Trial Outcomes & Findings for Conversion From Brand to Generic Tacrolimus in High Risk Transplant Recipients (NCT NCT02014103)
NCT ID: NCT02014103
Last Updated: 2024-10-15
Results Overview
Report the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for AUC 0-12hr (ng\*hr/ml) for each formulation in expressor and non expressor transplant recipients
COMPLETED
PHASE4
71 participants
Whole blood samples were collected immediately prior to dosing, at 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours following dosing. Subjects were then instructed to performed fingersticks using dried blood spot cards at 8 and 12 hours post dose.
2024-10-15
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Expressors
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
|
Non-expressors
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
35
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
Did Receive Allocated Intervention
|
34
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
Discontinued Intervention
|
6
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Accord
|
34
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Astellas
|
32
|
33
|
|
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Dr. Reddy
|
34
|
33
|
|
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Mylan
|
32
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Panacea
|
33
|
33
|
|
Overall Study
Number Subjects Receiving Sandoz
|
34
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
Excluded From Analysis
|
2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
26
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Expressors
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
|
Non-expressors
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
7
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost venous access
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Conversion From Brand to Generic Tacrolimus in High Risk Transplant Recipients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Expressors
n=26 Participants
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
|
Non-expressors
n=27 Participants
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
|
Total
n=53 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.5 years
n=5 Participants
|
57 years
n=7 Participants
|
56.25 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Whole blood samples were collected immediately prior to dosing, at 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours following dosing. Subjects were then instructed to performed fingersticks using dried blood spot cards at 8 and 12 hours post dose.Report the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for AUC 0-12hr (ng\*hr/ml) for each formulation in expressor and non expressor transplant recipients
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Expressors
n=26 Participants
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
|
Non-expressors
n=27 Participants
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
|
Dr. Reddys
Subjects receiving the Dr Reddy formulation
|
Mylan
Subjects receiving the Mylan formulation
|
Panacea
Subjects receiving the Panacea formulation
|
Sandoz
Subjects receiving the Sandoz formulation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Accord
|
112.35 ng*hr/ml
Interval 95.83 to 131.72
|
92.37 ng*hr/ml
Interval 81.14 to 105.15
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Astellas
|
97.04 ng*hr/ml
Interval 82.77 to 113.77
|
84.16 ng*hr/ml
Interval 73.93 to 95.81
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Dr. Reddys
|
110.63 ng*hr/ml
Interval 85.83 to 117.98
|
83.96 ng*hr/ml
Interval 73.75 to 95.58
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Mylan
|
96.83 ng*hr/ml
Interval 82.59 to 113.53
|
85.53 ng*hr/ml
Interval 75.13 to 97.37
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Panacea
|
100.58 ng*hr/ml
Interval 85.79 to 117.92
|
89.38 ng*hr/ml
Interval 78.51 to 101.75
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Compare AUC 0-12hr of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Sandoz
|
98.68 ng*hr/ml
Interval 84.17 to 115.7
|
87.60 ng*hr/ml
Interval 76.95 to 99.73
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Whole blood samples were collected immediately prior to dosing, at 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours following dosing. Subjects were then instructed to performed fingersticks using dried blood spot cards at 8 and 12 hours post dose.Report the geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for Cmax (ng/ml) for each formulation in expressor and non expressor transplant recipients
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Expressors
n=26 Participants
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
|
Non-expressors
n=27 Participants
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
|
Dr. Reddys
Subjects receiving the Dr Reddy formulation
|
Mylan
Subjects receiving the Mylan formulation
|
Panacea
Subjects receiving the Panacea formulation
|
Sandoz
Subjects receiving the Sandoz formulation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Accord
|
21.72 ng/ml
Interval 17.43 to 27.07
|
15.07 ng/ml
Interval 13.02 to 17.44
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Astellas
|
15.31 ng/ml
Interval 12.29 to 19.07
|
13.34 ng/ml
Interval 11.53 to 15.44
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Dr. Reddys
|
15.94 ng/ml
Interval 12.79 to 19.86
|
13.58 ng/ml
Interval 11.73 to 15.71
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Mylan
|
17.76 ng/ml
Interval 14.26 to 22.13
|
15.15 ng/ml
Interval 13.09 to 17.53
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Panacea
|
16.67 ng/ml
Interval 13.38 to 20.78
|
13.23 ng/ml
Interval 11.43 to 15.31
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Compare Cmax of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Expressor and Non Expressor Transplant Recipients
Sandoz
|
14.40 ng/ml
Interval 11.56 to 17.94
|
12.75 ng/ml
Interval 11.02 to 14.76
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and weekly for 6 weeks at each pharmacokinetic profilePopulation: Participants in the PK population with available data
Conduct safety lab testing specific to transplanted organ function and clinical assessments for adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Expressors
n=53 Participants
Subjects with at least one \*1 allele of CYP3A5
|
Non-expressors
n=53 Participants
Subjects homozygous for the \*3 CYP3A5 allele
|
Dr. Reddys
n=53 Participants
Subjects receiving the Dr Reddy formulation
|
Mylan
n=53 Participants
Subjects receiving the Mylan formulation
|
Panacea
n=53 Participants
Subjects receiving the Panacea formulation
|
Sandoz
n=53 Participants
Subjects receiving the Sandoz formulation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
All cause mortality
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Serious Adverse Events
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Total Other Adverse Events (not including Serious)
|
22 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Nervous system
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Blood and Lymphatic system
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Cardiac
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Ear and labyrinth
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Metabolism and Nutrition
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Gastrointestinal
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Reproductive system and breast disorders
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Infections and infestations
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Skin and subcutaneous tissue
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Psychiatric
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Vascular
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Investigations
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Renal and urinary
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Allergies
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Eye Disorder
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
Endocrine
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Each Tacrolimus Formulation in Stable Transplant Subjects
General disorders and administrative site conditions
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Accord
Astellas
Dr. Reddys
Mylan
Panacea
Sandoz
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Accord
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Accord formulation
|
Astellas
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Astellas formulation
|
Dr. Reddys
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Dr Reddy formulation
|
Mylan
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Mylan formulation
|
Panacea
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Panacea formulation
|
Sandoz
n=53 participants at risk
Subjects receiving the Sandoz formulation
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Anxiety, tremor
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 7 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
leukopenia, thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Cardiac disorders
hypertension, tachycardia
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
ear erythemia
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
dehydration, hyperkalemia
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
nausea, vomitting, diarhea
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
muscle aches
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Infections and infestations
respiratory tract infections
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
rash
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
depression
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Vascular disorders
lost venous access
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Investigations
study related issues
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
difficult urinating
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
9.4%
5/53 • Number of events 5 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
General disorders
allergies
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Eye disorders
eye redness, itching
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
Endocrine disorders
hyperglycemia
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
0.00%
0/53 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
|
General disorders
administrative issues
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 7 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 3 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
13.2%
7/53 • Number of events 7 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 3 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 4 • Data was collected during the 6 week period enrolled in the pharmacokinetic study
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place