Effects of Hallux Valgus Deformity on Rear Foot Position, Pain, Function, and Quality of Life in Women
NCT ID: NCT01989338
Last Updated: 2013-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
27 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-03-31
2013-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hallux valgus patients
Females patients with hallux valgus asses for pain, function, and quality of life
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having bilateral deformity with right-dominance,
* First MTP angle of \> 15° as radiologically determined by the referring physician,
* Deformity intensity \> 2 based on the Manchester scale,
* Muscle forces on ankle and foot \> 4
* Having no systemic disease that affects foot biomechanics with no history of surgery,
* Having no neurological problems,
* Having no cognitive, mental, or psychological problems.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
55 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hacettepe University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gursoy Coskun
Hacettepe University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Burcu TALU, PT. MSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
İnönü University, School of Malatya Health, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
Gürsoy COŞKUN, PT. PhD.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara, TURKEY
Nilgün BEK, PT. PhD.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara, TURKEY
Kezban BAYRAMLAR, PT. PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara, TURKEY
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Jul;28(7):759-77. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0759.
Bock P, Kristen KH, Kroner A, Engel A. Hallux valgus and cartilage degeneration in the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Jul;86(5):669-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.14766.
Robinson AH, Limbers JP. Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Aug;87(8):1038-45. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B8.16467. No abstract available.
Menz HB, Lord SR. Foot problems, functional impairment, and falls in older people. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999 Sep;89(9):458-67. doi: 10.7547/87507315-89-9-458.
Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jun;78(6):932-66. No abstract available.
Bek N, Kürklü B. Comparison of the effects of different conservative treatment methods in treatment of hallux valgus. [Halluks valgus tedavisinde kullanılan farklı konservatif yöntemlerin etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması.] Article in Turkish. Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi 2002;13:90-93.
Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus. Causes, evaluation, and treatment. Postgrad Med. 1984 Apr;75(5):174-8, 183, 186-7. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1984.11698000. No abstract available.
Uchiyama E, Kitaoka HB, Luo ZP, Grande JP, Kura H, An KN. Pathomechanics of hallux valgus: biomechanical and immunohistochemical study. Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Sep;26(9):732-8. doi: 10.1177/107110070502600911.
Coughlin MJ, Thompson FM. The high price of high-fashion footwear. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:371-7. No abstract available.
Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M. Prevalence and associations of hallux valgus in a primary care population. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jun 15;59(6):857-62. doi: 10.1002/art.23709.
Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus--etiology, anatomy, treatment and surgical considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Jun;(157):31-41.
Dawson J, Thorogood M, Marks SA, Juszczak E, Dodd C, Lavis G, Fitzpatrick R. The prevalence of foot problems in older women: a cause for concern. J Public Health Med. 2002 Jun;24(2):77-84. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/24.2.77.
SIM-FOOK L, HODGSON AR. A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Oct;40-A(5):1058-62. No abstract available.
BARNICOT NA, HARDY RH. The position of the hallux in West Africans. J Anat. 1955 Jul;89(3):355-61. No abstract available.
Menz HB, Morris ME. Footwear characteristics and foot problems in older people. Gerontology. 2005 Sep-Oct;51(5):346-51. doi: 10.1159/000086373.
Piggott H. The natural history of hallux valgus in adolescence and early adult life. J Bone Joint Surg. 1960;42(B):749-60.
Saro C, Jensen I, Lindgren U, Fellander-Tsai L. Quality-of-life outcome after hallux valgus surgery. Qual Life Res. 2007 Jun;16(5):731-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9192-6. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
Abhishek A, Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M. Are hallux valgus and big toe pain associated with impaired quality of life? A cross-sectional study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Jul;18(7):923-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
Menz HB, Roddy E, Thomas E, Croft PR. Impact of hallux valgus severity on general and foot-specific health-related quality of life. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Mar;63(3):396-404. doi: 10.1002/acr.20396. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
Lazarides SP, Hildreth A, Prassanna V, Talkhani I. Association amongst angular deformities in halluks valgus and impact of the deformity in health-related quality of life. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2005;11:193-6.
