Trial Outcomes & Findings for Observation of Benefits for Patients Implanted With a Hearing Implant of the Company Cochlear (NCT NCT02004353)
NCT ID: NCT02004353
Last Updated: 2021-11-08
Results Overview
A scale from 0 to 10 is used, where 0 represents "can not hear at all" and 10 "hear perfectly". The change from baseline to post-implant at 1 year is presented. A positive value indicates improved hearing, a negative value indicates impaired hearing.
TERMINATED
1518 participants
Baseline (i.e. pre-implanted status, prior to 1st switch-on) and post-implant at 1 year
2021-11-08
Participant Flow
1518 participants were recruited in 77 centers from July 2011 to 31 July 2020
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1518
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
184
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1334
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Voluntary participation
|
1334
|
Baseline Characteristics
Observation of Benefits for Patients Implanted With a Hearing Implant of the Company Cochlear
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
n=1506 Participants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<18
|
48 Participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
18-34
|
351 Participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
35-44
|
194 Participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
45-54
|
268 Participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
55-64
|
293 Participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>64
|
348 Participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Unknown
|
4 Participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
789 Participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
717 Participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
|
396 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
|
62 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
|
47 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
|
20 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
197 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Austria
|
2 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
2 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
|
3 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
|
31 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
7 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
193 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
2 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
|
200 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Slovenia
|
16 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
36 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
292 participants
n=1506 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (i.e. pre-implanted status, prior to 1st switch-on) and post-implant at 1 yearPopulation: For all devices with 50 or more participants with baseline data, analysis of the SSQ data was performed.
A scale from 0 to 10 is used, where 0 represents "can not hear at all" and 10 "hear perfectly". The change from baseline to post-implant at 1 year is presented. A positive value indicates improved hearing, a negative value indicates impaired hearing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
n=327 Participants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
CI522 cochlear implant
|
2.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
CI532 cochlear implant
|
2.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
Baha bone conduction hearing implant
|
2.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
CI512 cochlear implant
|
2.73 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.148
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (i.e. pre-implanted status, prior to 1st switch-on) and post-implant at 2 yearsPopulation: For all devices with 50 or more participants with baseline data, analysis of the SSQ data was performed.
A scale from 0 to 10 is used, where 0 represents "can not hear at all" and 10 "hear perfectly". The change from baseline to post-implant at 2 years is presented. A positive value indicates improved hearing, a negative value indicates impaired hearing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
n=160 Participants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
CI512 cochlear implant
|
2.95 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.179
|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
CI522 cochlear implant
|
2.4 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.31
|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
CI532 cochlear implant
|
2.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
Baha bone conduction hearing implant
|
1.9 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.65
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (i.e. pre-implanted status, prior to 1st switch-on) and post-implant at 3 yearsPopulation: For all devices with 50 or more participants with baseline data, analysis of the SSQ data was performed.There were too few Baha participants at years 3 to conduct a statistical analysis.
A scale from 0 to 10 is used, where 0 represents "can not hear at all" and 10 "hear perfectly". The change from baseline to post-implant at 3 years is presented. A positive value indicates improved hearing, a negative value indicates impaired hearing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
n=69 Participants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
CI512 cochlear implant
|
2.74 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.217
|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
CI522 cochlear implant
|
2.4 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.39
|
|
Change in Hearing Ability Assessed Via Speech Spatial Hearing Qualities Questionnaire
CI532 cochlear implant
|
2.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (i.e. pre-implanted status, prior to 1st switch-on) and post-implant at 1 yearPopulation: For all devices with 50 or more participants with baseline data, analysis of the HUI3 data was performed.
A health utility value of 1.00 indicates perfect health while a score of 0.00 indicates death. The change from baseline to post-implant at 1 year is presented. A positive value indicates an improved quality of life, a negative value indicates impaired quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
n=327 Participants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Change in General Quality of Life Assessed Via Health Utility Index Mark III Questionnaire
CI512 cochlear implant
|
0.166 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0212
|
|
Change in General Quality of Life Assessed Via Health Utility Index Mark III Questionnaire
CI522 cochlear implant
|
0.22 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.032
|
|
Change in General Quality of Life Assessed Via Health Utility Index Mark III Questionnaire
CI532 cochlear implant
|
0.15 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.034
|
|
Change in General Quality of Life Assessed Via Health Utility Index Mark III Questionnaire
Baha bone conduction hearing implant
|
0.12 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (i.e. pre-implanted status, prior to 1st switch-on) and post-implant at 2 yearsPopulation: For all devices with 50 or more participants with baseline data, analysis of the HUI3 data was performed.There were too few Baha participants at 2 years to conduct a statistical analysis.
