Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clearblue Advanced Fertility Monitor Consumer One Cycle at Home Study (NCT NCT01948258)
NCT ID: NCT01948258
Last Updated: 2018-11-02
Results Overview
Acceptance criteria is that ≥80% of volunteers will score 3 or less on the Likert scale in a home setting by demonstrating ease of use and comprehension of the instructions for use.
COMPLETED
NA
395 participants
one month use
2018-11-02
Participant Flow
This study was conducted by volunteers remotely and managed by the clinical department at SPD. For the study, 395 females aged between 18-45 years were recruited via internet advertising and from women who had participated in previous SPD studies. The first volunteer was recruited on 1st March 2013, the last was recruited on 1st August 2013.
Volunteers were instructed to test for pregnancy prior to starting the study. If pregnant before the start of their cycle they were withdrawn and classified as a pre-study pregnancy. Volunteers were also withdrawn if identified as health care professionals.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Fertility Monitor
Use of Clearblue Advanced Fertility Monitor
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
395
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
233
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
162
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Fertility Monitor
Use of Clearblue Advanced Fertility Monitor
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
41
|
|
Overall Study
Did not complete by cut-off date
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by SPD
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Health Care Professional
|
43
|
|
Overall Study
Removed from statistical analysis
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clearblue Advanced Fertility Monitor Consumer One Cycle at Home Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Fertility Monitor
n=233 Participants
Use of Clearblue Fertility Monitor
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Age of Participants · 18-25
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age of Participants · 26-30
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age of Participants · 31-35
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age of Participants · 36-40
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age of Participants · 41-45
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
233 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : Bangladeshi
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : Chinese
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : Indian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : Pakistani
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : South Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : Other Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Black: African
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Black: Caribbean
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Black: Other Black
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: Australian/New Zealander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: Eastern European
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: Mediterranean/Middle Eastern
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: Western European
|
210 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: Other White
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Mixed
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest qualification
Post-graduate qualifications
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest qualification
Degree or equivalent (college degree)
|
77 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest qualification
Other higher education below degree level (associa
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest qualification
A levels, vocational level 3 and equivalents (age
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest qualification
GCSE (Grade A*-C), vocational level 2 and equivale
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest qualification
Qualifications at level 1 and below
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest qualification
Other qualifications
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest qualification
No qualifications
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Managerial
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Professional
|
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Associate Professional / Technical
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Administrative / Secretarial
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Skilled Trade
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Personal Services
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Sales / Customer Services
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Manufacturing / Driver
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Support Personnel
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Student
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Homemaker
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Occupation
Other
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: one month usePopulation: Volunteers whose data contributes to the full analysis set.
Acceptance criteria is that ≥80% of volunteers will score 3 or less on the Likert scale in a home setting by demonstrating ease of use and comprehension of the instructions for use.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fertility Monitor
n=233 Participants
Use of Clearblue Fertility Monitor
|
|---|---|
|
The Ability of the Volunteer to Use the New Clearblue Advanced Fertility Monitoring a Home Setting
|
89.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: one monthPopulation: Volunteers who completed the study, who had daily diary entries and monitor download data for days on which a test was conducted
To demonstrate correct user identification of fertility status and test days and to determine the performance of the monitor in consumer hands.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fertility Monitor
n=228 Participants
Use of Clearblue Fertility Monitor
|
|---|---|
|
Correct Identification of Monitor Status
|
91.2 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: one monthPopulation: Volunteers who completed the study, comparison of Clearblue Fertility Monitor pregnancy test results and a marketed pregnancy test. Results for all tests conducted.
Pregnancy test results will also be compared with both the performance of a currently marketed pregnancy test when used by a trained technician and quantitative hCG concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fertility Monitor
n=329 Participants
Use of Clearblue Fertility Monitor
|
|---|---|
|
Pregnancy Test Result
Monitor test result in agreement with predicate
|
99.3 percentage of tests in agreement
Interval 97.6 to 99.9
|
|
Pregnancy Test Result
Monitor test result in agreement with hCG levels
|
100 percentage of tests in agreement
Interval 98.8 to 100.0
|
Adverse Events
Fertility Monitor
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr Sarah Johnson, Head of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs
SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics GmbH/SPD Development Company Ltd
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place