DIVERT: Diversion of Flow in Intracranial VErtebral and Blood Blister-like Ruptured Aneurysms Trial: A Randomized Trial Comparing Pipeline Flow Diversion and Best-Standard-Treatment

NCT ID: NCT01976026

Last Updated: 2016-11-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the DIVERT study is to provide a prudent, controlled clinical context for the use of flow diversion, a promising option of yet unproven benefit, in the care of patients with acute blood blister-like and dissecting intradural aneurysms. Hence DIVERT is a simple, multicenter, randomized trial integrated into daily practice. DIVERT addresses the clinical dilemma of whether the use of PED FD truly is a safe and effective alternative to best standard treatment, defined as conventional methods of treatment or in some cases, observation. Selection criteria are few, to facilitate the recruitment of most affected patients confronted with these difficult aneurysms that their physician judges suitable for PED FD. The trial does not obstruct clinical care, does not include extra tests or risks beyond what is necessary and proven beneficial. Endpoints are simple, clinical, meaningful, valuable and resistant to bias. Follow-up visits and tests are "routine', imposing no extra burden on clinical transactions. Data is collected in simple case-report forms filled by physicians.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ruptured blood blister-like (BB) and dissecting vertebral aneurysms are infrequent but devastating causes of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), prone to acute rebleeding with poor clinical outcomes despite current surgical or endovascular treatment. Flow diversion (PED FD) with the Pipeline Endovascular Device (PED) is a promising treatment alternative to conventional management options.

The DIVERT trial is designed to provide a prudent, controlled clinical framework for offering the PED FD , a promising yet unproven option in the care of patients with acute blood blister-like or dissecting vertebral aneurysms. DIVERT is a care trial, designed as a simple, pragmatic, multicenter, randomized trial integrated into daily practice with inclusive selection criteria.

The investigators hypothesize that PED FD can decrease poor outcomes from 30 to 15%, compared to 'best standard treatment' (BST). BST is chosen prior to randomization amongst 4 options: observation, coiling with or without stenting, parent vessel occlusion or surgical clipping or wrapping. Patients are enrolled within 48 hours of SAH using standard 1:1 randomization between PED FD and BST after informed consent has been obtained from the patient or surrogate decision maker(s). Patients for whom no other option than PED FD appears feasible and safe will be included in a registry conducted alongside the trial.

Blister-like aneurysms and intradural dissections presenting with SAH have a high propensity for rebleeding and outcomes are poor in approximately one third of the cases, despite treatment using surgical or endovascular techniques.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ruptured Aneurysm of Intracranial Artery

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Flow Diversion Aneurysm Intracranial Cerebral Vertebral blood blister-like ruptured aneurysm Pipeline Flow Diversion Pipeline Flow Diverter Best-Standard Treatment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endovascular treatment with flow diversion

Endovascular treatment with flow diversion, including standard management of thrombo-embolic risk. The goal of the treatment procedure is (as usual) to prevent rebleeding, while keeping treatment-related risks as low as possible.

This trial permits the interventionist or surgeon to use any device, technique or drug judged important to the safety and success of the endovascular or surgical procedure, at his/her discretion at any time during the procedure. It is imperative that the allocated procedure is conducted in the safest possible manner. The interventionist or surgeon may switch to an alternative BST or cross-over to the alternative treatment group, if it is in the best interest of the patient.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Flow Diversion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Best standard therapy

May be any of the following:

Conservative management when no surgical or endovascular treatment is considered possible or reasonable

Conventional endovascular options including coiling with or without high-porosity stenting, and stent-in stent techniques

Parent vessel occlusion, with or without bypass

Surgical clipping or clip-wrapping (including parent vessel occlusion as a salvage procedure).

Choice of best option is based on the location, anatomy, and particular circumstances, before randomization for this patient's aneurysm.

This trial permits the interventionist or surgeon to use any device, technique or drug judged important to the safety and success of the endovascular or surgical procedure, at his/her discretion at any time during the procedure. The interventionist or surgeon may switch to an alternative BST or cross-over to the alternative treatment group, if it is in the best interest of the patient.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Best Standard Therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Flow Diversion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Best Standard Therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Best standard therapy, which may be any of the following: B1. Conservative management when no surgical or endovascular treatment is considered possible or reasonable B2. Conventional endovascular options including coiling with or without high-porosity stenting, and stent-in stent techniques B3. Parent vessel occlusion, with or without bypass B4. Surgical clipping or clip-wrapping (including parent vessel occlusion as a salvage procedure).

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A patient affected with a blood blister-like aneurysm or a dissecting aneurysm, vertebral or at other sites, responsible for a recent subarachnoid hemorrhage (\<14 days) for whom PED FD is considered an appropriate therapeutic option by the participating clinician. Current indications may be (but not restricted to) symptomatic blister-like aneurysms and dissecting intradural vertebral aneurysms.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Severe allergy, intolerance or bleeding disorder that prohibit the use of Acetyl Salicylic Acid (ASA), clopidogrel or other platelet inhibitors
2. Acute hydrocephalus or intracranial hematomas necessitating urgent ventricular drainage or surgical evacuation (patients may be recruited after these urgent interventions have been performed)
3. Absolute contraindication to endovascular treatment or anesthesia.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean Raymond, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CE13.114

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id