Annett M. The distribution of manual asymmetry. Br J Psychol. 1972 Aug;63(3):343-58. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1972.tb01282.x. No abstract available.
Karadağ A, Kutlu M. Effects of long-term football exercises on auido-visual reaction times on players' dominant and non-dominant feet [Uzun dönem futbol antrenmanların futbolcuların baskın ve baskın olmayan ayaklarının görsel işitsel reaksiyon zamanlarına etkileri]. Article in Turkish. Fırat Tıp Dergisi. 2006;11:26-29.
Gabbard C. Foot laterality during childhood: a review. Int J Neurosci. 1993 Oct;72(3-4):175-82. doi: 10.3109/00207459309024106.
Garrow AP, Papageorgiou A, Silman AJ, Thomas E, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ. The grading of hallux valgus. The Manchester Scale. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001 Feb;91(2):74-8. doi: 10.7547/87507315-91-2-74.
Mendell JR, Florence J. Manual muscle testing. Muscle Nerve. 1990;13 Suppl:S16-20. doi: 10.1002/mus.880131307. No abstract available.
Lamur KS, Huson A, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R. Geometric data of hallux valgus feet. Foot Ankle Int. 1996 Sep;17(9):548-54. doi: 10.1177/107110079601700907.
Gajdosik RL, Bohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 1987 Dec;67(12):1867-72. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.12.1867.
Giladi M, Milgrom C, Stein M. The low arch: A protective factor in stress fractures: A prospective study of 295 military recruits. Orthop Rev. 1985;14:81-4.
Dahle LK, Mueller MJ, Delitto A, Diamond JE. Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;14(2):70-4. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.14.2.70.
Hills AP, Hennig EM, McDonald M, Bar-Or O. Plantar pressure differences between obese and non-obese adults: a biomechanical analysis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Nov;25(11):1674-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801785.
Knutzen KM, Price A. Lower extremity static and dynamic relationships with rearfoot motion in gait. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1994 Apr;84(4):171-80. doi: 10.7547/87507315-84-4-171.
McPoil T, Cornwall MW. Relationship between neutral subtalar joint position and pattern of rearfoot motion during walking. Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Mar;15(3):141-5. doi: 10.1177/107110079401500309.
Menz HB. Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998 Mar;88(3):119-29. doi: 10.7547/87507315-88-3-119.
Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118863.
Agel J, Beskin JL, Brage M, Guyton GP, Kadel NJ, Saltzman CL, Sands AK, Sangeorzan BJ, SooHoo NF, Stroud CC, Thordarson DB. Reliability of the Foot Function Index:: A report of the AOFAS Outcomes Committee. Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Nov;26(11):962-7. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601112.
Baumhauer JF, Nawoczenski DA, DiGiovanni BF, Wilding GE. Reliability and validity of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating Scale: a pilot study for the hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Dec;27(12):1014-9. doi: 10.1177/107110070602701202.
Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Ölmez N, Memiş A. Turkish reliability and validity of SF-36. [SF-36 nın Türkçe için güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği.] Article in Turkish. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi 1999;12:102-6.
Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(6):561-70. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90220-4.
SooHoo NF, Shuler M, Fleming LL; American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Jan;24(1):50-5. doi: 10.1177/107110070302400108.
Tüzün Ç, Tıkız C. Foot problems in the elderly. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics. 2003;6:135-41.
Scott G, Menz HB, Newcombe L. Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture. 2007 Jun;26(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
HARDY RH, CLAPHAM JC. Observations on hallux valgus; based on a controlled series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951 Aug;33-B(3):376-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.33B3.376. No abstract available.
Nork SE, Coughlin RR. How to examine a foot and what to do with a bunion. Prim Care. 1996 Jun;23(2):281-97. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70276-1.
Wong YS. Influence of the abductor hallucis muscle on the medial arch of the foot: a kinematic and anatomical cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 2007 May;28(5):617-20. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0617.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LUT09/37-26
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id