A Study of Apalutamide (ARN-509) in Men With Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01946204

Last Updated: 2025-11-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1207 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-14

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apalutamide in adult men with high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This Phase 3 clinical trial is an essential step in the evaluation of an investigational medication to see if it may be useful in treating prostate cancer. The purpose of the SPARTAN study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the investigational medication to placebo in delaying prostate cancer from spreading to other parts of the body. A placebo is a pill that looks like the investigational medication but does not contain any active medication, a dummy pill.

Phase 3 studies are performed after preliminary evidence suggesting effectiveness of the drug has been obtained in previous Phase 2 studies. These studies are intended to gather the additional information about effectiveness and safety that is needed to evaluate the overall benefit-risk relationship of the drug.

Study participants will take the oral investigational medication daily. One cycle of study treatment lasts 4 weeks or 28 days. The number of cycles will depend on how you and your cancer respond to the study medication.

In order for the researchers to evaluate and compare the study results, there are two different study groups. Study participants will be randomly (like flipping a coin) assigned to one of these groups:

* One group will receive their current treatment along with the investigational medication
* One group will receive their current medications along with a placebo

The investigational medication will be given to 2 out of every 3 study participants. Neither you nor the study staff will know which group you are in. However, in case of a medical emergency, your study doctor can quickly find out which treatment group you are in.

All participants will continue to receive their current treatment along with either the investigational medication or a placebo. The selections will be random, and you may remain on investigational treatment until your disease worsens, or until significant side effects occur or you can no longer tolerate treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostatic Neoplasms

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Prostate neoplasms Prostate cancer Castration-resistant prostate cancer Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer ARN-509 Apalutamide

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment Arm A: Apalutamide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Apalutamide

Intervention Type DRUG

240 mg tablets administered by mouth on a continuous once daily dosing regimen

Treatment Arm B: Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matched placebo tablets administered by mouth on a continuous once daily dosing regimen

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Apalutamide

240 mg tablets administered by mouth on a continuous once daily dosing regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matched placebo tablets administered by mouth on a continuous once daily dosing regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate without neuroendocrine differentiation or small cell features with high risk for development of metastases, defined as prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) less than or equal to (\<=) 10 months. PSADT is calculated using at least 3 prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values obtained during continuous ADT (androgen deprivation therapy)
* Castration-resistant prostate cancer demonstrated during continuous ADT, defined as 3 PSA rises, at least 1 week apart, with the last PSA greater than (\>) 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
* Maintain castrate levels of testosterone within 4 weeks prior to randomization and throughout the study
* Patients currently receiving bone loss prevention treatment with bone-sparing agents must be on stable doses for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization
* Patients who received a first generation anti-androgen (for example, bicalutamide, flutamide, nilutamide) must have at least a 4-week washout prior to randomization AND must show continuing disease (PSA) progression (an increase in PSA) after washout
* At least 4 weeks must have elapsed from the use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, estrogens, and any other anti-cancer therapy prior to randomization
* At least 4 weeks must have elapsed from major surgery or radiation therapy prior to randomization
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0 or 1
* Resolution of all acute toxic effects of prior therapy or surgical procedure to Grade \<= 1 or baseline prior to randomization
* Adequate organ function according to protocol-defined criteria
* Administration of growth factors or blood transfusions will not be allowed within 4 weeks of the hematology labs required to confirm eligibility

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of confirmed distant metastases, including central nervous system and vertebral or meningeal involvement
* Symptomatic local or regional disease requiring medical intervention
* Prior treatment with second generation anti-androgens
* Prior treatment with CYP17 inhibitors
* Prior treatment with radiopharmaceutical agents, or any other investigational agent for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
* Prior chemotherapy for prostate cancer except if administered in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting
* History of seizure or condition that may pre-dispose to seizure
* Concurrent therapy with protocol-defined excluded medications
* History or evidence of any of the following conditions: any prior malignancy (other than adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, or any other cancer in situ currently in complete remission) within 5 years prior to randomization; severe/unstable angina, myocardial infarction, symptomatic congestive heart failure, arterial or venous thromboembolic events, or clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias within 6 months prior to randomization; uncontrolled hypertension; gastrointestinal disorder affecting absorption; active infection; and, any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would impair the patient's ability to comply with study procedures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aragon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aragon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Aragon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Laguna Woods, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Bernardino, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Sherman Oaks, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Tarzana, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Glenwood Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Grand Junction, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Carmel, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Muncie, Indiana, United States

