Efficacy of Propafenone Versus Dronedarone for the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
NCT ID: NCT01991119
Last Updated: 2013-11-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
98 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-05-31
2013-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of propafenone and dronedarone to maintain sinus rhythm after DC cardioversion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Propafenone
Propafenone group
Propafenone
Dronedarone
Dronedarone group
Dronedarone
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Propafenone
Dronedarone
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* NYHA class III or IV heart failure
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35%
* second or third AV block
* sick sinus syndrome
* heart rate \< 50 beat per minute
* myocardiac infarction within 3 months
* pregnant women
* severe hepatic dysfunction
* QT prolongation \> 500ms or PR interval \> 180ms
* history of hypersensitivity for drug
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samsung Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Young Keun On
Principle investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Young Keun On, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Samsung Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cardiac and Vascular Center
Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chun KJ, Byeon K, Im SI, Park KM, Park SJ, Kim JS, On YK. Efficacy of dronedarone versus propafenone in the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. Clin Ther. 2014 Sep 1;36(9):1169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-03-085-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id