Trial Outcomes & Findings for Conversion From Brand to Generic Tacrolimus in High Risk Transplant Recipients (NCT NCT02014103)

NCT ID: NCT02014103

Last Updated: 2024-10-15

Results Overview

Report the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for AUC 0-12hr (ng\*hr/ml) for each formulation in expressor and non expressor transplant recipients

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

71 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Whole blood samples were collected immediately prior to dosing, at 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours following dosing. Subjects were then instructed to performed fingersticks using dried blood spot cards at 8 and 12 hours post dose.

Results posted on

2024-10-15

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Expressors
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
Non-expressors
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
Overall Study
STARTED
35
36
Overall Study
Did Receive Allocated Intervention
34
36
Overall Study
Discontinued Intervention
6
5
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Accord
34
34
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Astellas
32
33
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Dr. Reddy
34
33
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Mylan
32
34
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Panacea
33
33
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Sandoz
34
32
Overall Study
Excluded From Analysis
2
4
Overall Study
COMPLETED
26
27
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
9
9

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Expressors
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
Non-expressors
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
7
7
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
0
Overall Study
Lost venous access
1
0
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
0
2

Baseline Characteristics

Conversion From Brand to Generic Tacrolimus in High Risk Transplant Recipients

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Expressors
n=26 Participants
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
Non-expressors
n=27 Participants
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
Total
n=53 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
55.5 years
n=5 Participants
57 years
n=7 Participants
56.25 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants
n=5 Participants
27 participants
n=7 Participants
53 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Whole blood samples were collected immediately prior to dosing, at 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours following dosing. Subjects were then instructed to performed fingersticks using dried blood spot cards at 8 and 12 hours post dose.

Report the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for AUC 0-12hr (ng\*hr/ml) for each formulation in expressor and non expressor transplant recipients

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Expressors
n=26 Participants
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
Non-expressors
n=27 Participants
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
Dr. Reddys
Subjects receiving the Dr Reddy formulation
Mylan
Subjects receiving the Mylan formulation
Panacea
Subjects receiving the Panacea formulation
Sandoz
Subjects receiving the Sandoz formulation
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Accord
112.35 ng*hr/ml
Interval 95.83 to 131.72
92.37 ng*hr/ml
Interval 81.14 to 105.15
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Astellas
97.04 ng*hr/ml
Interval 82.77 to 113.77
84.16 ng*hr/ml
Interval 73.93 to 95.81
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Dr. Reddys
110.63 ng*hr/ml
Interval 85.83 to 117.98
83.96 ng*hr/ml
Interval 73.75 to 95.58
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Mylan
96.83 ng*hr/ml
Interval 82.59 to 113.53
85.53 ng*hr/ml
Interval 75.13 to 97.37
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Panacea
100.58 ng*hr/ml
Interval 85.79 to 117.92
89.38 ng*hr/ml
Interval 78.51 to 101.75
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Sandoz
98.68 ng*hr/ml
Interval 84.17 to 115.7
87.60 ng*hr/ml
Interval 76.95 to 99.73

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Whole blood samples were collected immediately prior to dosing, at 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours following dosing. Subjects were then instructed to performed fingersticks using dried blood spot cards at 8 and 12 hours post dose.

Report the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for Cmax (ng/ml) for each formulation in expressor and non expressor transplant recipients

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Expressors
n=26 Participants
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
Non-expressors
n=27 Participants
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
Dr. Reddys
Subjects receiving the Dr Reddy formulation
Mylan
Subjects receiving the Mylan formulation
Panacea
Subjects receiving the Panacea formulation
Sandoz
Subjects receiving the Sandoz formulation
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Accord
21.72 ng/ml
Interval 17.43 to 27.07
15.07 ng/ml
Interval 13.02 to 17.44
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Astellas
15.31 ng/ml
Interval 12.29 to 19.07
13.34 ng/ml
Interval 11.53 to 15.44
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Dr. Reddys
15.94 ng/ml
Interval 12.79 to 19.86
13.58 ng/ml
Interval 11.73 to 15.71
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Mylan
17.76 ng/ml
Interval 14.26 to 22.13
15.15 ng/ml
Interval 13.09 to 17.53
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Panacea
16.67 ng/ml
Interval 13.38 to 20.78
13.23 ng/ml
Interval 11.43 to 15.31
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Sandoz
14.40 ng/ml
Interval 11.56 to 17.94
12.75 ng/ml
Interval 11.02 to 14.76

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and weekly for 6 weeks at each pharmacokinetic profile

Population: Participants in the PK population with available data

Conduct safety lab testing specific to transplanted organ function and clinical assessments for adverse events.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Expressors
n=53 Participants
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
Non-expressors
n=53 Participants
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
Dr. Reddys
n=53 Participants
Subjects receiving the Dr Reddy formulation
Mylan
n=53 Participants
Subjects receiving the Mylan formulation
Panacea
n=53 Participants
Subjects receiving the Panacea formulation
Sandoz
n=53 Participants
Subjects receiving the Sandoz formulation
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
All cause mortality
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Serious Adverse Events
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Total Other Adverse Events (not including Serious)
22 Participants
14 Participants
20 Participants
22 Participants
23 Participants
13 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Nervous system
2 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Blood and Lymphatic system
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Cardiac
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Ear and labyrinth
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Metabolism and Nutrition
2 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
2 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Gastrointestinal
4 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Reproductive system and breast disorders
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Infections and infestations
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Skin and subcutaneous tissue
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Psychiatric
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Vascular
0 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Investigations
4 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Renal and urinary
1 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Allergies
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Eye Disorder
2 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Endocrine
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
General disorders and administrative site conditions
4 Participants
3 Participants
3 Participants
7 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants

Adverse Events

Accord

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 22 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Astellas

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 14 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Dr. Reddys

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 20 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Mylan

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 22 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Panacea

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 23 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sandoz

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 13 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Accord
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Accord formulation
Astellas
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Astellas formulation
Dr. Reddys
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Dr Reddy formulation
Mylan
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Mylan formulation
Panacea
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Panacea formulation
Sandoz
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Sandoz formulation
Nervous system disorders
Anxiety, tremor
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 7 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
leukopenia, thrombocytopenia
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Cardiac disorders
hypertension, tachycardia
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Ear and labyrinth disorders
ear erythemia
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
dehydration, hyperkalemia
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Gastrointestinal disorders
nausea, vomitting, diarhea
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
nasal congestion
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
muscle aches
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Infections and infestations
respiratory tract infections
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
rash
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Psychiatric disorders
depression
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Vascular disorders
lost venous access
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Investigations
study related issues
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Renal and urinary disorders
difficult urinating
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
9.4%
5/53 • Number of events 5 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
General disorders
allergies
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Eye disorders
eye redness, itching
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
Endocrine disorders
hyperglycemia
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
General disorders
administrative issues
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 7 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 3 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
13.2%
7/53 • Number of events 7 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 3 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study

Additional Information

Rita Alloway

University of Cincinnati

Phone: 513.558.1568

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place