Trial Outcomes & Findings for 3D Breast Imaging for Cosmetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery (NCT NCT01964105)

NCT ID: NCT01964105

Last Updated: 2017-12-26

Results Overview

BREAST-Q is a validated measures of patient reported outcomes (this is not an acronym). For this study we utilized the preoperative and postoperative BREAST -Q designed to analyze outcomes following breast augmentation The BREAST-Q is measured as a Q-score on a scale of 0-100. 0 is a poor score, 100 is an optimal score. Q-scores stand independently and are not combined to create a total score.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

100 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

up to 6 months postop visit.

Results posted on

2017-12-26

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Standard Preoperative Evaluation
Control Group: Patients will receive standard preoperative evaluation (2D imaging). Goal: 50 patients
Non-Randomized Cohort: 3D Imaging
Patients who refuse the option of randomization but otherwise meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be offered participation in this study as part of a non-randomized cohort. Goal: 50 Patients 3D Imaging
3D Imaging Simulation
Intervention Group: 3D Image Simulation + Standard Preoperative Evaluation Goal: 50 patients 3D Imaging
Overall Study
STARTED
15
75
10
Overall Study
COMPLETED
13
62
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
13
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Standard Preoperative Evaluation
Control Group: Patients will receive standard preoperative evaluation (2D imaging). Goal: 50 patients
Non-Randomized Cohort: 3D Imaging
Patients who refuse the option of randomization but otherwise meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be offered participation in this study as part of a non-randomized cohort. Goal: 50 Patients 3D Imaging
3D Imaging Simulation
Intervention Group: 3D Image Simulation + Standard Preoperative Evaluation Goal: 50 patients 3D Imaging
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
2
13
0

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
3D Imaging Simulation
n=10 Participants
The intervention group underwent computer simulation with the Vectra Sculptor package (Canfield Scientific Inc, Parsippany, NJ) in addition to control group preoperative evaluation.
Standard Preoperative Evaluation
n=13 Participants
The control group underwent tissue-based planning that was supplemented by review of photos obtained from magazines or the internet, and placement of sizers in a surgical bra. Control group patients underwent three-dimensional photography with the same system but were not simulated.
Non-Randomized Cohort: 3D Imaging
n=62 Participants
Since enrollment in the non-randomized arm was predicated upon a pre-existing desire for computer simulation, all of these patients received this intervention.
Total
n=85 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1 • n=10 Participants
40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=13 Participants
35.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=62 Participants
37.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=85 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
10 Participants
n=10 Participants
13 Participants
n=13 Participants
62 Participants
n=62 Participants
85 Participants
n=85 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants
n=10 Participants
13 Participants
n=13 Participants
62 Participants
n=62 Participants
85 Participants
n=85 Participants
Volume of Breast
494.5 cubic centimeters (cc)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 93 • n=10 Participants
503.4 cubic centimeters (cc)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 113.1 • n=13 Participants
420 cubic centimeters (cc)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 119.3 • n=62 Participants
441 cubic centimeters (cc)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 120.5 • n=85 Participants
BREAST-Q
63.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.6 • n=10 Participants
70.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.5 • n=13 Participants
64.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3 • n=62 Participants
64.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1 • n=85 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 6 months postop visit.

BREAST-Q is a validated measures of patient reported outcomes (this is not an acronym). For this study we utilized the preoperative and postoperative BREAST -Q designed to analyze outcomes following breast augmentation The BREAST-Q is measured as a Q-score on a scale of 0-100. 0 is a poor score, 100 is an optimal score. Q-scores stand independently and are not combined to create a total score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Standard Preoperative Evaluation
n=13 Participants
Intervention Group: 3D Image Simulation + Standard Preoperative Evaluation Goal: 50 patients 3D Imaging
3D Imaging Simulation
n=10 Participants
Control Group: Patients will receive standard preoperative evaluation (2D imaging). Goal: 50 patients
Non-Randomized Cohort: 3D Imaging
n=62 Participants
Patients who refuse the option of randomization but otherwise meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be offered participation in this study as part of a non-randomized cohort. Goal: 50 Patients 3D Imaging
Breast Q Augmentation Module
494.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 93
503.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 113.1
420 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 119.3

Adverse Events

Standard Preoperative Evaluation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

3D Imaging Simulation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Non-Randomized Cohort: 3D Imaging

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

TERENCE MICHAEL MYCKATYN, PI, PROFESSOR, PLASTIC SURGERY

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, SAINT LOUIS

Phone: 314-362-4263

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place