Evaluation of a Mental Health Physician Support Program in Nova Scotia

NCT ID: NCT01975948

Last Updated: 2021-10-14

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 285 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2013-11-30
• Study Completion Date: 2015-12-31

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to test the program's effectiveness in a primary care setting in reducing stigma among medical personnel, increasing the comfort level of physicians and staff in providing care to those living with mental illness, and in improving client well-being and mental health.

Detailed Description

Skill-based approaches are effective in reducing stigma in health professionals.

Overview: The Nova Scotia (NS) Department of Health and Wellness and the Mental Health Commission of Canada launched a demonstration project in NS-Adult Mental Health Practice Support Program. Originating in British Columbia (BC), it uses a novel learning platform which supports primary healthcare providers with treatment and management of mental illness. We hypothesized that enhanced skills in program participants would lead to increased comfort on the part of practitioners, diminished social distance and stigmatization; improved clinical outcomes and a reduction in healthcare costs.

This evaluation has three co-primary objectives:

• To determine whether the Mental Health Practice Support Program (PSP) leads to lower levels of stigma among physicians participating in the program.
• To determine whether participation in the Mental Health PSP leads to lower levels of stigma among medical office assistants (MOAs)
• To determine whether participation of physicians in the Mental Health PSP leads to greater improvement in depressive symptom ratings among patients they are treating for depression, compared to treatment as usual.

Two secondary objectives:

• To determine whether participation in the PSP leads to improved occupational functioning compared to treatment as usual.
• To assess the impact of participation in the Mental Health PSP on healthcare costs.

Four exploratory objectives:

• To assess physicians' confidence and comfort in the management of depression treatment
• To determine whether physician participation int he Mental Health PSP is associated with a reduced frequency of antidepressant prescribing.
• To determine whether the patients of physicians participating in the Mental Health PSP report higher levels of satisfaction with the treatment that they receive.
• To determine whether patients participation in the Mental Health PSP is associated with improved quality of life.

Methods: Seventy seven practices with one hundred and eleven community-based family physicians were recruited. Each practice was assigned a practice number. Each physician within the practice was assigned a unique identifier number. Individual practitioner or practice teams were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. Randomization was stratified on the total number of physicians per practice, as well as urban or rural setting to ensure equal distribution of practice clusters and urban and rural groups. STATA, version 12 [College Station, TX, 2012] to generate the sequence for practice [cluster] randomization. Random numbers were generated from a binomial distribution with a probability of success of 0.5. Intervention group participants attended 3 half-day workshops with a "6- week action period" between workshops to practice learnings. Practice support was provided through diagnostic assessment tools, evidence based self-management tools, and on-site practice support coordinator support. A stigma-assessment tool, the Opening Minds Scale for Healthcare Providers (OMS-HC), was administered to both groups at intervention group pre-training, and post-training. Providers comfort and confidence in diagnosing and managing mental illness was also assessed, at comparable times.

Upon completion of the intervention group training, physicians from both groups were asked to identify 3 consecutive evaluable patients. Patients were enrolled and allocated to intervention or control groups as per their associated physician.

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

Mental Health PSP: Physicians

Physicians training in Adult Mental Health Practice Support Program

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Mental Health Practice Support Program

Intervention Type: OTHER

1. training and (2) practice support.

• Three half day workshop sessions over a 24 week period.
• Practice support:

3 evidence based Supported Self Management tools (Cognitive Behavioral Interpersonal Skills Manual,Bounceback program, Antidepressant Skills Workbook), and Practice support coordinator provides guidance to incorporate newly acquired tools, skills, and processes

Treatment as Usual: Physicians

Those administering treatment as usual for depression

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Treatment as Usual

Intervention Type: OTHER

Physicians manage patients with depression as usual

Mental Health PSP: Patients

Those belonging to a physician who has completed the Adult Mental Health Practice Support Program training.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Mental Health Practice Support Program

Intervention Type: OTHER

1. training and (2) practice support.

• Three half day workshop sessions over a 24 week period.
• Practice support:

3 evidence based Supported Self Management tools (Cognitive Behavioral Interpersonal Skills Manual,Bounceback program, Antidepressant Skills Workbook), and Practice support coordinator provides guidance to incorporate newly acquired tools, skills, and processes

Treatment as Usual: Patients

Those receiving treatment as usual for depression

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Treatment as Usual

Intervention Type: OTHER

Physicians manage patients with depression as usual

Interventions

Mental Health Practice Support Program

1. training and (2) practice support.

• Three half day workshop sessions over a 24 week period.
• Practice support:

3 evidence based Supported Self Management tools (Cognitive Behavioral Interpersonal Skills Manual,Bounceback program, Antidepressant Skills Workbook), and Practice support coordinator provides guidance to incorporate newly acquired tools, skills, and processes

Intervention Type: OTHER

Treatment as Usual

Physicians manage patients with depression as usual

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Depression defined by PHQ-9 score of > 10.
• > 18 years old.
• Able to read and speak English.
• Sufficiently intact cognitive functioning (physician judgement).
• Free of urgent or emergent medical or psychiatric issues e.g. unstable cardiovascular disease, suicidal ideation.

Exclusion Criteria

• Not currently under treatment for depression either with an antidepressant medication or psychotherapy.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Nova Scotia Health Authority

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Bianca Horner

Primary Mental Healthcare Education Leader

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Bianca A Lauria-Horner, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Associate Professor Dalhousie University Department of Psychiatry

Scott Patten, FRCP(C), PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor, Departments of Community Health Sciences and Psychiatry, Calgary, Alberta

Locations

Dalhousie University Department of Psychiatry

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Countries

Canada

References

Lauria-Horner B, Beaulieu T, Knaak S, Weinerman R, Campbell H, Patten S. Controlled trial of the impact of a BC adult mental health practice support program (AMHPSP) on primary health care professionals' management of depression. BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Nov 28;19(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0862-y.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 30486799 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

CDHA-RS/2014-150

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id