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care Recipient · Asian
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=21 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=53 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care Recipient · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=21 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=53 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care Recipient · Black or African American
19 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
10 Participants
n=21 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
29 Participants
n=53 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care Recipient · White
13 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
11 Participants
n=21 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
24 Participants
n=53 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care Recipient · More than one race
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=21 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=53 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care Recipient · Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=21 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
0 Participants
n=53 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group Two caregivers withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Four care recipients withdrew before completing the baseline survey. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening. Two care recipients failed screening and four withdrew before completing the baseline survey.
Region of Enrollment
United States
72 Participants
n=72 Participants
54 Participants
n=54 Participants
126 Participants
n=126 Participants
Number of CG Health Problems
2.47 Health problems
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.88 • n=34 Participants • There were 35 caregivers assigned to the Immediate Intervention Group, but one withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. There were 28 caregivers assigned to the Delayed Intervention Control Group, but two failed the screening after consenting and one withdrew before completing the baseline surveys.
2.24 Health problems
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.63 • n=25 Participants • There were 35 caregivers assigned to the Immediate Intervention Group, but one withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. There were 28 caregivers assigned to the Delayed Intervention Control Group, but two failed the screening after consenting and one withdrew before completing the baseline surveys.
2.37 Health problems
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78 • n=59 Participants • There were 35 caregivers assigned to the Immediate Intervention Group, but one withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. There were 28 caregivers assigned to the Delayed Intervention Control Group, but two failed the screening after consenting and one withdrew before completing the baseline surveys.
Care Recipient Total Diagnoses
18.94 Health Problems
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86 • n=36 Participants • Only the number of care recipients' health problems were summed from medical records. Caregiver health was self-reported
23.33 Health Problems
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.17 • n=27 Participants • Only the number of care recipients' health problems were summed from medical records. Caregiver health was self-reported
20.83 Health Problems
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.12 • n=63 Participants • Only the number of care recipients' health problems were summed from medical records. Caregiver health was self-reported
Marital Status
32 Participants
n=34 Participants • There were 36 caregivers assigned to the Immediate Intervention Group, but two withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. There were 27 caregivers assigned to the Delayed Intervention Control Group, but two failed the screening after consenting.
21 Participants
n=25 Participants • There were 36 caregivers assigned to the Immediate Intervention Group, but two withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. There were 27 caregivers assigned to the Delayed Intervention Control Group, but two failed the screening after consenting.
53 Participants
n=59 Participants • There were 36 caregivers assigned to the Immediate Intervention Group, but two withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. There were 27 caregivers assigned to the Delayed Intervention Control Group, but two failed the screening after consenting.
Education
Caregivers
22 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and four withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
18 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and four withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
40 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and four withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
Education
Care Recipients
21 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and four withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
17 Participants
n=22 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and four withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
38 Participants
n=54 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and four withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
Employment
Caregivers · Retired
20 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
14 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
34 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
Employment
Caregivers · Not Employed
11 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
8 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
19 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
Employment
Caregivers · Employed
3 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
3 Participants
n=25 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
6 Participants
n=59 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
Employment
Care Recipients · Retired
12 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
3 Participants
n=22 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
15 Participants
n=54 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
Employment
Care Recipients · Not Employed
6 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
7 Participants
n=22 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
13 Participants
n=54 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
Employment
Care Recipients · Employed
14 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
12 Participants
n=22 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
26 Participants
n=54 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew. One care recipient refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed the screening and one withdrew. Two care recipients failed the screening and three withdrew.
Income
11 Participants
n=28 Participants • There were 35 caregivers assigned to the Immediate Intervention Group, but one withdrew, four were unsure, and two refused to answer. There were 28 caregivers assigned to the Delayed Intervention Control Group, but two failed the screening after consenting, one withdrew, one was unsure, and two refused to answer.
10 Participants
n=22 Participants • There were 35 caregivers assigned to the Immediate Intervention Group, but one withdrew, four were unsure, and two refused to answer. There were 28 caregivers assigned to the Delayed Intervention Control Group, but two failed the screening after consenting, one withdrew, one was unsure, and two refused to answer.
21 Participants
n=50 Participants • There were 35 caregivers assigned to the Immediate Intervention Group, but one withdrew, four were unsure, and two refused to answer. There were 28 caregivers assigned to the Delayed Intervention Control Group, but two failed the screening after consenting, one withdrew, one was unsure, and two refused to answer.
Health Status
Caregivers · Excellent
2 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
4 Participants
n=23 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
6 Participants
n=57 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
Health Status
Caregivers · Very Good
9 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
10 Participants
n=23 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
19 Participants
n=57 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
Health Status
Caregivers · Good
21 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
6 Participants
n=23 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
27 Participants
n=57 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
Health Status
Caregivers · Fair
2 Participants
n=34 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
2 Participants
n=23 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
4 Participants
n=57 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
Health Status
Care Recipients · Excellent
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
0 Participants
n=8 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
Health Status
Care Recipients · Very Good
1 Participants
n=16 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
1 Participants
n=8 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
2 Participants
n=24 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
Health Status
Care Recipients · Good
10 Participants
n=16 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
0 Participants
n=8 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
10 Participants
n=24 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
Health Status
Care Recipients · Fair
4 Participants
n=16 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
5 Participants
n=8 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
9 Participants
n=24 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
Health Status
Care Recipients · Poor
1 Participants
n=16 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
2 Participants
n=8 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
3 Participants
n=24 Participants • Immediate Intervention Group One caregiver withdrew before completing the baseline surveys. Three care recipients withdrew. 17 care recipients did not respond (proxy). Delayed Intervention Control Group Two caregivers failed screening and three withdrew. Four care recipients withdrew, two failed screening, and 15 did not respond (proxy).
Caregiver Relationship to Veteran
Spouse
29 Participants
n=34 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
20 Participants
n=25 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
49 Participants
n=59 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
Caregiver Relationship to Veteran
Daughter
3 Participants
n=34 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
3 Participants
n=25 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
6 Participants
n=59 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
Caregiver Relationship to Veteran
Sister
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
1 Participants
n=25 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
2 Participants
n=59 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
Caregiver Relationship to Veteran
Neice
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
1 Participants
n=25 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
1 Participants
n=59 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
Caregiver Relationship to Veteran
Mother
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
0 Participants
n=25 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
1 Participants
n=59 Participants • Responses are only from caregivers. Two caregivers from the Immediate Intervention Control Group withdrew before completing baseline assessments. Two caregivers from the Delayed Intervention Control Group failed screening.
Military Branch
Army
16 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
13 Participants
n=23 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
29 Participants
n=55 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
Military Branch
Navy
5 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
2 Participants
n=23 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
7 Participants
n=55 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
Military Branch
Air Force
8 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
5 Participants
n=23 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
13 Participants
n=55 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
Military Branch
Marines
3 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
2 Participants
n=23 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
5 Participants
n=55 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
Military Branch
Coast Guard
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
1 Participants
n=23 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.
1 Participants
n=55 Participants • Immediate Intervention Control Group One Veteran refused to answer and three withdrew. Delayed Intervention Control Group Two Veterans failed screening and two withdrew.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: T1 Baseline and T2 Post Intervention; 4-6 Weeks

