Trial Outcomes & Findings for Imaging Kidney Transplant Rejection Using Ferumoxytol-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance (NCT NCT02006108)
NCT ID: NCT02006108
Last Updated: 2018-05-11
Results Overview
According to the study hypothesis, macrophage infiltration into rejected kidneys will be significantly greater than in healthy kidneys; since macrophages are expected to phagocytose injected iron, there should be a detectable difference in signal intensity between healthy and rejected organs. This can be evaluated using semiquantitative T2\* maps.
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
24 hours to 7 days
2018-05-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Feraheme
Intravenous injection of Feraheme, 5 mg Fe/kg
Interventions:
Drug: Feraheme Procedure: MR Scan
Feraheme: Therapeutic classification: iron preparations. Use: Off-label use of ultrasmall paramagnetic iron nanoparticle as contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging
MRI-GE Healthcare 3 Tesla magnet: All patients will undergo
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
MR Imaging
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
overall study population is 21 patients we had 5 pts with rejection and 16 without. This is why the rows differ from overall
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Feraheme
n=21 Participants
Intravenous injection of Feraheme, 5 mg Fe/kg
Interventions:
Drug: Feraheme Procedure: MR Scan
Feraheme: Therapeutic classification: iron preparations. Use: Off-label use of ultrasmall paramagnetic iron nanoparticle as contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging
MRI-GE Healthcare 3 Tesla magnet: All patients will undergo
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
14 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
7 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
17.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
15 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
21 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients with Kidney Transplant
|
21 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
MRI Compatibility
|
21 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Drug allergies, specifically against iron compounds
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
GFR
Rejection
|
52 ml/min/1.73 m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24 • n=5 Participants • overall study population is 21 patients we had 5 pts with rejection and 16 without. This is why the rows differ from overall
|
|
GFR
Normal
|
90 ml/min/1.73 m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29 • n=16 Participants • overall study population is 21 patients we had 5 pts with rejection and 16 without. This is why the rows differ from overall
|
|
Pregnancy
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants • we checked all female participants for pregnancy and none was pregnant
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours to 7 daysPopulation: T2\* value of transplant kidney
According to the study hypothesis, macrophage infiltration into rejected kidneys will be significantly greater than in healthy kidneys; since macrophages are expected to phagocytose injected iron, there should be a detectable difference in signal intensity between healthy and rejected organs. This can be evaluated using semiquantitative T2\* maps.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Feraheme
n=19 Participants
Intravenous injection of Feraheme, 5 mg Fe/kg
Interventions:
Drug: Feraheme Procedure: MR Scan
Feraheme: Therapeutic classification: iron preparations. Use: Off-label use of ultrasmall paramagnetic iron nanoparticle as contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging
MRI-GE Healthcare 3 Tesla magnet: All patients will undergo
|
|---|---|
|
Radiologically Detectable Differences in Signal Intensity Between Healthy and Rejected Kidneys, Measured Using T2* Maps
Rejection
|
31.1 ms (delayed postcontrast scans)
Standard Deviation 14.4
|
|
Radiologically Detectable Differences in Signal Intensity Between Healthy and Rejected Kidneys, Measured Using T2* Maps
No Rejection
|
23.3 ms (delayed postcontrast scans)
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 weeksPopulation: CD163 positive macrophages
To evaluate our ability to quantify cell-bound iron using the novel QSM sequence, we use histopathological data showing 1) the iron content of renal tissue sampled, and 2) the level of macrophage infiltration of the renal tissue. We will perform iron and macrophage stains in biopsy tissues in order to determine this.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Feraheme
n=19 Participants
Intravenous injection of Feraheme, 5 mg Fe/kg
Interventions:
Drug: Feraheme Procedure: MR Scan
Feraheme: Therapeutic classification: iron preparations. Use: Off-label use of ultrasmall paramagnetic iron nanoparticle as contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging
MRI-GE Healthcare 3 Tesla magnet: All patients will undergo
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation of Cell-bound Iron Quantities on QSM Sequences With Macrophage and Iron Stains on Histopathology
|
0 correlation coefficient
|
Adverse Events
Feraheme
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Heike E. Daldrup-Link
Stanford University, Department of Radiology
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place