A health utility value of 1.00 indicates perfect health while a score of 0.00 indicates death. The change from baseline to post-implant at 2 years is presented. A positive value indicates an improved quality of life, a negative value indicates impaired quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
n=151 Participants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Change in General Quality of Life Assessed Via Health Utility Index Mark III Questionnaire
CI512 cochlear implant
|
0.175 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0255
|
|
Change in General Quality of Life Assessed Via Health Utility Index Mark III Questionnaire
CI522 cochlear implant
|
0.28 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Change in General Quality of Life Assessed Via Health Utility Index Mark III Questionnaire
CI532 cochlear implant
|
0.15 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (i.e. pre-implanted status, prior to 1st switch-on) and post-implant at 3 yearsPopulation: For all devices with 50 or more participants with baseline data, analysis of the HUI3 data was performed.There were too few Baha participants at 3 years to conduct a statistical analysis.
A health utility value of 1.00 indicates perfect health while a score of 0.00 indicates death. The change from baseline to post-implant at 3 years is presented. A positive value indicates an improved quality of life, a negative value indicates impaired quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
n=71 Participants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Change in General Quality of Life Assessed Via Health Utility Index Mark III Questionnaire
CI522 cochlear implant
|
0.22 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.051
|
|
Change in General Quality of Life Assessed Via Health Utility Index Mark III Questionnaire
CI532 cochlear implant
|
0.27 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
|
|
Change in General Quality of Life Assessed Via Health Utility Index Mark III Questionnaire
CI512 cochlear implant
|
0.123 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0311
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (i.e. pre-implant status) assessed prior to 1st switch-onPopulation: Results are for Baha participants. For the contra-lateral ear, data not received for all participants.
Unaided hearing thresholds for bone and air conduction for the implanted and non-implanted ear to monitor clinically significant changes over time for frequencies between 500 Hz and 4000 Hz
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
n=173 Participants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Unaided Hearing Thresholds
Air conduction-implanted ear
|
71.7 Decibel
Standard Deviation 21.6
|
|
Unaided Hearing Thresholds
Bone conduction-implanted ear
|
34.1 Decibel
Standard Deviation 24.4
|
|
Unaided Hearing Thresholds
Air conduction-contralateral year
|
36.7 Decibel
Standard Deviation 26.5
|
|
Unaided Hearing Thresholds
Bone conduction-contralateral ear
|
18.1 Decibel
Standard Deviation 15.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: post-implant at 1 yearPopulation: Results are for Baha participants. For the contra-lateral ear, data not received for all participants.
Unaided hearing thresholds for bone and air conduction for the implanted and non-implanted ear to monitor clinically significant changes over time for frequencies between 500 and 4000 Hz
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
n=173 Participants
Nucleus Cochlear implants, Cochlear Baha implants, Cochlear Acoustic Implants
|
|---|---|
|
Unaided Hearing Thresholds
Air conduction-Implanted ear
|
60.2 Decibel
Standard Deviation 24.2
|
|
Unaided Hearing Thresholds
Bone conduction-implanted ear
|
29.4 Decibel
Standard Deviation 20.0
|
|
Unaided Hearing Thresholds
Air conduction- Contralateral ear
|
37.5 Decibel
Standard Deviation 24.5
|
|
Unaided Hearing Thresholds
Bone conduction-Contralateral ear
|
18.1 Decibel
Standard Deviation 13.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: immediately post-implantPopulation: Data not received due to voluntary participation of participants.
Unaided hearing thresholds for bone and air conduction for the implanted and non-implanted ear to monitor clinically significant changes over time for frequencies between 125Hz and 8000 Hz
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: post-implant at 2 yearsPopulation: Data not received due to voluntary participation of participants.
Unaided hearing thresholds for bone and air conduction for the implanted and non-implanted ear to monitor clinically significant changes over time for frequencies between 125Hz and 8000 Hz
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Cochlear® Hearing Implants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place