Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clearblue Advanced Fertility Monitor Consumer One Cycle at Home Study (NCT NCT01948258)

NCT ID: NCT01948258

Last Updated: 2018-11-02

Results Overview

Acceptance criteria is that ≥80% of volunteers will score 3 or less on the Likert scale in a home setting by demonstrating ease of use and comprehension of the instructions for use.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

395 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

one month use

Results posted on

2018-11-02

Participant Flow

This study was conducted by volunteers remotely and managed by the clinical department at SPD. For the study, 395 females aged between 18-45 years were recruited via internet advertising and from women who had participated in previous SPD studies. The first volunteer was recruited on 1st March 2013, the last was recruited on 1st August 2013.

Volunteers were instructed to test for pregnancy prior to starting the study. If pregnant before the start of their cycle they were withdrawn and classified as a pre-study pregnancy. Volunteers were also withdrawn if identified as health care professionals.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Fertility Monitor
Use of Clearblue Advanced Fertility Monitor
Overall Study
STARTED
395
Overall Study
COMPLETED
233
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
162

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Fertility Monitor
Use of Clearblue Advanced Fertility Monitor
Overall Study
Pregnancy
41
Overall Study
Did not complete by cut-off date
35
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
27
Overall Study
Withdrawal by SPD
8
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
6
Overall Study
Health Care Professional
43
Overall Study
Removed from statistical analysis
2

Baseline Characteristics

Clearblue Advanced Fertility Monitor Consumer One Cycle at Home Study

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Fertility Monitor
n=233 Participants
Use of Clearblue Fertility Monitor
Age, Customized
Age of Participants · 18-25
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
Age of Participants · 26-30
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
Age of Participants · 31-35
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
Age of Participants · 36-40
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
Age of Participants · 41-45
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
233 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : Bangladeshi
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : Chinese
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : Indian
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : Pakistani
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : South Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian : Other Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Black: African
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Black: Caribbean
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Black: Other Black
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: American
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: Australian/New Zealander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: Eastern European
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: Mediterranean/Middle Eastern
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: Western European
210 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · White: Other White
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Mixed
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Highest qualification
Post-graduate qualifications
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
Highest qualification
Degree or equivalent (college degree)
77 Participants
n=5 Participants
Highest qualification
Other higher education below degree level (associa
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Highest qualification
A levels, vocational level 3 and equivalents (age
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
Highest qualification
GCSE (Grade A*-C), vocational level 2 and equivale
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Highest qualification
Qualifications at level 1 and below
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Highest qualification
Other qualifications
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Highest qualification
No qualifications
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Managerial
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Professional
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Associate Professional / Technical
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Administrative / Secretarial
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Skilled Trade
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Personal Services
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Sales / Customer Services
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Manufacturing / Driver
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Support Personnel
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Student
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Homemaker
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occupation
Other
12 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: one month use

Population: Volunteers whose data contributes to the full analysis set.

Acceptance criteria is that ≥80% of volunteers will score 3 or less on the Likert scale in a home setting by demonstrating ease of use and comprehension of the instructions for use.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fertility Monitor
n=233 Participants
Use of Clearblue Fertility Monitor
The Ability of the Volunteer to Use the New Clearblue Advanced Fertility Monitoring a Home Setting
89.7 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: one month

Population: Volunteers who completed the study, who had daily diary entries and monitor download data for days on which a test was conducted

To demonstrate correct user identification of fertility status and test days and to determine the performance of the monitor in consumer hands.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fertility Monitor
n=228 Participants
Use of Clearblue Fertility Monitor
Correct Identification of Monitor Status
91.2 percentage of participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: one month

Population: Volunteers who completed the study, comparison of Clearblue Fertility Monitor pregnancy test results and a marketed pregnancy test. Results for all tests conducted.

Pregnancy test results will also be compared with both the performance of a currently marketed pregnancy test when used by a trained technician and quantitative hCG concentration.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fertility Monitor
n=329 Participants
Use of Clearblue Fertility Monitor
Pregnancy Test Result
Monitor test result in agreement with predicate
99.3 percentage of tests in agreement
Interval 97.6 to 99.9
Pregnancy Test Result
Monitor test result in agreement with hCG levels
100 percentage of tests in agreement
Interval 98.8 to 100.0

Adverse Events

Fertility Monitor

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr Sarah Johnson, Head of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs

SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics GmbH/SPD Development Company Ltd

Phone: 01234835486

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place