CAndesartan vs LIsinopril Effects on the BRain

NCT ID: NCT01984164

Last Updated: 2021-02-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

176 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-20

Study Completion Date

2018-12-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to conduct a 1-year double blind randomized control trial comparing candesartan to lisinopril in 140 individuals with hypertension and executive mild cognitive impairment in their effects on executive function, neuroimaging markers, and vascular indicators.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* Hypertension is associated with cognitive impairment even in the absence of clinical dementia. To date, no specific treatment is available for this pattern of mild cognitive impairment related to hypertension.
* Objectives or purpose: The aims of this study are to investigate the effects of candesartan on executive function decline and on changes in cerebral perfusion, cerebrovascular reserve and microvascular brain injury. The study also intends to identify potential underlying mechanisms related to vascular structure and function, including atherosclerosis, vascular inflammation, vascular stiffness, and endothelial progenitor cells, by which candesartan may affect the cognitive and cerebrovascular outcomes.
* Study methodology:This is a double blind randomized clinical trial that will be conducted in 140 individuals (70 in the candesartan group, 70 in the lisinopril group). Our target population is subjects: 55 years or older with hypertension and Executive Mild Cognitive Impairment.
* Endpoints to be measured:Our measures include cognitive function, cerebral perfusion and reserve, markers of vascular brain damage, atherosclerosis, stiffness, vascular inflammation and endothelial function.
* Description of intervention, follow-up, and duration of study: Eligible participants will undergo randomization into 2 groups and will be seen frequently until their blood pressure is controlled (\<140/90 mmHg). Participants will be seen at 3, 6 and 12 months afterwards.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension Mild Cognitive Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Candesartan

To achieve blood pressure control, we will use a stepwise protocol as follows: candesartan (blinded) 8mg→ 16mg→ 32mg. Both groups will also receive (unblinded) , if needed to achieve blood pressure control, HCTZ 12.5mg→ 25mg, Amlodipine 2.5mg→ 5mg →10mg and metoprolol succinate extended release 12.5mg→ 25mg→ 50mg. Antihypertensive medications will be increased every 2 weeks until control is achieved.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Candesartan

Intervention Type DRUG

blinded

Lisinopril

To achieve blood pressure control we will use a stepwise protocol as follows: lisinopril (blinded) 10mg→ 20mg→ 40mg. Both groups will also receive (unblinded), if needed to achieve blood pressure control, HCTZ 12.5mg→ 25mg, Amlodipine 2.5mg→ 5mg→ 10mg and metoprolol succinate extended release 12.5mg→ 25mg→ 50mg. Antihypertensive medications will be increased every 2 weeks until control is achieved.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lisinopril

Intervention Type DRUG

Blinded

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Candesartan

blinded

Intervention Type DRUG

Lisinopril

Blinded

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Atacand

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. age: 55 years or older;
2. Hypertension: SBP≥140 mm Hg or DBP≥ 90 mm or receiving antihypertensive medications.
3. Executive MCI will be defined using these criteria:

1. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score less than or equal to 26
2. Executive dysfunction: A performance at the 10th percentile or below on at least one of four screening tests for executive function: Trail Making Test, Part B (TMT-B), modified Stroop interference, Digit Span and Digit Sequencing, and Letter fluency.
3. Minimal Functional limitation as reflected by the Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ)≤7

Exclusion Criteria

1. Intolerance to study drugs;
2. SBP \>200 or DBP \>110 mm Hg;
3. Renal disease or hyperkalemia
4. Active medical or psychiatric problems
5. Uncontrolled congestive heart failure;
6. History of stroke in the past 3 years;
7. Inability to perform the study procedures
8. Women of childbearing potential
9. diagnosis of dementia
10. In those who lack decision capacity, a study surrogate who can sign on their behalf will be required. Since we are enrolling only those with MCI, we anticipate that most participants will have decision capacity
11. Current use of Lithium, as most antihypertensive classes may lead to increased lithium toxic levels.
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ihab Hajjar

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ihab Hajjar, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory Univeristy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emory Univeristy

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hajjar I, Okafor M, McDaniel D, Obideen M, Dee E, Shokouhi M, Quyyumi AA, Levey A, Goldstein F. Effects of Candesartan vs Lisinopril on Neurocognitive Function in Older Adults With Executive Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012252. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12252.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32761160 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01AG042127

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB00070087

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.