Trial Outcomes & Findings for Self-Weighing Instruction Feasibility Study (NCT NCT01966926)

NCT ID: NCT01966926

Last Updated: 2019-11-01

Results Overview

Participants were assigned to daily or weekly weight tracking, and were asked to return postcards once a week with weights recorded (7 for daily, 1 for weekly).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

30 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 months

Results posted on

2019-11-01

Participant Flow

Participants recruited in Sept-Oct 2009 from craigslist.com ads and flyers in a University of Minnesota office building. 58 contacted the study and 28 were excluded \[did not complete screening (n=10), not eligible due to weight or health exclusions (n=15), or withdrew before consent (n=3)\], resulting in a final sample of 30 participants.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Daily Weight Tracking
daily weighing frequency instructions and tips
Weekly Weight Tracking
weekly weighing frequency instructions and tips
Overall Study
STARTED
15
15
Overall Study
COMPLETED
15
15
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Self-Weighing Instruction Feasibility Study

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Daily Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
daily weighing frequency instructions and tips
Weekly Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
weekly weighing frequency instructions and tips
Total
n=30 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
45.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8 • n=7 Participants
45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants
n=5 Participants
15 participants
n=7 Participants
30 participants
n=5 Participants
Body Mass Index
30.99 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.97 • n=5 Participants
31.08 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.37 • n=7 Participants
31.04 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.12 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: All participants were included in the analysis.

Participants were assigned to daily or weekly weight tracking, and were asked to return postcards once a week with weights recorded (7 for daily, 1 for weekly).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Daily Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
daily weighing frequency instructions and tips
Weekly Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
weekly weighing frequency instructions and tips
Adherence to Weight Tracking Instructions
98.3 percentage of postcards returned
96.7 percentage of postcards returned

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline to 6 months

Ratings of depressed mood, assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory, were obtained at baseline, three, and six months; the comparison of depression scores between groups and over time from baseline to 3 and 6 months was considered as a secondary outcome and analyzed using repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Scores on the inventory range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater presence of depressive symptoms. Scores from 0-10 represent normal mood; 11-16 = mild mood disturbance; 17-20 = borderline clinical depression; 21-30 = moderate depression; 31-40 = severe depression; \> 40 = extreme depression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Daily Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
daily weighing frequency instructions and tips
Weekly Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
weekly weighing frequency instructions and tips
Changes in Depression Ratings
baseline depression
3.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
6.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
Changes in Depression Ratings
3-month depression
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
7.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
Changes in Depression Ratings
6-month depression
4.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6
6.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline to 6 months

Ratings of anxiety, assessed by the Beck Anxiety Inventory, were assessed at baseline, three, and six months; a comparison of anxiety scores between groups and over time from baseline to 3 and 6 months was considered a secondary outcome and analyzed using repeated measures MANOVA. Possible scores on the scale range from 0-63. Scores from 0-7 indicate minimal anxiety; 8-15 = mild anxiety; 16-25 = moderate anxiety; 26-63 = severe anxiety.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Daily Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
daily weighing frequency instructions and tips
Weekly Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
weekly weighing frequency instructions and tips
Changes in Anxiety
baseline anxiety
2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
5.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0
Changes in Anxiety
3-month anxiety
2.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
5.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.5
Changes in Anxiety
6-month anxiety
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.0
5.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline to 6 months

Changes in self-reported body image were assessed at baseline, three, and six months using the Appearance subscale of the Multidimensional Body Image Questionnaire. The subscale has a range of 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating better body image. A comparison of body image scores between groups and over time from baseline to 3 and 6 months was considered a secondary outcome and analyzed using repeated measures MANOVA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Daily Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
daily weighing frequency instructions and tips
Weekly Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
weekly weighing frequency instructions and tips
Changes in Body Image
baseline body image
20.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.0
19.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
Changes in Body Image
3-month body image
22.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
17.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
Changes in Body Image
6-month body image
21.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.9
18.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline to 6 months

Perceived barriers to self-weighing were assessed at baseline, three, and six months using a scale created for this study. The scale has a range of 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater perceptions of barriers to self-weighing. A comparison of barriers scores between groups and over time from baseline to 3 and 6 months was considered a secondary outcome and analyzed using repeated measures MANOVA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Daily Weight Tracking
n=14 Participants
daily weighing frequency instructions and tips
Weekly Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
weekly weighing frequency instructions and tips
Changes in Barriers to Weight Tracking
6-month barriers
30.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.9
34.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.4
Changes in Barriers to Weight Tracking
baseline barriers
39.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
46.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.7
Changes in Barriers to Weight Tracking
3-month barriers
27.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
37.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: three to six months

Perceptions of weight tracking (ease of remembering and understanding, usefulness, awareness, interest, reward value, satisfaction, motivational value) were assessed at three and six months using a scale created for the study. The scale has a range of 0 to 64, with higher scores indicating greater perceptions of favorability of weight tracking. A comparison of perceptions scores between groups and over time from 3 and 6 months was considered a secondary outcome and analyzed using repeated measures MANOVA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Daily Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
daily weighing frequency instructions and tips
Weekly Weight Tracking
n=15 Participants
weekly weighing frequency instructions and tips
Changes in Perceptions of Weight Tracking
3-month perceptions
47.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.6
40.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.2
Changes in Perceptions of Weight Tracking
6-month perceptions
48.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.0
45.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7

Adverse Events

Daily Weight Tracking

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Weekly Weight Tracking

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Jennifer Linde

University of Minnesota

Phone: 612-624-0065

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place