Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Phase I- Sequential Cohort Dosing to Determine Maximum Tolerated Dose in Healthy Male Volunteers. (NCT NCT01955564)
NCT ID: NCT01955564
Last Updated: 2017-06-20
Results Overview
Physical examinations were carried out on the following: Lymph nodes, mouth, neck, nervous system, nose, skin and throat.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
54 participants
Day -1(pre-dose) through Day 8 (Discharge)
2017-06-20
Participant Flow
A total of 54 healthy males, who were between the age of 18-45 years old, with a minimum body weight of 45 kg and body mass index of more than or equal to 30, were recruited and observed in the period from 23rd of July 2013 till 19th of September 2014 in this study conducted at a single site in the US.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo, single dose
|
Cohort 1
NW-3509a - 1mg, single dose
|
Cohort 2
NW-3509a 2mg, single dose
|
Cohort 3
NW-3509a 5mg, single dose
|
Cohort 4
NW-3509a 10 mg, single dose
|
Cohort 5
NW-3509a 20 mg, single dose
|
Cohort 6
NW-3509a 30 mg, single dose
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Phase I- Sequential Cohort Dosing to Determine Maximum Tolerated Dose in Healthy Male Volunteers.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
placebo: single dose
|
Cohort 1
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a - 1mg
NW-3509a: single dose
|
Cohort 2
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 2mg
NW-3509a: single dose
|
Cohort 3
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 5mg
NW-3509a: single dose
|
Cohort 4
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 10 mg
NW-3509a: single dose
|
Cohort 5
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 20 mg
NW-3509a: single dose
|
Cohort 6
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 30 mg NW-3509a: single dose
|
Total
n=54 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
18-45
|
31.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.71 • n=5 Participants
|
28.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.31 • n=7 Participants
|
23.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.91 • n=5 Participants
|
30.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.12 • n=4 Participants
|
34.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.85 • n=21 Participants
|
29.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.51 • n=8 Participants
|
24.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.56 • n=8 Participants
|
28.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.88 • n=24 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 participants
n=8 Participants
|
8 participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 participants
n=8 Participants
|
25 participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 participants
n=8 Participants
|
5 participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 participants
n=8 Participants
|
3 participants
n=8 Participants
|
15 participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 participants
n=21 Participants
|
6 participants
n=8 Participants
|
6 participants
n=8 Participants
|
54 participants
n=24 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day -1(pre-dose) through Day 8 (Discharge)Physical examinations were carried out on the following: Lymph nodes, mouth, neck, nervous system, nose, skin and throat.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo, single dose
|
Cohort 1
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a - 1mg, single dose
|
Cohort 2
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 2mg, single dose
|
Cohort 3
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 5mg, single dose
|
Cohort 4
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 10 mg, single dose
|
Cohort 5
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 20 mg, single dose
|
Cohort 6
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 30 mg, single dose
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Physical Examination Shift Table
|
1 Participants abnormal at end of study
|
1 Participants abnormal at end of study
|
0 Participants abnormal at end of study
|
0 Participants abnormal at end of study
|
1 Participants abnormal at end of study
|
1 Participants abnormal at end of study
|
0 Participants abnormal at end of study
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to 32 hours post-dosePlasma concentration data, derived PK parameters, and urine data are summarized as maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). The plasma concentrations of NW-3509A in the samples taken from the subjects receiving placebo were below the limit of quantification (\<1.00 ng/mL) in all cases (n=18).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo, single dose
|
Cohort 1
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a - 1mg, single dose
|
Cohort 2
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 2mg, single dose
|
Cohort 3
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 5mg, single dose
|
Cohort 4
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 10 mg, single dose
|
Cohort 5
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 20 mg, single dose
|
Cohort 6
NW-3509a 30 mg, single dose
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Plasma Concentration of NW-3509A at Doses Tested
|
2.08 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
3.49 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.98
|
14.2 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
22.5 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16.4
|
36.4 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 30.1
|
93.3 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 18.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to 32 hours post-dosePlasma concentration data, derived PK parameters, and urine data were summarized as total drug exposure over time (AUC0-t). The plasma concentrations of NW-3509A in the samples taken from the subjects receiving placebo were below the limit of quantification (\<1.00 ng/mL) in all cases (n=18).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo, single dose
|
Cohort 1
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a - 1mg, single dose
|
Cohort 2
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 2mg, single dose
|
Cohort 3
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 5mg, single dose
|
Cohort 4
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 10 mg, single dose
|
Cohort 5
n=6 Participants
NW-3509a 20 mg, single dose
|
Cohort 6
NW-3509a 30 mg, single dose
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Drug Exposure Over Time (AUC0-t) of NW-3509A at Doses Tested
|
6.71 ng.h/mL
Standard Deviation 9.24
|
13.4 ng.h/mL
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
56.7 ng.h/mL
Standard Deviation 30.5
|
101 ng.h/mL
Standard Deviation 86
|
166 ng.h/mL
Standard Deviation 175
|
350 ng.h/mL
Standard Deviation 34
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Cohort 1
Cohort 2
Cohort 3
Cohort 4
Cohort 5
Cohort 6
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 participants at risk
placebo, single dose
|
Cohort 1
n=6 participants at risk
NW-3509a 1mg, single dose
|
Cohort 2
n=6 participants at risk
NW-3509a 2mg, single dose
|
Cohort 3
n=6 participants at risk
NW-3509a 5mg, single dose
|
Cohort 4
n=6 participants at risk
NW-3509a 10 mg, single dose
|
Cohort 5
n=6 participants at risk
NW-3509a 20 mg, single dose
|
Cohort 6
n=6 participants at risk
NW-3509a 30 mg, single dose
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Postural Orthostatic and tachycardia syndrome
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling hot
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Confusion
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Excoriation
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Thermal burn
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphate kinase
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Coordination abnormal
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
General disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
General disorders
Somnolence
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash Papular
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse Event evaluations were performed during the screening period, at baseline, Day 2 and Day 8. In addition, all subjects were followed up for 30 days after their dose of study medication for the occurrence of any SAEs
Systematic assessment by standard questionnaires, regular investigator assessment, and regular laboratory testing at each visit.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place