A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate MEDI4736 in Combination With Tremelimumab
NCT ID: NCT01975831
Last Updated: 2022-10-12
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
104 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-12-19
2021-07-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Phase 1 Study of MEDI4736 in Combination With Tremelimumab in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
NCT02261220
Durvalumab in Combination With Tremelimumab in Subjects With Advanced Rare Solid Tumors
NCT02938793
A Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With Blood Cancers (MK-3475-013/KEYNOTE-013)
NCT01953692
A Phase 1b/2 Safety and Tolerability Study of MEDI6469 in Combination With Therapeutic Immune Agents or Monoclonal Antibodies
NCT02205333
Safety of MB-CART2019.1 in Lymphoma Patients (MB-CART2019.1 Lymphoma / DALY 1)
NCT03870945
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects received durvalumab and tremelimumab over 12 to 13 four-week cycles during the Core Study, with continuous monitoring for safety, clinical efficacy, and biological activity, followed by optional treatment extension with durvalumab for subjects maintaining at least stable disease if agreed upon by the Investigator and Sponsor. After study treatment completion, study assessments were continued for up to 90 days after the last administration of study treatment or until start of alternate therapy, with long-term follow up after study completion for clinical outcomes at least every 6 months for up to 3 years following initiation of treatment.
Study treatment in the Core Study continued for up to 12 months or until confirmed progressive disease (PD), initiation of alternative cancer therapy, observation of unacceptable toxicity, or any other criteria for treatment discontinuation.
Optional treatment extension beyond the Core Study was permitted for subjects who completed the Core Study with a tumor response of stable disease or better and upon agreement by the Sponsor and Investigator. Extended treatment comprised durvalumab monotherapy administered at the recommended fixed dose of 1500 mg administered every 4 weeks (Q4W).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Escalation: 0.3 mg/kg Durva + 3 mg/kg Treme
Subjects received durvalumab (0.3 mg/kg every 2 weeks \[Q2W\] for 13 cycles) and tremelimumab (3 mg/kg every 4 weeks \[Q4W\] for 6 cycles, then every 12 weeks \[Q12W\]). Optional extended treatment comprised durvalumab monotherapy administered at the recommended fixed dose of 1500 mg Q4W.
Durvalumab
Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Tremelimumab
Tremelimumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Escalation: 1 mg/kg Durva + 3 mg/kg Treme
Subjects received durvalumab (1 mg/kg Q2W for 13 cycles) and tremelimumab (3 mg/kg Q4W for 6 cycles, then Q12W). Optional extended treatment comprised durvalumab monotherapy administered at the recommended fixed dose of 1500 mg Q4W.
Durvalumab
Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Tremelimumab
Tremelimumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Escalation: 3 mg/kg Durva + 3 mg/kg Treme
Subjects received durvalumab (3 mg/kg Q2W for 13 cycles) and tremelimumab (3 mg/kg Q4W for 6 cycles, then Q12W). Optional extended treatment comprised durvalumab monotherapy administered at the recommended fixed dose of 1500 mg Q4W.
Durvalumab
Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Tremelimumab
Tremelimumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Escalation: 3 mg/kg Durva + 1 mg/kg Treme
Subjects received durvalumab (3 mg/kg Q2W for 12 or 13 cycles) and tremelimumab (1 mg/kg Q4W for 6 cycles, then Q12W or Q4W for 4 cycles). Optional extended treatment comprised durvalumab monotherapy administered at the recommended fixed dose of 1500 mg Q4W.
Durvalumab
Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Tremelimumab
Tremelimumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Expansion: Ovarian Cancer
Subjects received durvalumab (10 mg/kg Q2W for 13 cycles or 1500 mg Q4W for 12 cycles) and tremelimumab (1 mg/kg or 75 mg Q4W for 4 cycles). Optional extended treatment comprised durvalumab monotherapy administered at the recommended fixed dose of 1500 mg Q4W.
