Trial Outcomes & Findings for Does Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Alleviate The Pain Experienced During Bone Marrow Sampling? (NCT NCT02005354)
NCT ID: NCT02005354
Last Updated: 2019-10-08
Results Overview
To establish the effect of high-frequency stimulation TENS on the pain experienced by patients undergoing a bone-marrow biopsy, using standard technique with local anaesthetic. The perception of pain will be measured using a pain scale directly after and 24 hours after bone-marrow sampling in patients randomly allocated and blinded to the use of intervention-TENS (IT) or control-TENS (CT) in addition to local anaesthesia.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
Post procedure and 24 hours
2019-10-08
Participant Flow
70 patients were randomised, thirty five patients received TENS impulses at a strong but comfortable amplitude (intervention group) and 35 patients received TENS impulses just above the sensory threshold (control group)
Participant milestones
| Measure |
TENS Intervention
The concealed electrical parameter in this group will be within the therapeutic window, that is, well above the sensory detection threshold but below the pain threshold giving a "strong but comfortable sensation". From previous studies, this is likely to be 50-110Hz.
The device will be activated prior to entry into the treatment room and 2 minutes before administration of local anaesthetic and for 2 minutes after removal of the biopsy needle. This will cover the expected duration of pain as assessed in the pilot study.
All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)
|
TENS Placebo Comparator
Placebo Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at the lowest sensory threshold and an Active Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at a recognised analgesic level (\>50Hz and below the pain threshold for the patient).
Standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide): All patients will receive standard pain
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
35
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
35
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Does Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Alleviate The Pain Experienced During Bone Marrow Sampling?
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
TENS Intervention
n=35 Participants
The concealed electrical parameter in this group will be within the therapeutic window, that is, well above the sensory detection threshold but below the pain threshold giving a "strong but comfortable sensation". From previous studies, this is likely to be 50-110Hz.
The device will be activated prior to entry into the treatment room and 2 minutes before administration of local anaesthetic and for 2 minutes after removal of the biopsy needle. This will cover the expected duration of pain as assessed in the pilot study.
All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)
|
TENS Placebo Comparator
n=35 Participants
Placebo Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at the lowest sensory threshold and an Active Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at a recognised analgesic level (\>50Hz and below the pain threshold for the patient).
Standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide): All patients will receive standard pain
|
Total
n=70 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68 years
n=5 Participants
|
69 years
n=7 Participants
|
69 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post procedure and 24 hoursTo establish the effect of high-frequency stimulation TENS on the pain experienced by patients undergoing a bone-marrow biopsy, using standard technique with local anaesthetic. The perception of pain will be measured using a pain scale directly after and 24 hours after bone-marrow sampling in patients randomly allocated and blinded to the use of intervention-TENS (IT) or control-TENS (CT) in addition to local anaesthesia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TENS Intervention
n=35 Participants
The concealed electrical parameter in this group will be within the therapeutic window, that is, well above the sensory detection threshold but below the pain threshold giving a "strong but comfortable sensation". From previous studies, this is likely to be 50-110Hz.
The device will be activated prior to entry into the treatment room and 2 minutes before administration of local anaesthetic and for 2 minutes after removal of the biopsy needle. This will cover the expected duration of pain as assessed in the pilot study.
All patients will receive standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide)
|
TENS Placebo Comparator
n=35 Participants
Placebo Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at the lowest sensory threshold and an Active Comparator group where the TENS machine will be set at a recognised analgesic level (\>50Hz and below the pain threshold for the patient).
Standard pain relief (ie. local anaesthetic with or without inhaled nitrous oxide): All patients will receive standard pain
|
|---|---|---|
|
Perception of Pain Will be Measured Using a Validated Numerical 0-10 Pain Scale Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain
Mean Pain Score immediately post procedure
|
5.6 Numerical Pain Severity Scale (0-10)
Interval 4.8 to 6.4
|
5.7 Numerical Pain Severity Scale (0-10)
Interval 4.8 to 6.6
|
|
Perception of Pain Will be Measured Using a Validated Numerical 0-10 Pain Scale Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain
Mean pain score 24 hours post procedure
|
1.9 Numerical Pain Severity Scale (0-10)
Interval 1.2 to 2.6
|
1.9 Numerical Pain Severity Scale (0-10)
Interval 1.1 to 2.6
|
Adverse Events
TENS Intervention
TENS Placebo Comparator
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place