Trial Outcomes & Findings for A New Paradigm for Illness Monitoring and Relapse Prevention in Schizophrenia (NCT NCT01952041)
NCT ID: NCT01952041
Last Updated: 2019-06-21
Results Overview
A count of participants who experienced relapse, as defined as one of the following events: psychiatric hospitalization, a significant increase in the level of psychiatric care (i.e. frequency and intensity of services), an increase in medication in addition to a 25% increase in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) from last assessment, suicidal or homicidal ideation that was clinically significant in the investigator's judgement, deliberate self-injury, violent behavior resulting in damage to another person or property.
COMPLETED
NA
149 participants
1 year
2019-06-21
Participant Flow
Eligible individuals at a medical clinic were identified through electronic medical records and approached by a staff member to be recruited for the study. Recruitment was open from March 2015 until July 2016.
N=23 participants withdrew before randomization: N=1 did not complete baseline, N=15 no longer receiving services at the study site, N=1 incarcerated, N=6 no longer interested in participating.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Device: Smartphone
Participants in the smartphone intervention arm received treatment as usual in addition to receiving a smartphone with the study application. The study application identified relapse risk and prompted the clinical team to provide enhanced services.
|
Treatment as Usual
Treatment as usual included outpatient case management, linkage to services and medication monitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
62
|
64
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
45
|
43
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
17
|
21
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Device: Smartphone
Participants in the smartphone intervention arm received treatment as usual in addition to receiving a smartphone with the study application. The study application identified relapse risk and prompted the clinical team to provide enhanced services.
|
Treatment as Usual
Treatment as usual included outpatient case management, linkage to services and medication monitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
9
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
7
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A New Paradigm for Illness Monitoring and Relapse Prevention in Schizophrenia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Device: Smartphone
n=62 Participants
Participants in the smartphone intervention arm received treatment as usual in addition to receiving a smartphone with the study application. The study application identified relapse risk and prompted the clinical team to provide enhanced services.
|
Treatment as Usual
n=64 Participants
Treatment as usual included outpatient case management, linkage to services and medication monitoring.
|
Total
n=126 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 • n=5 Participants
|
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=7 Participants
|
37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearA count of participants who experienced relapse, as defined as one of the following events: psychiatric hospitalization, a significant increase in the level of psychiatric care (i.e. frequency and intensity of services), an increase in medication in addition to a 25% increase in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) from last assessment, suicidal or homicidal ideation that was clinically significant in the investigator's judgement, deliberate self-injury, violent behavior resulting in damage to another person or property.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Device: Smartphone
n=62 Participants
Participants in the smartphone intervention arm received treatment as usual in addition to receiving a smartphone with the study application. The study application identified relapse risk and prompted the clinical team to provide enhanced services.
|
Treatment as Usual
n=64 Participants
Treatment as usual included outpatient case management, linkage to services and medication monitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Relapses in Participants
|
20 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization date until first relapse (evaluated approximately every 3 months until their last study visit which occurred approximately 12 months from randomization for those who completed the study).Time to first relapse was defined as the time from randomization until the first relapse. Participants who did not experience a relapse were censored at their last known time relapse-free. Time-to-first relapse was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Device: Smartphone
n=62 Participants
Participants in the smartphone intervention arm received treatment as usual in addition to receiving a smartphone with the study application. The study application identified relapse risk and prompted the clinical team to provide enhanced services.
|
Treatment as Usual
n=64 Participants
Treatment as usual included outpatient case management, linkage to services and medication monitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Relapse
|
13.8 months
Not enough participants relapsed to calculate the upper and lower 95% confidence interval (CI).
|
NA months
Interval 9.7 to
In the treatment as usual group (TAU), the median from the time-to-event analysis was not reached (that is, at least 50% of people did not relapse). Not enough participants relapsed to calculate the upper 95% confidence interval (CI).
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and every three months for one year.Psychotic symptom severity assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). This is an 18-item scale that rates severity of positive symptoms (including auditory hallucinations and persecutory ideation), and mood and behavioral symptoms. Items are rated by a clinical assessor on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (very severe). Total scores range from 18-126. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Device: Smartphone
n=62 Participants
Participants in the smartphone intervention arm received treatment as usual in addition to receiving a smartphone with the study application. The study application identified relapse risk and prompted the clinical team to provide enhanced services.
|
Treatment as Usual
n=64 Participants
Treatment as usual included outpatient case management, linkage to services and medication monitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Psychotic Symptom Severity
baseline
|
26.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
27.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
|
|
Psychotic Symptom Severity
3 months
|
24.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
|
25.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
|
Psychotic Symptom Severity
6 months
|
25.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
23.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
|
Psychotic Symptom Severity
9 months
|
25.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
|
24.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6
|
|
Psychotic Symptom Severity
12 months
|
25.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
26.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and every three months for one year.Depression measured using the Calgary Depression Scales (CDSS). This is a 9-item assessment with values of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) of depressive symptoms separate from positive, negative and extrapyramidal symptoms in people with schizophrenia. Total scores range from 0-27. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Device: Smartphone
n=62 Participants
Participants in the smartphone intervention arm received treatment as usual in addition to receiving a smartphone with the study application. The study application identified relapse risk and prompted the clinical team to provide enhanced services.
|
Treatment as Usual
n=64 Participants
Treatment as usual included outpatient case management, linkage to services and medication monitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Depression
baseline
|
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
|
Depression
3 months
|
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Depression
6 months
|
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
|
Depression
9 months
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
|
Depression
12 months
|
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and every three months for one year.Social Functioning was assessed using the Social Functioning Scale (SFS). This is a 76-item questionnaire that assesses various aspects of social functioning and generates a number of subscale scores including social withdrawal, interpersonal behavior, pro-social activities, and an overall score of social functioning. The item values range from 0 (almost never) to 3 (often). Total scores range from 0-228. A higher score indicates greater social functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Device: Smartphone
n=62 Participants
Participants in the smartphone intervention arm received treatment as usual in addition to receiving a smartphone with the study application. The study application identified relapse risk and prompted the clinical team to provide enhanced services.
|
Treatment as Usual
n=64 Participants
Treatment as usual included outpatient case management, linkage to services and medication monitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Social Functioning
baseline
|
142.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.0
|
135.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.2
|
|
Social Functioning
3 months
|
144.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.3
|
140.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.2
|
|
Social Functioning
6 months
|
145.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.2
|
140.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.1
|
|
Social Functioning
9 months
|
134.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.5
|
143.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.0
|
|
Social Functioning
12 months
|
138.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.9
|
141.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.1
|
Adverse Events
Device: Smartphone
Treatment as Usual
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dror Ben-Zeev, PhD
University of Washington School of Medicine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place