Durvalumab
Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Tremelimumab
Tremelimumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Expansion: Colorectal Cancer
Subjects received durvalumab (10 mg/kg Q2W for 13 cycles or 1500 mg Q4W for 12 cycles) and tremelimumab (1 mg/kg or 75 mg Q4W for 4 cycles). Optional extended treatment comprised durvalumab monotherapy administered at the recommended fixed dose of 1500 mg Q4W.
Durvalumab
Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Tremelimumab
Tremelimumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Expansion: Non-triple Negative Breast Cancer
Subjects received durvalumab (10 mg/kg Q2W for 13 cycles or 1500 mg Q4W for 12 cycles) and tremelimumab (1 mg/kg or 75 mg Q4W for 4 cycles). Optional extended treatment comprised durvalumab monotherapy administered at the recommended fixed dose of 1500 mg Q4W.
Durvalumab
Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Tremelimumab
Tremelimumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Expansion: Renal Cell Carcinoma
Subjects received durvalumab (10 mg/kg Q2W for 13 cycles or 1500 mg Q4W for 12 cycles) and tremelimumab (1 mg/kg or 75 mg Q4W for 4 cycles). Optional extended treatment comprised durvalumab monotherapy administered at the recommended fixed dose of 1500 mg Q4W.
Durvalumab
Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Tremelimumab
Tremelimumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Expansion: Cervical Cancer
Subjects received durvalumab (10 mg/kg Q2W for 13 cycles or 1500 mg Q4W for 12 cycles) and tremelimumab (1 mg/kg or 75 mg Q4W for 4 cycles). Optional extended treatment comprised durvalumab monotherapy administered at the recommended fixed dose of 1500 mg Q4W.
Durvalumab
Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Tremelimumab
Tremelimumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Durvalumab
Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Tremelimumab
Tremelimumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 (± 5) minutes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Failed to respond to or relapsed following standard treatment or declined or was not eligible for standard treatment.
3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-2.
4. Anticipated lifespan greater than 6 months.
5. At the time of Day 1 of the study, subjects with brain metastases must have been asymptomatic for at least 4 weeks and:
* at least 8 weeks without tumor progression after any whole brain radiotherapy;
* at least 4 weeks since craniotomy and resection or stereotactic radiosurgery;
* at least 3 weeks without new brain metastases as evidenced by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computed tomography (CT).
6. Adequate organ and marrow function, as defined below:
* hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL
* absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1500/mm\^3
* platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3
* total bilirubin within normal ranges unless associated with hepatobiliary metastases or Gilbert syndrome, then total bilirubin ≤ 2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN)
* alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 2.5 × ULN unless associated with hepatic metastases, then ALT and AST ≤ 5 × ULN
* creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
7. Have been informed of other treatment options.
8. Age ≥ 18 years.
9. Able and willing to give valid written informed consent.
10. Able and willing to give valid written consent for archival tumor samples.
11. Able and willing to give valid written consent for biopsy samples (subjects with biopsiable tumors, and if clinically appropriate, in the expansion phase only).
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of severe allergic reactions to any unknown allergens or any components of the study drugs.
3. Active or prior autoimmune disease except for autoimmune thyroiditis or vitiligo.
4. Any prior Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse event (irAE) or any prior corticosteroid-refractory irAE.
5. Known active or chronic viral hepatitis or history of any type of hepatitis within the last 6 months.
6. History of sarcoidosis syndrome.
7. Active or history of inflammatory bowel disease (colitis, Crohn's), diverticulitis, irritable bowel disease, celiac disease, or other serious, chronic, gastrointestinal conditions associated with diarrhea. Active or history of systemic lupus erythematosus or Wegener's granulomatosis.
8. Metastatic disease to the central nervous system for which other therapeutic options, including radiotherapy, may have been available.