Site Status

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Westwood, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Annapolis, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Southaven, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Hooksett, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Mount Laurel, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Oneida, New York, United States

Site Status

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Concord, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middletown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Bend, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Tualatin, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

West Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Abilene, Texas, United States

Site Status

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

McAllen, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Burien, Washington, United States

Site Status

Edmonds, Washington, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Box Hill, , Australia

Site Status

Camperdown, , Australia

Site Status

Darlinghurst, , Australia

Site Status

Geelong, , Australia

Site Status

Gosford, , Australia

Site Status

Hobart, , Australia

Site Status

Kogarah, , Australia

Site Status

Liverpool, , Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Nedlands, , Australia

Site Status

Parkville, , Australia

Site Status

South Woodville, , Australia

Site Status

Southport, , Australia

Site Status

Sydney, , Australia

Site Status

Tweed Heads, , Australia

Site Status

Wollongong, , Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Ottignies, , Belgium

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Brantford, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

North York, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Oakville, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Owen Sound, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Gatineau, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Granby, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Liberec, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Opava, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Aalborg C, , Denmark

Site Status

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Seinäjoki, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Caen Cédex 05, , France

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Hyers, , France

Site Status

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Lille Cedex N/a, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Reims, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Saint-Grégoire, , France

Site Status

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Suresnes, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Bergisch Gladbach, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Braunschweig, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Duisburg, , Germany

Site Status

Emmendingen, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Greifswald, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Heinsberg, , Germany

Site Status

Homburg/Saar, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Kirchheim unter Teck, , Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mettmann, , Germany

Site Status

Müllheim, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Nürtingen, , Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Weiden, , Germany

Site Status

Wilhelmshaven, , Germany

Site Status

Wuppertan, , Germany

Site Status

Zirndorf, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyhá, , Hungary

Site Status

Sopron, , Hungary

Site Status

Szentes, , Hungary

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jeruselem, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Ẕerifin, , Israel

Site Status

Akita, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Gifu, , Japan

Site Status

Hakodate, , Japan

Site Status

Hiroshima, , Japan

Site Status

Hokkaido, , Japan

Site Status

Kanazawa, , Japan

Site Status

Kashiwa, , Japan

Site Status

Kita-Gun, , Japan

Site Status

Kobe, , Japan

Site Status

Koshigaya, , Japan

Site Status

Kumamoto, , Japan

Site Status

Kurume, , Japan

Site Status

Matsuyama, , Japan

Site Status

Nagano, , Japan

Site Status

Nagasaki, , Japan

Site Status

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Niigata, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Ōsaka-sayama, , Japan

Site Status

Sagamihara, , Japan

Site Status

Sakura, , Japan

Site Status

Sapporo, , Japan

Site Status

Shinjuku-Ku, , Japan

Site Status

Tokushima, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Ube, , Japan

Site Status

Wakayama, , Japan

Site Status

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Alkmaar, , Netherlands

Site Status

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Hoofddorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leidschendam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Nelson, , New Zealand

Site Status

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

Whangarei, , New Zealand

Site Status

Nordbyhagen, , Norway

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Kutno, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, , Romania

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Obninsk, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trenčín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Gwangju, , South Korea

Site Status

Pusan, , South Korea

Site Status

Seongnam, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Castellon, , Spain

Site Status

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Spain

Site Status

Jerez de la Frontera, , Spain

Site Status

Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

San Sebastián de los Reyes, , Spain

Site Status

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan, , Taiwan

Site Status

Blackburn, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Dundee, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Guildford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Maidstone, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Surrey, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Swansea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ireland United States Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czechia Denmark Finland France Germany Hungary Israel Japan Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Romania Russia Slovakia South Korea Spain Sweden Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ni X, Sui J, Wang B, Wang H, Freedland SJ, Ye D, Zhu Y. Lower Testosterone Level and Metastases-Free Survival in Patients With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Novel Antiandrogens: A Post Hoc Analysis of SPARTAN and ARAMIS. J Urol. 2025 Jul;214(1):10-17. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004545. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40132221 (View on PubMed)

