Influenza Diagnosis, Treatment and Surveillance With Xpert Flu
NCT ID: NCT01947049
Last Updated: 2017-09-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2011 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-07-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Evaluate the clinical performance of a newly available highly-sensitive rapid influenza test, Xpert Flu.
2. Derive and validate an adult clinical decision guideline to guide clinical testing of influenza patients who meed CDC criteria for antiviral treatment.
3. Evaluate impact of rapid influenza testing for antiviral treatment.
4. Determine cost effectiveness of influenza testing and treatment strategies.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Consenting subjects will have a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab collected for both Xpert Flu testing and gold standard reverse transcription-PCR (rt-PCR) testing under a research protocol. The investigators will compare the test results from the rapid flu testing to that of the gold standard rt-PCR testing in order to assess the clinical performance characteristics of the new rapid test (Objective 1). The investigators will also collect demographics and medical historical information using a brief structured data form, which will be used in combination with rt-PCR test results to derive and validate a clinical decision guideline (Objective 2).
The investigators will simultaneously randomize 2 of the 4 hospitals to the Rapid Testing Group (which will have systematic rapid flu testing performed with results provided to the clinicians), or the Control Group (which will follow standard of care practice with testing left to the discretion of individual clinicians). This will permit comparison of rates of ED antiviral administration or prescription between the two groups to assess the clinical impact of influenza testing (Objective 3). Finally, cost data from the ED visits and subsequent hospitalization will be collected from subjects in both the rapid testing group and the control group to inform a cost-utility analysis of rapid influenza testing compared to current standard of care (Objective 4).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Arm
Participants in this arm will receive usual care (influenza testing and treatment)
No interventions assigned to this group
Rapid Testing
Participants in this arm will receive rapid influenza testing with Xpert Flu.
Rapid Influenza Testing with Xpert Flu
Participants with recieve rapid influenza testing with Xpert Flu
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rapid Influenza Testing with Xpert Flu
Participants with recieve rapid influenza testing with Xpert Flu
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute respiratory tract infection, i.e. in the past two days the subject has experienced any of the following symptoms: new or increased cough, new or increased shortness of breath, change in sputum production (for adults 65 years or older), new sinus pain, new nasal congestion/rhinorrhea, new sore throat, new fever, triage temperature greater than or equal to 38F
* CDC Criteria for influenza antiviral treatment, i.e. is the subject at risk for influenza complications or does the subject have potential current influenza complications including: 65 years old or older, pregnant (or less than 2 weeks post-partum), American Indian or Alaska Native, morbid obesity (BMI greater than 40), current resident of a chronic care facility, chronic pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease (except isolated hypertension), renal disease, hepatic disease, hematologic disease, metabolic disease, neurologic disease, immunosupression due to \[HIV or AIDS, transplant, chemotherapy, medications, other - specify\]. OR does the subject have potential current influenza complications such as: admitted to the hospital or a diagnosis of pneumonia.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to provide consent
* Lack of follow up information (i.e. working telephone number)
* Have an influenza diagnosis in the past 2 weeks (i.e. either given antivirals or had a confirmatory influenza test)
* Previously enrolled in this study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Department of Health and Human Services
FED
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rich Rothman
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrea Dugas, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Richard Rothman, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maricopa Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Olive View - UCLA Medical Center
Sylmar, California, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Truman Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dugas AF, Hsieh YH, LoVecchio F, Moran GJ, Steele MT, Talan DA, Rothman RE; Emergency Department National Influenza Network Investigators. Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Decision Guideline for Influenza Testing in 4 US Emergency Departments. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 1;70(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz171.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6 IDSEP130014-01-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id