9. Known immunodeficiency or active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
10. Other active serious illnesses (e.g., serious infections requiring antibiotics).
11. If a subject previously received investigational treatment, the last dose of investigational treatment was administered within 4 weeks of Day 1 of the study or AE(s) attributable to investigational treatment had not resolved to Grade 1 or better.
12. Major surgical procedure (as defined by the Investigator) within 30 days prior to Day 1 or still recovering from prior surgery.
13. Mental impairment that may have compromised the ability to give informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study.
14. Lack of availability for immunological and clinical follow-up assessments.
15. Women who were breast feeding or pregnant as evidenced by positive serum pregnancy test (minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of human chorionic gonadotropin \[HCG\]).
16. Female subjects of childbearing potential who were sexually active with a non-sterilized male partner must have used at least one highly effective method of contraception from the time of screening and must have agreed to continue using such precautions for 90 days after the last dose of durvalumab or for 6 months after the final dose of durvalumab + tremelimumab (whichever was longer). Non-sterilized male partners of a female subject must have used male condoms plus spermicide throughout this period. Cessation of birth control after this point should have been discussed with a responsible physician. Not engaging in sexual activity for the total duration of the trial and the drug washout period was an acceptable practice; however, periodic abstinence, the rhythm method, and the withdrawal method were not acceptable methods of birth control.
Female subjects should have also refrained from breastfeeding throughout the period described above.
Females of childbearing potential were defined as those who were not surgically sterile (i.e., bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or complete hysterectomy) or post-menopausal.
Females were considered post-menopausal if they had been amenorrheic for 12 months without an alternative medical cause. The following age-specific requirements applied:
* Females \<50 years of age were considered post-menopausal if they had been amenorrheic for 12 months or more following cessation of exogenous hormonal treatments and if they had luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels in the post-menopausal range for the institution or underwent surgical sterilization (bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy).
* Females ≥ 50 years of age were considered post-menopausal if they had been amenorrheic for 12 months or more following cessation of all exogenous hormonal treatments, had radiation-induced menopause with last menses \>1 year ago, had chemotherapy-induced menopause with last menses \>1 year ago, or underwent surgical sterilization (bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral salpingectomy or hysterectomy).
Non-sterilized male subjects who were sexually active with a female partner of childbearing potential must have used male condoms plus spermicide from screening through 90 days after the last dose of durvalumab or through 6 months after receipt of the final dose of durvalumab + tremelimumab (whichever was longer). Female partners (of childbearing potential) of a male subject must have used a highly effective method of contraception throughout this period. Cessation of birth control after this point should have been discussed with a responsible physician. Not engaging in sexual activity for the total duration of the trial and the drug washout period was an acceptable practice; however, periodic abstinence, the rhythm method, and the withdrawal method were not acceptable methods of contraception.
Male subjects should have refrained from sperm donation throughout the period described above.
A highly effective method of contraception was defined as one that resulted in a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly. Note that some contraception methods were not considered highly effective (e.g., male or female condom with or without spermicide; female cap, diaphragm, or sponge with or without spermicide; non-copper containing intrauterine device; progestogen-only oral hormonal contraceptive pills where inhibition of ovulation is not the primary mode of action \[excluding Cerazette/desogestrel which was considered highly effective\]; and triphasic combined oral contraceptive pills).
17. Any condition that, in the clinical judgment of the treating physician, was likely to prevent the subject from complying with any aspect of the protocol or that may have put the subject at unacceptable risk.
18. Subjects must not have donated blood while on study and for at least 90 days following the last durvalumab treatment or 6 months after the last tremelimumab treatment, whichever was longer.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MedImmune LLC
INDUSTRY
Cancer Research Institute, New York City
OTHER
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jedd D Wolchok, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yale Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Virginia Division of Hematology and Oncology
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wolchok JD, Hoos A, O'Day S, Weber JS, Hamid O, Lebbe C, Maio M, Binder M, Bohnsack O, Nichol G, Humphrey R, Hodi FS. Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 1;15(23):7412-20. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1624. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LUD2013-003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.