Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparing the Rate of Insufficient Cells for Diagnosis Between Surepath® and Conventional Smear in Women After Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer (NCT NCT01988376)
NCT ID: NCT01988376
Last Updated: 2019-01-03
Results Overview
Comparing the percentage of smears, that were difficulty in making a definite diagnosis from smear owing to insufficient cells, between Surepath® and Conventional Smear in Women after Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer
COMPLETED
NA
258 participants
1 year
2019-01-03
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Women With Cervical Cancer Receive Surepath for Screening
Women will receive Surepath as a tool for screening the recurrence of cervical cancer.
Surepath: A liquid-base method of Pap smear for screening the recurrence of cervical cancer
|
Women Receive Conventional Pap Smear for Screening
Women who will receive conventional Pap smear for screening
Conventional Pap smear: Conventional Pap smear
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
129
|
129
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
129
|
129
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Comparing the Rate of Insufficient Cells for Diagnosis Between Surepath® and Conventional Smear in Women After Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Women With Cervical Cancer Receive Surepath for Screening
n=129 Participants
Women will receive Surepath as a tool for screening the recurrence of cervical cancer.
Surepath: A liquid-base method of Pap smear for screening the recurrence of cervical cancer
|
Women Receive Conventional Pap Smear for Screening
n=129 Participants
Women who will receive conventional Pap smear for screening
Conventional Pap smear: Conventional Pap smear
|
Total
n=258 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.44 • n=5 Participants
|
58.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.13 • n=7 Participants
|
57.97 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.79 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
|
129 participants
n=5 Participants
|
129 participants
n=7 Participants
|
258 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: Patients with cervical cancer who received radiation therapy
Comparing the percentage of smears, that were difficulty in making a definite diagnosis from smear owing to insufficient cells, between Surepath® and Conventional Smear in Women after Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Women Received Surepath for Screening
n=18 Participants
Women who received Surepath for screening the recurrence of cervical cancer.
|
Women Received Conventional Pap Smear for Screening
n=21 Participants
Women who received conventional Pap smear for screening the recurrence of cervical cancer.
|
|---|---|---|
|
the Percentage of Smears, That Were Difficulty in Making a Definite Diagnosis
|
0 percentage of smears
|
0 percentage of smears
|
Adverse Events
Women With Cervical Cancer Receive Surepath for Screening
Women Receive Conventional Pap Smear for Screening
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place