Clavicle Splint for Pain Reduction After Posterior Cervicothoracic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT01977690
Last Updated: 2017-08-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Scapula Fractures
NCT00849771
Study of the Effect of Neck Treatment on Shoulder Impingement
NCT00764764
Cervical Plexus Versus Infiltration for Clavicular Operations (CERPICO)
NCT06737237
Subscapularis Repair Augmentation for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
NCT05487677
Conservative Interventions for Treating Clavicle Fractures in Adults
NCT02398006
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After hypothesizing a mean pain reduction through the brace on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain from 5 to 3 with a standard deviation of 1, we calculated that at a power level of 99% and an alpha error of 5%, and given that the VAS numbers were normally distributed, we needed 22 patients to enroll into the study. We increased this number to 30 to account for early and late dropouts.
The study was performed at a single institution with patients from 2 different spine surgeons.
Patients were randomized prior to or the day after the procedure to either wear or not wear the clavicle brace. Randomization was done through closed envelopes that the patients drew. Dissection was performed by the two fellows at our institution and depended solely on the number of fused levels and whether or not a tumor had to be removed. Closure was also performed by the two spine fellows after instruction by the senior author. Cervical alignment was reviewed using the C2-C7 angle according to Cobb's method on lateral images. The cervico-thoracic angles were calculated by the addition of the cervical spine angle and the remaining angles of thoracic spine until T3 according to Cobb's method.
The brace was provided by the hospital. Patients were instructed how to properly wear the brace by the first author, the senior author, or the hospital Rehabilitation Orthotics specialist. To complete the study, patients wore the brace for at least 30 days. (Patients of J.P. continued to wear the brace for 3 months outside of the study period.). All patients wore hard cervical collars until the end of the study period.
Patients self-recorded their average level of pain on a scale from 1 to 10 for each post-surgery day beginning on postoperative day 2. They also recorded the number of pain pills they took each day. On the same sheet used to record medication usage, patients were instructed to record each day whether they were able to wear the brace or if they experienced problems. At their 1 month postoperative visit the incision was inspected and palpated by the first or senior author for the presence of fascial dehiscence and its occurrence was recorded.
Every patient routinely received narcotic and non-narcotic pain medication on an as-needed basis in the hospital. No nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen or ketorolac, were given. If, on a particular postoperative day, patients were still on an intravenous narcotic patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA), that day's data were not recorded for the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Management
Patients wore no brace.
No interventions assigned to this group
Clavicle Brace Wearing
Patient has to wear clavicle brace for one month.
Clavicle Brace
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clavicle Brace
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Stanford University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephan Duetzmann
M.D.,M.Sc.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephan Duetzmann
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stanford University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stanford University Hospital
Stanford, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Duetzmann S, Cole T, Senft C, Seifert V, Ratliff JK, Park J. Clavicle pain and reduction of incisional and fascial pain after posterior cervical surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):684-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE141118. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLABRA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.