Population: Caregivers who reported their Veteran care recipient performed transfer tasks with assistance from informal caregiver. Two caregivers from the Intervention group and four caregivers from the Control group did not complete T2 and their data was not analyzed.

Caregiver reported the level of confidence that Veteran care recipient can perform 10 activity of daily living tasks rated on scale of 1-10. Efficacy in task completion reported both with assistance from the informal caregiver and performed independently by the Veteran. Scores range from 10-100 with higher scores reflecting greater transfer efficacy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Delayed Intervention Control Group
n=23 Participants
Control group. Receives the in-home training intervention six weeks after completing the initial baseline assessment. This allows for a control comparison group while still providing the intervention to all participants. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (prn): Assistive Technology Specialists (ATSs), experts on assistive technology devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform four activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, ATSs also recommend assistive technology equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, ATSs provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Immediate Intervention Group
n=34 Participants
Receives the in-home training intervention immediately after completing the baseline assessment. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (prn): Assistive Technology Specialists (ATSs), experts on assistive technology devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform four activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, ATSs also recommend assistive technology equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, ATSs provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Caregiver Transfer Efficacy
Task Efficacy with Assistance from Caregiver T1
79.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.46
76.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.06
Caregiver Transfer Efficacy
Task Efficacy With Assistance from Caregiver T2
67.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.71
64.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.53
Caregiver Transfer Efficacy
Task Efficacy Independently T1
41.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.14
45.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.78
Caregiver Transfer Efficacy
Task Efficacy Independently T2
32.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.03
44.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.25

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: T1 baseline and T2 Post Intervention; 4-6 weeks

Population: Veteran care recipient reported efficacy in performing transfer tasks with assistance from informal caregiver and independently. One Veteran from the Intervention group did not complete T2 and their data were not analyzed.

Veteran care recipient reported confidence in the performance of 10 activity of daily living tasks rated on scale of 1-10. Items are assessed for efficacy with and without (independently) assistance provided from a caregiver. Scores range from 10-100 with higher scores reflecting greater task efficacy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Delayed Intervention Control Group
n=27 Participants
Control group. Receives the in-home training intervention six weeks after completing the initial baseline assessment. This allows for a control comparison group while still providing the intervention to all participants. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (prn): Assistive Technology Specialists (ATSs), experts on assistive technology devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform four activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, ATSs also recommend assistive technology equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, ATSs provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Immediate Intervention Group
n=35 Participants
Receives the in-home training intervention immediately after completing the baseline assessment. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (prn): Assistive Technology Specialists (ATSs), experts on assistive technology devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform four activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, ATSs also recommend assistive technology equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, ATSs provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Veteran Task Efficacy
Task Efficacy With Assistance from Caregiver T1
79.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.31
85.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.06
Veteran Task Efficacy
Task Efficacy With Assistance from Caregiver T2
83.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.65
85.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.85
Veteran Task Efficacy
Task Efficacy Independent T1
58.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.17
62.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.65
Veteran Task Efficacy
Task Efficacy Independent T2
70.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.89
74.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.85

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: T1 Baseline and T2 Post Intervention; 4-6 Weeks

Population: Composite caregiver burden reported by informal caregiver. Ten caregivers from the Intervention group and seven caregivers from the Control group did not complete T2 and their data was not analyzed.

