Safety & Effectiveness Study of AEGEA Vapor System to Treat Excessive Uterine Bleeding

NCT ID: NCT01979861

Last Updated: 2016-07-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

230 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if the AEGEA Vapor System for endometrial ablation is safe and effective for reducing menstrual blood loss in women with excessive uterine bleeding (menorrhagia)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a single-arm, multi-center study with three years of follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Menorrhagia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

vapor endometrial ablation

endometrial ablation using the AEGEA Vapor System

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AEGEA Vapor System(TM)

Intervention Type DEVICE

vapor endometrial ablation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AEGEA Vapor System(TM)

vapor endometrial ablation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female subject from (and including) age 30 to 50 years
* Self-reported history of heavy menstrual bleeding in at least 3 of the last 6 months
* Predictable cyclic menstrual cycles over past 6 months
* Excessive uterine bleeding
* Premenopausal at enrollment
* Normal PAP
* Normal endometrial biopsy
* Willing to use reliable contraception
* Not currently taking hormonal medication
* Agree to use sponsor provided catamenial product (sanitary pads/tampons)

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant
* Desires future childbearing
* Presence of an IUD
* Previous endometrial ablation procedure
* Evidence of STI
* Evidence of PID
* Active infection of genitals, vagina, cervix, uterus or urinary tract
* Active endometritis
* Active bacteremia, sepsis or other active systemic infection
* Gynecologic malignancy
* Endometrial hyperplasia
* Known clotting defects or bleeding disorders
* On anticoagulant therapy
* Hemoglobin \<8gm/dl
* Prior uterine surgery
* Currently on medication that could thin myometrial muscle
* Severe dysmenorrhea, secondary to adenomyosis
* Abnormal uterine cavity
* Hydrosalpinx
* Uterine length \<6cm or \>12cm
* Currently in other clinical trial
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aegea Medical, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark Levie, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Montefiore Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Center for Fertility and Women's Health

New Britain, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Clinical Associates of Orlando, LLC

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Visions Clinical Research

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

Rosemark WomenCares Specialists

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

The Advanced Gynecologic Surgery Institute

Naperville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Basinksi, LLC

Newburgh, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Minnesota Gynecology & Surgery

Edina, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mercy Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Carolina Women's Research and Wellness Center/OB-GYN

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga Medical Research, LLC

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Baylor All Saints

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de la Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Monterrey, N.l., Mexico

Site Status

Isala Klinieken

Zwolle, Overijissel, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Mexico Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leyland N, Harris M. Water Vapor Endometrial Ablation for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: 36-Month Follow-Up of a Prospective, Multicenter Pivotal Clinical Trial. Int J Womens Health. 2021 Feb 10;13:169-176. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S279864. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33603496 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SE-3000

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

UA Versus UAE in Treatment of Fibroids
NCT04832906 COMPLETED PHASE4