Clavicle Splint for Pain Reduction After Posterior Cervicothoracic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01977690

Last Updated: 2017-08-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to see whether a clavicle splint can decrease the pain after posterior cervicothoracic surgery. The term "cervicle splint" conveys that the investigators do not deal with clavicle fractures here but use the splint he stabilize the posterior cervical area. The investigators want to demonstrate this in a prospective randomized manner.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this prospectively controlled randomized study 30 patients who had undergone posterior cervical spine surgery were randomized into two groups who either wore or did not wear a clavicle brace to retract the shoulders. Patients in the brace group began wearing the brace on postoperative day 4, and continuously wore it throughout the 30-day study period. Outcome was measured as daily levels of self-reported pain and number of pain pills taken during the 30-day postoperative period. .

After hypothesizing a mean pain reduction through the brace on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain from 5 to 3 with a standard deviation of 1, we calculated that at a power level of 99% and an alpha error of 5%, and given that the VAS numbers were normally distributed, we needed 22 patients to enroll into the study. We increased this number to 30 to account for early and late dropouts.

The study was performed at a single institution with patients from 2 different spine surgeons.

Patients were randomized prior to or the day after the procedure to either wear or not wear the clavicle brace. Randomization was done through closed envelopes that the patients drew. Dissection was performed by the two fellows at our institution and depended solely on the number of fused levels and whether or not a tumor had to be removed. Closure was also performed by the two spine fellows after instruction by the senior author. Cervical alignment was reviewed using the C2-C7 angle according to Cobb's method on lateral images. The cervico-thoracic angles were calculated by the addition of the cervical spine angle and the remaining angles of thoracic spine until T3 according to Cobb's method.

The brace was provided by the hospital. Patients were instructed how to properly wear the brace by the first author, the senior author, or the hospital Rehabilitation Orthotics specialist. To complete the study, patients wore the brace for at least 30 days. (Patients of J.P. continued to wear the brace for 3 months outside of the study period.). All patients wore hard cervical collars until the end of the study period.

Patients self-recorded their average level of pain on a scale from 1 to 10 for each post-surgery day beginning on postoperative day 2. They also recorded the number of pain pills they took each day. On the same sheet used to record medication usage, patients were instructed to record each day whether they were able to wear the brace or if they experienced problems. At their 1 month postoperative visit the incision was inspected and palpated by the first or senior author for the presence of fascial dehiscence and its occurrence was recorded.

Every patient routinely received narcotic and non-narcotic pain medication on an as-needed basis in the hospital. No nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen or ketorolac, were given. If, on a particular postoperative day, patients were still on an intravenous narcotic patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA), that day's data were not recorded for the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Posterior Cervical Surgery Posterior Cervical Fusion Posterior Cervical Laminectomy Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Management

Patients wore no brace.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Clavicle Brace Wearing

Patient has to wear clavicle brace for one month.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clavicle Brace

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clavicle Brace

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Patient underwent cervicothoracic surgery from posterior -

Exclusion Criteria

\- Patients that are potentially vulnerable
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stephan Duetzmann

M.D.,M.Sc.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephan Duetzmann

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stanford University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University Hospital

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Duetzmann S, Cole T, Senft C, Seifert V, Ratliff JK, Park J. Clavicle pain and reduction of incisional and fascial pain after posterior cervical surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):684-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE141118. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26296190 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLABRA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Shoulder Pacemaker for Scapular Dyskinesia
NCT05116722 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Plating Clavicle Fractures
NCT00871468 UNKNOWN NA