Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
468 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2014-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Multi-center Study to Evaluate Performance of an Automated Device for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy
NCT02963441
Long Term Follow-Up of Diabetic Retinopathy
NCT00001395
Rapid, Non-invasive, Regional Functional Imaging of the Retina. (Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis Device)
NCT01546766
Diabetic Retinopathy and Visual Function Study
NCT00001346
Validation Study of RETINA-AI Galaxy™, an Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Device
NCT04774822
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Half of all people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy will be blind within five years. With proven laser and intravitreal drug therapy this risk is reduced to less than 5%, a ten-fold decrease in risk. One third of all people with diabetic macular edema will suffer moderate visual loss in three years. With proven therapy this risk is reduced to less than 10%, a three-fold decrease in risk. Nonetheless, diabetic retinopathy remains the leading cause of preventable blindness in working age Americans.
Excellent diabetes control prevents or significantly reduces the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy but this approach requires difficult lifestyle changes. Therefore, timely identification of patients at risk for blindness, and assuring they receive proven care, are essential to eliminate blindness from diabetic retinopathy. Unfortunately, despite decades of public health awareness campaigns and programs, only 56.9% of US patients with diabetes received universally recommended eye evaluations in 2011.
One reason for this failure is the complexity of existing methods for diabetic retinopathy testing. To be effective, accurate testing should be available in the primary care physician's office since the need for an additional visit to an ophthalmologist is another reason universal testing has failed. To succeed in the primary care physician's office, existing personnel, with minimal training, must be able to accurately and easily test patients. The testing method must take little time and require no additional space since efficient time and space utilization are critical in primary care settings. It must meet quality measures used by Medicare and other payors to award financial incentives. Finally, it must be reimbursed at a favorable level.
RETeval is LKC Technologies' new, handheld, non-invasive, device that measures full-field electroretinogram (ERG) cone b-wave photopic flicker implicit times quickly and easily in a primary care setting. RETeval is simple to use and takes less than five minutes for most patients. It is a handheld device that requires no additional space. Based on published literature, the implicit time is significantly delayed in eyes with severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) relative to eyes with milder forms of DR. These findings suggest that the photopic ERG implicit time can be a good indicator for the objective evaluation of the severity of DR ranging from mild NPDR to PDR.
This study will measure the accuracy of the RETeval device. ETDRS 7-field, dilated, stereo, color fundus photography, read according to the ETDRS protocol, will be used as the gold standard. Cone b-wave photopic flicker implicit time, measured by the RETeval device, and ETDRS photography, will be performed during a single visit. A random sample of the results, the calibration set, will be used to calibrate the referral threshold for the RETeval device. The remaining results, the validation set, will be used as an independent validation to assess accuracy. If RETeval is accurate, and is accepted as a quality measure meeting performance standards, it will be an ideal method to test for retinopathy in patients with diabetes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RETeval
RETeval is a new handheld device intended to detect vision threatening diabetic retinopathy by measuring the response of the retina to a flash of light.
RETeval
RETeval is a new handheld device intended to detect vision threatening diabetic retinopathy by measuring the response of the retina to a flash of light.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
RETeval
RETeval is a new handheld device intended to detect vision threatening diabetic retinopathy by measuring the response of the retina to a flash of light.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Eighteen years or older
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous laser or drug treatment for diabetic retinopathy or macular edema
* Eye diseases other than diabetic retinopathy or macular edema that, in the opinion of the recruiting ophthalmologist, may affect the electroretinogram or result in ungradable Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Protocol images.
* Inability or unwillingness of the subject or legal guardian/representative to give written informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
LKC Technologies, Inc.
INDUSTRY
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Inoveon Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephen R Fransen, MD
Chief Medical Officer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen R Fransen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Inoveon Corporation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Atlanta VA Medical Center
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Oklahoma City VA Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3032
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.