Effect of HSA or Saline Diluent on Immunotherapy Extract Stability as Determined by Graded ID Skin Tests

NCT ID: NCT01989897

Last Updated: 2021-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a double-blind study with respect to the diluents used, with patients known to be allergic to the specific allergen tested. Three study sites will be involved, each testing one allergen (Cat, Mite, Timothy grass pollen). Subjects who are known to be allergic to the allergen in question will be tested with serial three-fold dilutions to determine the ID 50 and relative extract potency using the method described by Turkeltaub.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The specific objective of this study is to determine the stability of immunotherapy extract dilutions. Higher dilutions (lower potency) have been shown in vitro to decrease in potency over time more rapidly than less dilute preparations. The investigators hope to determine whether there is a detectable difference in skin test reaction of dilutions of three common antigens (Cat, Timothy Grass, Dust Mite). The diluents used strongly affect the strength when extract potency is tested in vitro. Therefore, the investigators expect to find a detectable difference in skin test potency based on the diluents used (Saline vs. HSA Saline \[300mcg/ml\]).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

diluent rhinitis allergic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

diluents

Negative control = diluent, saline with HSA--phenol Positive control = saline with 1mg/ml Histamine base

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

saline with 1mg/ml Histamine base

Intervention Type DRUG

diluent, saline with HSA--phenol

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

saline with 1mg/ml Histamine base

Intervention Type DRUG

diluent, saline with HSA--phenol

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

HSA 300mcg/ml (0.03%) and Saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. Subjects must demonstrate their willingness to participate in the study and comply with its procedures by signing a written informed consent.

2\. Subjects of either gender, ages 18-60 years, with a history of allergic rhinitis related to exposure to the allergen of interest.

3\. Previous positive routine skin test to the allergen to be tested: minimum 5mm wheal diameter with 10,000BAU/mL cat or minimum 5mm wheal diameter with 10,000AU/mL Dermatophagoides farinae or minimum 8mm wheal diameter with timothy 100,000BAU/mL.

4\. AND (in addition to #3) sum of erythema after SPT of at least 50mm or erythema in largest diameter of at least 30mm.

5\. Subject's skin coloring should permit evaluation of erythema. 6. Ability to stop medication that might interfere with the results of the skin prick test.

Exclusion Criteria

\- 1. Spirometry with FEV1 below 80% of predicted normal value and/or poorly controlled asthma 2. Known pregnancy 3. Patients with a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reactions. 4. Patients with absolute necessity of antihistamines to control their allergies 5. Patients with active and extensive atopic dermatitis. 6. Patients that take psychotropic medication. 7. General skin hyperreactivity (Negative control greater than 3 mm wheal diameter) or with known tendency for dermatographic urticaria.

8\. Patients currently under allergen immunotherapy treatment or with a history of immunotherapy treatment within the last 5 years to the extract to be tested in this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bryan Martin, DO

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bryan Martin, DO

DO

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bryan Martin, DO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ohio State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Martha Morehouse Medical Plaza, 2050 Kenny Rd,Suite 2200 and Suite 2600

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012H0217

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id