A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Masked, Clinical Trial of Autologous Serum Eye Drops for Severe Ocular Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) Patients

NCT ID: NCT01972438

Last Updated: 2016-12-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Some eye diseases can be helped by eye drops made from a person's own blood. These eye drops are called autologous serum eye drops, or ASEDs. ASEDs have been studied in only a few people with graft vs. host disease (GVHD) affecting the eye and were found to be helpful with few side effects.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether ASEDs are safe and more effective than control (normal saline) and can help with eye symptoms in people with severe chronic eye GVHD.

Each participant in this study was to have blood drawn to prepare ASEDs specifically for the participant. Each participant was scheduled to receive ASEDs for 3 months and placebo eye drops (salt water) for 3 months. Participants did not know when they were receiving the ASEDs and when they were receiving placebo eye drops.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective:

A common, serious and debilitating long term complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCST) is chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Ocular GVHD develops in up to 85% of patients with chronic GVHD. It is characterized by progressive keratitis sicca and cicatrizing ocular inflammatory surface disease with T cell mediated damage to conjunctival and corneal epithelium and lacrimal tissue. Various medical and surgical treatments have been used, such as various lubricating agents, steroid drops and ointments, cyclosporin drops, punctal plugs or cautery and partial tarsorrhaphy. However, in severe cases, none offer acceptable, long-lasting relief from pain, irritation, dryness and diminished vision associated with ocular GVHD. An alternative treatment that has previously been safely investigated is autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs). The objective of this study was to determine whether ASEDs are more effective than control (normal saline) in the treatment of severe chronic ocular GVHD in HSCT patients unresponsive to standard medical treatment.

Study Population:

Eighteen post-HSCT patients with severe ocular GVHD unresponsive to standard medical treatment were enrolled. Initially, 34 post-HSCT patients with severe ocular GVHD unresponsive to standard medical treatment were to be enrolled. However, only 18 enrolled, as the investigational product (IP) was no longer provided to participants as of June 2015 due to manufacturing issues.

Design:

This was a Phase 2, randomized, double-masked, controlled, crossover, single-center study to investigate ASEDs in participants with severe chronic ocular GVHD. During the initial crossover phase of the study, participants participated in a two-period, six-month, crossover study in which participants were randomized to one of two treatment sequence groups. The two groups were: 1) daily administration of ASEDs for the first three months and then crossover to control (normal saline) eye drops beginning at Month 3 through Month 6, or 2) daily administration of control (normal saline) eye drops for the first three months and then crossover to ASEDs beginning at Month 3 through Month 6. Participants in both groups applied the assigned drops four times per day for six months, as well as maintained their current standard ocular GVHD therapy. Following the initial crossover phase, beginning at the Month 6 visit, participants were provided ASEDs as open-label treatment on an as-needed basis until study completion. As of June 2015, participants were informed to discontinue use of the IP and send it back the NIH Pharmacy. During the first year, required clinic visits occurred at Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 with required telephone follow-up visits at Months 7 and 9. Following the Month 12 visit, participants were evaluated every six months, alternating telephone follow-up visits with clinic visits, until the last enrolled participant reached his/her Month 12 visit. At the discretion of the Investigator, participants who did not complete the Month 12 visit had the most recent study visit constitute as the final safety visit, otherwise the participant was scheduled for a final safety visit within 4 1/2 months. Participants who already surpassed the Month 12 visit were scheduled for a final safety visit within 4 1/2 months.

Outcome Measures:

The primary outcome was the proportion of participants experiencing a ≥ 50% reduction in the combined score of the modified Oxford punctate keratopathy grading and the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Eye Institute (NEI) visual analogue scale in the study eye from baseline to Month 3. A ≥ 50% reduction in the combined score is considered a treatment success. While the design is a crossover study, the primary outcome was assessed after the first period at Month 3. Secondary outcomes included changes in the combined score of the modified Oxford punctate keratopathy grading and the NIH/NEI visual analogue scale in both eyes from baseline to the end of each period, changes in the chronic ocular GVHD Composite Assessment Scale (CAS) score, objective testing, subjective testing and global chronic GVHD assessments in both eyes. Safety outcomes were the number and severity of systemic and ocular toxicities and adverse events. The number of participants withdrawn from the study treatment due to vision loss, adverse events or treatment failure also contributed to the assessment of safety.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Graft vs Host Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Graft Versus Host Disease Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ASEDs - Saline

Participants administer autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs) daily for the first three months, then crossover to administer control (normal saline) eye drops daily beginning at Month 3 through Month 6.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ASEDs

Intervention Type DRUG

Experimental Intervention

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Control Intervention

Saline - ASEDs

Participants administer control (normal saline) eye drops daily for the first three months, then crossover to administer autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs) daily beginning at Month 3 through Month 6.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

ASEDs

Intervention Type DRUG

Experimental Intervention

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Control Intervention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ASEDs

Experimental Intervention

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

Control Intervention

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Participant must be 18 years of age or older.
2. Participant must understand and sign the protocol's informed consent document.
3. Participant must have severe ocular Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) in one (unilateral) or both (bilateral) eyes with the following characteristics in the study eye:

1. Combined score of modified Oxford punctate keratopathy grading and National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Eye Institute (NEI) visual analogue scale of ≥ 4, and
2. Composite assessment scale (CAS) score of ≥ 3, and
3. Schirmer's tear test without anesthesia of ≤ 5 mm, and
4. Not responsive to standard medical treatment for at least three months prior to randomization. Standard medical treatment includes cyclosporine (Restasis®) ophthalmic emulsion (if tolerated), steroid drops (unless contraindicated), lubricating drops and ointments.
4. Participant is enrolled in an NIH study at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) or National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
5. Participant is willing and able to supply an adequate amount of blood to create the autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participant is unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits.
2. Participant is seropositive with positive nucleic acid confirmatory tests for human immunodeficiency virus-1/2 (HIV-1/2), human T lymphotropic virus-I/II (HTLV-I/II), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) without confirmed history of vaccination.
3. Participant has GVHD proliferative keratopathy, uveitis or GVHD retinopathy in either eye.
4. Participant has an active ocular infection in either eye.
5. Participant has an allergy to dilating or anesthetic eye drops.
6. Participant has used Boston Scleral Lens (or similar lenses) in either eye or has used ASEDs in either eye within the past two months. Participants who have used the Boston Scleral Lens (or similar lenses) or ASEDs in either eye who did not respond to treatment and have stopped using them for at least two months are eligible.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Emmes Company, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Eye Institute (NEI)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Manuel B Datiles, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Eye Institute (NEI)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ, Martin P, Chien J, Przepiorka D, Couriel D, Cowen EW, Dinndorf P, Farrell A, Hartzman R, Henslee-Downey J, Jacobsohn D, McDonald G, Mittleman B, Rizzo JD, Robinson M, Schubert M, Schultz K, Shulman H, Turner M, Vogelsang G, Flowers ME. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005 Dec;11(12):945-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.09.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16338616 (View on PubMed)

Yamada C, King KE, Ness PM. Autologous serum eyedrops: literature review and implications for transfusion medicine specialists. Transfusion. 2008 Jun;48(6):1245-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01665.x. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18410252 (View on PubMed)

Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003 Oct;22(7):640-50. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14508260 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13-EI-0206

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

130206

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id