Zarit Burden Interview Revised -indicating caregiver burden. Caregivers endorse 22 items using a 5-point scale. Response options range from 0 (Never) to 4 (Nearly Always). Higher scores reflect greater caregiver burden. Scores range from 0 to 88.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Delayed Intervention Control Group
n=20 Participants
Control group. Receives the in-home training intervention six weeks after completing the initial baseline assessment. This allows for a control comparison group while still providing the intervention to all participants. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (prn): Assistive Technology Specialists (ATSs), experts on assistive technology devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform four activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, ATSs also recommend assistive technology equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, ATSs provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Immediate Intervention Group
n=26 Participants
Receives the in-home training intervention immediately after completing the baseline assessment. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (prn): Assistive Technology Specialists (ATSs), experts on assistive technology devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform four activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, ATSs also recommend assistive technology equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, ATSs provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Caregiver Burden
Caregiver Burden T1
29.14 units on Zarit Burden scale
Standard Deviation 12.28
28.06 units on Zarit Burden scale
Standard Deviation 14.31
Caregiver Burden
Caregiver Burden T2
27.14 units on Zarit Burden scale
Standard Deviation 11.65
26.00 units on Zarit Burden scale
Standard Deviation 12.45

Adverse Events

Immediate Intervention Group - In-person

Serious events: 7 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 3 deaths

Delayed Intervention Control Group - In-person

Serious events: 9 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Immediate Intervention Group - Tele Arm

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Delayed Intervention Control Group - Tele Arm

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Immediate Intervention Group - In-person
n=38 participants at risk
Receives the in-home training intervention in-person immediately after completing the baseline assessment. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (AT) (prn): AT Specialists, experts on AT devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform three activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, AT Specialists also recommend AT equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, AT Specialists provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Delayed Intervention Control Group - In-person
n=30 participants at risk
Receives the in-home training intervention in-person six weeks after completing the initial baseline assessment. This allows for a control comparison group while still providing the intervention to all participants. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (AT) (prn): AT Specialists, experts on AT devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform three activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, AT Specialists also recommend AT equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, AT Specialists provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Immediate Intervention Group - Tele Arm
n=34 participants at risk
Receives the in-home training intervention remotely via a tele-video conference immediately after completing the baseline assessment. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (AT) (prn): AT Specialists, experts on AT devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform three activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, AT Specialists also recommend AT equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, AT Specialists provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
Delayed Intervention Control Group - Tele Arm
n=24 participants at risk
Receives the in-home training intervention remotely via a tele-video conference six weeks after completing the initial baseline assessment. This allows for a control comparison group while still providing the intervention to all participants. In-home Training and Provision of Assistive Technology (AT) (prn): AT Specialists, experts on AT devices and how to performing transfer tasks, train Veteran and caregiver dyads to safely, skillfully, and (when appropriate) independently perform three activities of daily living (ADLs): transferring in and out of bed, toileting, and bathing. During the baseline assessments, AT Specialists also recommend AT equipment (grab bars, bed rails, raised toilet seats, etc.), environmental modifications, adaptive methods, and energy conservation techniques. On the first day of the intervention, AT Specialists provide and install recommended equipment and train the dyad to complete the three ADLs using the recommended the modified methods.
General disorders
Hospitalization
13.2%
5/38 • Number of events 6 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
23.3%
7/30 • Number of events 7 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 3 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
0.00%
0/24 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
General disorders
Potential for Injury
2.6%
1/38 • Number of events 1 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
0.00%
0/34 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
0.00%
0/24 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
General disorders
Death
7.9%
3/38 • Number of events 3 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
0.00%
0/34 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.
0.00%
0/24 • Information on adverse events was collected for the duration of the study--2.5 years--from December 2013 until the study ended in June 2016.
Because care recipients were required to receive assistance with at least one transfer, the majority of care recipient participants were frail. Each serious event reported to the team was recorded and reviewed. Only two potential injury adverse events were determined to be related to the research study because the events involved equipment provided during the intervention. All deaths and hospitalizations were determined to be anticipated due to the frail population and unrelated to the study.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Patricia C. Griffiths

Atlanta VA Medical Center

Phone: 404-321-6111

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place