Clinical Trial to Evaluate R-COMP Versus R-CHOP in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Non-localised Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)/Follicular Lymphoma Grade IIIb

NCT ID: NCT02012088

Last Updated: 2024-02-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

91 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-11

Study Completion Date

2021-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Phase II study proposed here assesses the hypothesis that replacing doxorubicin by Myocet® in the R-CHOP regimen would yield comparable antitumour efficacy with a lower cardiotoxicity for first-line treatment in elderly patients with non-localised DLBCL/Follicular lymphoma grade IIIb

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common histological subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). This is an aggressive lymphoma, with an incidence in Western countries estimated at 5-6 cases/100,000 inhabitants/year that increases with age.

Treatment for patients with DLBCL is currently based on immunochemotherapy, of which the R-CHOP regimen, which includes cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) in combination with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and is administered every 21 days for a total of 6-8 cycles, is the most commonly used.

Cardiotoxicity is one of the undesirable effects that limit the use of anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, as part of the CHOP regimen, which is caused by the formation of complexes between ferric ions and the anthracycline within the myocyte. Because of their oxidative properties, these complexes are toxic and produce highly reactive free radicals that damage the lipid membrane and lead to the cell death of myocytes. Several studies have linked the onset of cardiotoxicity with old age, high cumulative doses of doxorubicin, cardiovascular risk factors and previous heart disease, among others. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity is cumulative and irreversible. Moreover, left ventricular dysfunction is an important late effect in patients with aggressive NHL who survive long term and, according to some studies, have received doxorubicin at doses higher than 200 mg/m². Cardiotoxicity may be silent or subclinical, which is usually detected as a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), or clinical, with varying degrees of congestive heart failure (CHF). Depending on the symptoms, cardiotoxicity also differs between acute, subacute, late or chronic. The first is manifested at an early stage, usually as arrhythmia, transient ECG changes or pericarditis, among others, is usually reversible, is not detrimental to the continuation of treatment and is not associated with subacute and late toxicity.

Chronic cardiotoxicity could be early or late. Early-onset cardiotoxicity occurs within 1 year after anthracycline treatment and late-onset cardiotoxicity occurs more than 1 year after completion of anthracycline treatment. In the latter two, cardiotoxicity is associated with the lesion of cardiomyocytes and is therefore considered irreversible. The incidence of cardiotoxicity varies among different studies, depending on patient follow-up or the definition of cardiotoxicity used (acute, subacute or late).

In addition to clinical findings, the determination of LVEF or, more recently, the use of biomarkers, are the most commonly used methods to diagnose and assess cardiotoxicity. Regarding the identification of biomarkers, troponin I and N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are the most commonly used and investigated in the context of clinical studies. The advantages of using biomarkers include their minimally invasive identification, which is less expensive than echocardiography, and, unlike radionuclide ventriculography, they avoid irradiation of the patient. Furthermore, the interpretation of their results does not depend on the observer's experience, thus avoiding interobserver variability. Several studies have shown the role of troponins as indicators of early anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity or other chemotherapeutic agents, which are able to predict impaired ventricular function and higher incidence of cardiac events in patients with elevated values of this marker compared with patients with normal troponin values. Regarding the use of brain natriuretic peptides such as NT-proBNP, several studies have shown a correlation between persistently high values of this biomarker and impaired heart function parameters, in particular LVEF.

Myocet® (non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) is one of the several strategies developed to reduce cardiotoxicity and maintain the therapeutic efficacy of the R-CHOP regimen. Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has shown a similar efficacy and less cardiotoxicity than conventional doxorubicin in the treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer. In addition, several studies in patients with NHL have shown similar response rates with regimens containing non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin to those obtained in historical controls with conventional doxorubicin, with a low incidence of clinical and subclinical cardiovascular events. The treatment is relatively well tolerated, while myelosuppression is its most important toxicity.

Most of these phase I and II studies (with or without rituximab), which assessed Myocet® in combination with cyclophosphamide; vincristine and prednisone, showed that it is an active treatment in newly diagnosed patients with aggressive NHL.

100% of the data registered on CRFs will be source data verified. eCRDs will be used in order to register the data. Nine monitoring visits per site will be performed.

First monitoring vistit will be performed when the first patient is included Second monitoring visit willb be performed when the third patient is included Third monitoring visit will be perforemd when the fifth patient is included Fourth monitoring visit will be performed then the last patient finish study treatment One monitoring visit per year will be performed during follow-up phase.

CRO (Dynamic) Standard Operating Procedures will be used to manage the clinical trial.

Sample size of the study is based on the hypothesis of a LEVF decrease \<55% in the 15% of patients assigned to R-CHOP treatment group and 5% of patients assigned to R-COMP treatment group.

Categorical variables were show by absolute and relative frequencies, including the confidence interval of 95%.

For the description of the continuous variables will be use the mean, standard deviation, median, mode, minimum and maximum, including the total number of valid values.

In the case of compare subgroups of patients, will be use for quantitative variables parametric tests or nonparametric as characteristics of the variables under study. For qualitative variables will be use Chi-square test.

Statistical analysis was planned with the SAS statistical package version 9.1 or later.

Two interim analysis will be performed when the last patient peforms the end of treatment visit and when the last patient performd the 24 months follow-up visit.

