Trial Outcomes & Findings for 16w Interventional Study on Titration and Dose/Efficacy Assessment of Exelon in Chinese Alzheimer's Disease Patients (NCT NCT01948791)
NCT ID: NCT01948791
Last Updated: 2017-02-13
Results Overview
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) was used to measure change in cognitive function. Alzheimer's disease assessment scale (ADAS) is a scale to measure specific cognitive and behavior disorders in Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. The Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) provides a total score range 0-70, and consists of 11 items with lower score indicating lighter impairment and higher total scores indicating more impairment. A negative change score indicates improvement from baseline. Two-sided 95% CI of the difference in the means between baseline and post-baseline values were calculated.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
222 participants
Baseline, Week 16
2017-02-13
Participant Flow
222 patients were screened/enrolled to this study but 41 did not receive study drug.
The Intention analysis set consists of 165 patients who received at least 1 treatment \& had at least 1 assessment on primary efficacy variables.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ENA713
Patients had a dose escalation from 3mg/d to 12mg/d to reach individual tolerated dosage during the titration period of 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
222
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
151
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
71
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
ENA713
Patients had a dose escalation from 3mg/d to 12mg/d to reach individual tolerated dosage during the titration period of 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Management issues
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Others
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Screening failure
|
35
|
Baseline Characteristics
16w Interventional Study on Titration and Dose/Efficacy Assessment of Exelon in Chinese Alzheimer's Disease Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ENA713
n=165 Participants
Patients had a dose escalation from 3mg/d to 12mg/d to reach individual tolerated dosage during the titration period of 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
69.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Female
|
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Male
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: The Per Protocol (PP) population included all patients who had been enrolled to receive treatment, and who had received at least 1 dose of study drug, had 1 baseline assessment \& at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for primary efficacy variable within the Week 16 visit window, and had no major protocol violations.
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) was used to measure change in cognitive function. Alzheimer's disease assessment scale (ADAS) is a scale to measure specific cognitive and behavior disorders in Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. The Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) provides a total score range 0-70, and consists of 11 items with lower score indicating lighter impairment and higher total scores indicating more impairment. A negative change score indicates improvement from baseline. Two-sided 95% CI of the difference in the means between baseline and post-baseline values were calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ENA713
n=151 Participants
Patients had a dose escalation from 3mg/d to 12mg/d to reach individual tolerated dosage during the titration period of 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog)
|
-2.0 units on a scale
Interval -3.0 to 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: The Per Protocol (PP) population included all patients who had been enrolled to receive treatment, had received at least 1 dose of study drug, had 1 baseline assessment \& at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for primary efficacy variable within the Week 16 visit window \& had no major protocol violations.
ADCS-ADL is a scale based on caregiver's assessment of patient's activities of daily life. It is used in clinical studies on dementia \& consists of 23 items and is designed to assess patient's basic \& instrumental activities of daily life, such as the abilities necessary for personal care, communicating \& interacting with other people, maintaining a household, conducting hobbies \& interests, \& making judgments \& decisions. Response to each item is obtained by interview with the caregiver. The basic activities of daily life domain includes mandatory options for best response, or "yes" or "no" questions with separate sub-questions. Higher score \& more "yes" answers indicate better level of self-care of patient. Therefore the higher the total score is, the better the patient's functions. The total score is the sum of the scores of all the items \& sub-questions,\& ranges from 0 to 78. Two-sided 95% CI of the difference in the means between baseline and post-baseline values were calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ENA713
n=151 Participants
Patients had a dose escalation from 3mg/d to 12mg/d to reach individual tolerated dosage during the titration period of 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score
|
0.9 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to 2.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: The Per Protocol (PP) population included all patients who had been enrolled to receive treatment, had received at least 1 dose of study drug, had 1 baseline assessment \& at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for primary efficacy variable within the Week 16 visit window \& had no major protocol violations.
