Safety and Efficacy Study for the Field-directed Treatment of Actinic Keratosis (AK) With Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

NCT ID: NCT01966120

Last Updated: 2023-07-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

87 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz) versus placebo in the field-directed treatment of mild to moderate actinic keratosis with photodynamic therapy (PDT) when using the BF-RhodoLED lamp.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study was performed as a randomized, multicentre, double-blind, placebo- controlled, parallel-group, phase III trial with BF-200 ALA and placebo in seven centres in Germany. A total of 94 patients were screened in this study; 87 were randomized (55 patients received BF-200 ALA, 32 received placebo). Patients received one PDT. If residual lesions remained at 3 months after treatment, PDT was repeated. Illumination was performed with the PDT lamp BF-RhodoLED.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Actinic Keratosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BF-200 ALA gel

Photodynamic therapy with BF-RhodoLED in combination with BF-200 ALA.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

BF-200 ALA gel

Intervention Type DRUG

BF-200 ALA was applied over 1-2 fields of approximately 20 cm² in total, allowed to dry for approximately 10 minutes, and covered with occlusive tape material for 3 h.

Photodynamic therapy with BF-RhodoLED

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After cleaning the lesions, the entire treatment field(s) were illuminated using the novel narrow spectrum BF-RhodoLED lamp, a red light illumination source (approximately 635 nm) developed by Biofrontera, until a total light dose of 37 J/cm² (per treated field) was achieved.

Placebo to BF-200 ALA gel

Photodynamic therapy with BF-RhodoLED in combination with a nanoemulsion gel formulation similar to BF-200 ALA, but without the active ingredient 5-aminolevulinic acid.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo to BF-200 ALA gel

Intervention Type DRUG

The reference product was a placebo (a nanoemulsion gel formulation similar to the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), but without the active ingredient). The placebo was packaged, assigned to each patient, and administered in the same way as the IMP.

Photodynamic therapy with BF-RhodoLED

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After cleaning the lesions, the entire treatment field(s) were illuminated using the novel narrow spectrum BF-RhodoLED lamp, a red light illumination source (approximately 635 nm) developed by Biofrontera, until a total light dose of 37 J/cm² (per treated field) was achieved.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BF-200 ALA gel

BF-200 ALA was applied over 1-2 fields of approximately 20 cm² in total, allowed to dry for approximately 10 minutes, and covered with occlusive tape material for 3 h.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to BF-200 ALA gel

The reference product was a placebo (a nanoemulsion gel formulation similar to the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), but without the active ingredient). The placebo was packaged, assigned to each patient, and administered in the same way as the IMP.

Intervention Type DRUG

Photodynamic therapy with BF-RhodoLED

After cleaning the lesions, the entire treatment field(s) were illuminated using the novel narrow spectrum BF-RhodoLED lamp, a red light illumination source (approximately 635 nm) developed by Biofrontera, until a total light dose of 37 J/cm² (per treated field) was achieved.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ameluz PDT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males or females between 18 and 85 years of age (inclusive)
* Presence of 4 to 8 clinically confirmed actinic keratosis (AK) target lesions of mild to moderate intensity within 1-2 fields

Exclusion Criteria

* History of hypersensitivity to 5-ALA or any ingredient of BF-200 ALA
* Current treatment with immunosuppressive therapy
* Presence of other malignant or benign tumors of the skin within the treatment area (eg malignant melanoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)) within the last 4 weeks
* Confirmed diagnosis of SCC for the representative lesion by screening biopsy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Biofrontera Bioscience GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Uwe Reinhold, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dermatologisches Zentrum Bonn

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dermatologisches Zentrum Bonn Friedensplatz

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Reinhold U, Philipp-Dormston WG, Dirschka T, Ostendorf R, Aschoff R, Berking C, Jager A, Schmitz B, Foguet M, Szeimies RM. Long-term follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, phase III, multi-centre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of field-directed photodynamic therapy (PDT) of mild to moderate actinic keratosis using BF-200 ALA versus placebo and the BF-RhodoLED(R) lamp. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Aug;39(8):1449-1459. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20452. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39666443 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-002510-12

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ALA-AK-CT007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.