Final analysis will be performed at the end of the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RCOMP

R-COMP Regimen:

Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Myocet® 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RCOMP

Intervention Type DRUG

Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Myocet® 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles

RCHOP

R-CHOP Regimen:

Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RCHOP

Intervention Type DRUG

Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RCOMP

Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Myocet® 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

RCHOP

Day 1: Rituximab 375 mg/m2; Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg); prednisone 60 mg/m2 Days 2-5: Prednisone, 60 mg/m2 Administered every 21 days × 6 cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Rituximab Myocet Cyclophosphamide Vincristine Prednisone Rituximab Doxorubicin Cyclophosphamide Vincristine Prednisone 60 mg/m2

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥60 years of age
* Histological confirmed DLBCL/follicular lymphoma grade IIIb by WHO classification, with any IPI (International Prognostic Index)
* Newly diagnosed, with no previous treatment
* Non-localised stage, i.e. lymphoma that does not fit into a single radiotherapy field (including clinical stage IA with large tumour mass until stage IV) with at least one measurable lesion
* ECOG performance status 0 to 2
* Present appropriate haematologic, liver (ALT or AST \< 2.5 ULN ? upper limit of normal) and renal functions (creatinine \< 2.5 ULN) , unless changes are secondary to lymphoma
* LVEF at rest ? 55%, with no documented history of congestive heart failure (CHF), serious arrhythmia or acute myocardial infarction

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinical stage I without large tumour mass or clinical stage IIA with fewer than three affected areas (stage-IIB patients are considered suitable, regardless of the number of affected areas)
* CNS infiltration
* Transformed lymphoma, although with no previous treatment, as well as other histological subtypes such as mantle cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma and its variants and post-transplant lymphoproliferative syndrome
* Clinically significant secondary cardiovascular disease
* Signs of any severe, acute or chronic and active infection
* Concurrent malignancy or history of other neoplasia except basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cervical or breast carcinoma in situ (CIN)
* Patients with positive results in the HBV, HIV or HCV RNA tests
* Any previous treatment for DLBCL/follicular lymphoma grade IIIb
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Grupo Español de Linfomas y Transplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr. Alejandro Martin

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Salamanca

Dr. Juan Manuel Sancho

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Dr. Francisco Gual

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario de Alava

Vitoria-Gasteiz, Alava, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa

Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Cabueñes

Gijón, Asturas, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

ICO- Hospital Duran i Reynals

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla

Santander, Cantabria, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Salamanca

Salamanca, Castille and León, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid

Valladolid, Castille and León, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Fundación de Alcorcón

Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital del Mar

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, Fisher RI, Hagenbeek A, Zucca E, Rosen ST, Stroobants S, Lister TA, Hoppe RT, Dreyling M, Tobinai K, Vose JM, Connors JM, Federico M, Diehl V; International Harmonization Project on Lymphoma. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):579-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2403. Epub 2007 Jan 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17242396 (View on PubMed)

Rigacci L, Mappa S, Nassi L, Alterini R, Carrai V, Bernardi F, Bosi A. Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab in patients with lymphoma and concurrent cardiac diseases or pre-treated with anthracyclines. Hematol Oncol. 2007 Dec;25(4):198-203. doi: 10.1002/hon.827.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17654614 (View on PubMed)

Luminari S, Montanini A, Caballero D, Bologna S, Notter M, Dyer MJS, Chiappella A, Briones J, Petrini M, Barbato A, Kayitalire L, Federico M. Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (MyocetTM) combination (R-COMP) chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): results from the phase II EUR018 trial. Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1492-1499. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp544. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20007997 (View on PubMed)

Levine AM, Tulpule A, Espina B, Sherrod A, Boswell WD, Lieberman RD, Nathwani BN, Welles L. Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin in combination with standard agents (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) in patients with newly diagnosed AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of therapy and correlates of response. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2662-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.093.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15226333 (View on PubMed)

Cardinale D, Sandri MT, Colombo A, Colombo N, Boeri M, Lamantia G, Civelli M, Peccatori F, Martinelli G, Fiorentini C, Cipolla CM. Prognostic value of troponin I in cardiac risk stratification of cancer patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Circulation. 2004 Jun 8;109(22):2749-54. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000130926.51766.CC. Epub 2004 May 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15148277 (View on PubMed)

Cardinale D, Sandri MT. Role of biomarkers in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Sep-Oct;53(2):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2010.04.002.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20728699 (View on PubMed)

Cardinale D, Salvatici M, Sandri MT. Role of biomarkers in cardioncology. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Sep 6;49(12):1937-48. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.692.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21892906 (View on PubMed)

Sancho JM, Fernandez-Alvarez R, Gual-Capllonch F, Gonzalez-Garcia E, Grande C, Gutierrez N, Penarrubia MJ, Batlle-Lopez A, Gonzalez-Barca E, Guinea JM, Gimeno E, Penalver FJ, Fuertes M, Bastos M, Hernandez-Rivas JA, Moraleda JM, Garcia O, Sorigue M, Martin A. R-COMP versus R-CHOP as first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients >/=60 years: Results of a randomized phase 2 study from the Spanish GELTAMO group. Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(4):1314-1326. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3730. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33492774 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.geltamo.com/

Sponsor web page

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GEL-R-COMP-2013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Split-Dose R-CHOP for Older Adults With DLBCL
NCT03943901 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2