MMSE was used to determine patient's eligibility to participate, is an easy \& practical screening test to identify cognitive disorders. Test consists of 2 parts: language (time orientation, registration \& attention) \& performance (recall, response to written/verbal commands, writing ability \& reproduction of complex polygons); total score range: 0-30; higher score = better function. Positive change score = improvement from baseline. To meet eligibility criteria, patient's MMSE total score at screening had to be 10-26 (inclusive). Interpretation of MMSE by 4 methods: Single Cut0ff: \<24=abnormal; Range: \<21=Increased odds of dementia; \>25=Decreased odds of dementia; Education: 21- abnormal for 8th grade education, \<23=abnormal for high school education, \<24=abnormal for college education; Severity: 24-30=no cognitive impairment, 18-23=mild cognitive impairment, 0-17=severe cognitive impairment. 2-sided 95% CI of difference in means between baseline \& post-baseline values were calculated
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ENA713
n=151 Participants
Patients had a dose escalation from 3mg/d to 12mg/d to reach individual tolerated dosage during the titration period of 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
|
0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: The Per Protocol (PP) population included all patients who had been enrolled to receive treatment, had received at least 1 dose of study drug, had 1 baseline assessment \& at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for primary efficacy variable within the Week 16 visit window \& had no major protocol violations.
This scale assesses a larger scope of the behavior problems/disorders experienced in dementia patients, and identifies the frequency \& severity of the behavior disorders, \& allows rapid assessment using screening questions. 10 questions in behavior domain \& 2 in autonomic nervous system domain were assessed by the investigator interviewing with the caregiver. The NPI-12 total score is the total score of the 12 items, among which the score for each domain is the product of frequency (range: 1-4 points) and severity (range: 1-3 points). The highest score for each domain is 12 points and all the domains have the same weight. Therefore the range of NPI-12 total score is 0-144 points. The NPI-10 total score is the total score of the first 10 items 0-120, which constitute the original form of this scale. A higher NPI total score indicates more severe behavior disorder. Two-sided 95% CI of the difference in the means between baseline and post-baseline values were calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ENA713
n=151 Participants
Patients had a dose escalation from 3mg/d to 12mg/d to reach individual tolerated dosage during the titration period of 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Score
NPI-10
|
-3.6 units on a scale
Interval -5.3 to -1.9
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Score
NPI-12
|
-4.0 units on a scale
Interval -6.2 to -1.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: The Per Protocol (PP) population included all patients who had been enrolled to receive treatment, had received at least 1 dose of study drug, had 1 baseline assessment \& at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for primary efficacy variable within the Week 16 visit window \& had no major protocol violations.
CBI, formulated by Novak and Guest in 1989, is a relatively complete and effective scale to measure caregiver burden that has been extensively adopted internationally. CBI has a total of 24 items in 5 domains, i.e., time dependency items (items 1-5), development items (items 6-10), physical health items (items 11-14), social relations items (items 15-18), and emotional heath items (items 19-24). Each item is scored on a 5-point scale based on the intensity of burden (0-4 points), so that the total score is 0-96, a higher score indicating heavier burden. It is a self-administered scale that takes about 10-15 minutes to complete. Two-sided 95% CI of the difference in the means between baseline and post-baseline values were calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ENA713
n=151 Participants
Patients had a dose escalation from 3mg/d to 12mg/d to reach individual tolerated dosage during the titration period of 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) Score
|
-1.4 units on a scale
Interval -3.1 to 0.4
|
Adverse Events
ENA713
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ENA713
n=181 participants at risk
Patients had a dose escalation from 3mg/d to 12mg/d to reach individual tolerated dosage during the titration period of 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Brain contusion
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Patella fracture
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pneumocephalus
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pulmonary contusion
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skull fractured base
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Soft tissue injury
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subcutaneous haematoma
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain injury
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine prolapse
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Venous thrombosis limb
|
0.55%
1/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ENA713
n=181 participants at risk
Patients had a dose escalation from 3mg/d to 12mg/d to reach individual tolerated dosage during the titration period of 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
5.0%
9/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
7.2%
13/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
20.4%
37/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
16.6%
30/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
7.7%
14/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
7.2%
13/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.3%
6/181
The safety set consists of 181 patients who received at least one drug treatment and had post-baseline safety assessments.
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER