Trial Outcomes & Findings for Human Optokinetic Contrast Device (HOCD) to Measure Visual Function and Identify Patients With and Without Glaucoma (NCT NCT02014597)

NCT ID: NCT02014597

Last Updated: 2023-05-11

Results Overview

The HOCD willl be used to estimate the logCS of both eyes in both dark (scotopic) and light (photopic) conditions.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

23 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Study 1: Measured on the day of enrollment - reported only for those enrolled (early Termination). Study 2: Measured on the day of enrollment and 1 month later - not started (early Termination).

Results posted on

2023-05-11

Participant Flow

Normal subjects were recruited by word of mouth (medical clinic staff, employees, friends, relatives); Glaucoma subjects were recruited from a glaucoma specific clinic.

Unit of analysis: Eyes

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Normal
Normal subjects without glaucoma
Glaucoma
Subjects with glaucoma
Overall Study
STARTED
12 24
11 22
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10 20
10 20
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2 4
1 2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Normal
Normal subjects without glaucoma
Glaucoma
Subjects with glaucoma
Overall Study
Unable to record log contrast sensitivity
2
1

Baseline Characteristics

Human Optokinetic Contrast Device (HOCD) to Measure Visual Function and Identify Patients With and Without Glaucoma

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Normal
n=12 Participants
Normal subjects without glaucoma
Glaucoma
n=11 Participants
Subjects with glaucoma
Total
n=23 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Best Corrected Vision = 20/40 or better
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Study 1: Measured on the day of enrollment - reported only for those enrolled (early Termination). Study 2: Measured on the day of enrollment and 1 month later - not started (early Termination).

Population: Scotopic and photopic logCS for both eyes (right and left)

The HOCD willl be used to estimate the logCS of both eyes in both dark (scotopic) and light (photopic) conditions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Normal
n=20 Eyes
Normal subjects without glaucoma
Glaucoma
n=20 Eyes
Subjects with glaucoma
Estimated Contrast Sensitivity in Log Units (logCS)
Scotopic - right eyes
1.26 logCS
Interval 1.19 to 1.58
1.50 logCS
Interval 1.43 to 1.6
Estimated Contrast Sensitivity in Log Units (logCS)
Scotopic - left eyes
1.45 logCS
Interval 1.32 to 1.64
1.70 logCS
Interval 1.35 to 1.91
Estimated Contrast Sensitivity in Log Units (logCS)
Photopic - right eyes
0.264 logCS
Interval -0.428 to 1.57
-0.188 logCS
Interval -0.44 to 0.0417
Estimated Contrast Sensitivity in Log Units (logCS)
Photopic - left eyes
1.06 logCS
Interval -0.0663 to 1.62
-0.0933 logCS
Interval -0.502 to 0.857

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Study 1: Measured on the day of enrollment - reported only for those enrolled (early Termination). Study 2: Measured on the day of enrollment and 1 month later - not started (early Termination).

Population: Scotopic and photopic logCS (right and left eyes pooled together)

Measure differences in logCS between subjects with and without glaucoma.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Normal
n=20 Eyes
Normal subjects without glaucoma
Glaucoma
n=20 Eyes
Subjects with glaucoma
Compare Log Contrast Sensitivity in Subjects With and Without Glaucoma
Scotopic - all eyes
1.42 logCS
Interval 1.22 to 1.58
1.52 logCS
Interval 1.36 to 1.81
Compare Log Contrast Sensitivity in Subjects With and Without Glaucoma
Photopic - all eyes
0.65 logCS
Interval -0.322 to 1.59
-0.188 logCS
Interval -0.462 to 0.536

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Study 1: Measured on the day of enrollment - reported only for those enrolled (early Termination). Study 2: Measured on the day of enrollment - not started (early Termination).

Population: Only subjects with glaucoma had automated perimetry for comparison in Study 1. Eyes were pooled for analysis.

Measure contrast sensitivity with the HOCD (logCS) and then compare to automated perimetry results (Decibels). For subjects with glaucoma this will be performed as part of both Study 1 and Study 2. For normal control subjects, this will only be performed as part of Study 2.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Normal
Normal subjects without glaucoma
Glaucoma
n=20 Eyes
Subjects with glaucoma
Compare Log Contrast Sensitivity Measured With the HOCD to White on White Sensitivity Via Automated Perimetry
MD
-2.82 Decibels
Standard Deviation 3.27
Compare Log Contrast Sensitivity Measured With the HOCD to White on White Sensitivity Via Automated Perimetry
PSD
4.34 Decibels
Standard Deviation 3.41

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Study 2: Measured 1 month after the day of enrollment - not started (early Termination).

Population: Study 2 never performed due to early Termination

Compare contrast sensitivity measured with the HOCD (logCS) to contrast sensitivity testing via Pelli Robson Contrast Sensitivity Chart testing. Study 2 only.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Study 1: Measured on the day of enrollment - reported only for those enrolled (early Termination). Study 2: Measured 1 month after the day of enrollment - not started (early Termination).

Population: Only the subjects for whom testing was completed are described.

Subjects will be asked to relate their experiences with the test to determine how well it is tolerated. Subjects will be asked to report their agreement with five statements. This is reported on a custom scale: 1 = Do Not Agree; 2 = Partially Agree; 3 = Mostly Agree; 4 = Fully Agree. Higher scores represent more complete agreement with the statement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Normal
n=10 Participants
Normal subjects without glaucoma
Glaucoma
n=10 Participants
Subjects with glaucoma
Tolerance of Testing as Measured Via Questionnaire
I understood the test instructions.
3.9 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
4 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0
Tolerance of Testing as Measured Via Questionnaire
I was physically comfortable during the test.
3.7 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
3.6 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
Tolerance of Testing as Measured Via Questionnaire
The length of the test was appropriate.
2.8 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
3.6 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
Tolerance of Testing as Measured Via Questionnaire
I had problems with the time spent in the dark.
1.3 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
1 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 1.0
Tolerance of Testing as Measured Via Questionnaire
I would recommend this test if likely to diagnose glaucoma sooner.
4 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
4 score on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 4.0

Adverse Events

Normal

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Glaucoma

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Benjamin Frankfort

Baylor College of Medicine

Phone: 713-798-3453

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place