Feng FY, Smith MR, Saad F, Mobadersany P, Tian SK, Yip SSF, Greshock J, Khan N, Yu MK, McCarthy S, Brookman-May SD, Bourla AB, Todorovic T, Yamashita R, Huang HC, Royce TJ, Showalter TN, Griffin J, Mitani A, Esteva A, Small EJ. Digital Pathology-Based Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Scores and Outcomes in a Randomized Phase III Trial in Men With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Jan;9:e2400653. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00653. Epub 2025 Jan 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39889245 (View on PubMed)

Roy S, Malone S, Wing K, Chowdhury S, Kishan AU, Sun Y, Wallis CJD, Mohamad O, Jia AY, Swami U, Zaorsky NG, Morgan SC, Ong M, Agarwal N, Spratt DE, Small EJ, Saad F. Prior Local Therapy and First-Line Apalutamide in Patients With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the SPARTAN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2439434. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.39434.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39405060 (View on PubMed)

Karsh LI, Bevans KB, Saad F, Chung BH, Oudard S, Brookman-May SD, McCarthy SA, Smith MR, Chi KN, Small EJ, Agarwal N. Prostate-specific antigen and health-related quality of life in individuals with advanced prostate cancer treated with apalutamide: a plain language summary of the SPARTAN and TITAN studies. Future Oncol. 2024;20(35):2689-2698. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2384257. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39163505 (View on PubMed)

Shen J, Chowdhury S, Agarwal N, Karsh LI, Oudard S, Gartrell BA, Feyerabend S, Saad F, Pieczonka CM, Chi KN, Brookman-May SD, Rooney B, Bhaumik A, McCarthy SA, Bevans KB, Mundle SD, Small EJ, Smith MR, Graff JN. Apalutamide efficacy, safety and wellbeing in older patients with advanced prostate cancer from Phase 3 randomised clinical studies TITAN and SPARTAN. Br J Cancer. 2024 Jan;130(1):73-81. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02492-8. Epub 2023 Nov 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37951974 (View on PubMed)

Pollock Y, Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, Oudard S, Hadaschik B, Olmos D, Lee JY, Uemura H, Bhaumik A, Londhe A, Rooney B, Brookman-May SD, De Porre P, Mundle SD, Small EJ. Clinical characteristics associated with falls in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with apalutamide. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Mar;26(1):156-161. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00592-9. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36209239 (View on PubMed)

Chowdhury S, Oudard S, Uemura H, Joniau S, Dearden L, Capone C, Van Sanden S, Diels J, Hadaschik BA. Apalutamide Compared with Darolutamide for the Treatment of Non-metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Efficacy and Tolerability in a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):518-531. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01885-6. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34797506 (View on PubMed)

Uemura H, Koroki Y, Iwaki Y, Imanaka K, Kambara T, Lopez-Gitlitz A, Smith A, Uemura H. Skin rash following Administration of Apalutamide in Japanese patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: an integrated analysis of the phase 3 SPARTAN and TITAN studies and a phase 1 open-label study. BMC Urol. 2020 Sep 2;20(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00689-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32878613 (View on PubMed)

Smith MR, Mehra M, Nair S, Lawson J, Small EJ. Relationship Between Metastasis-free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients With Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Apr;18(2):e180-e189. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.10.030. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31980408 (View on PubMed)

Saad F, Cella D, Basch E, Hadaschik BA, Mainwaring PN, Oudard S, Graff JN, McQuarrie K, Li S, Hudgens S, Lawson J, Lopez-Gitlitz A, Yu MK, Smith MR, Small EJ. Effect of apalutamide on health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of the SPARTAN randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1404-1416. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30456-X. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30213449 (View on PubMed)

Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, Oudard S, Hadaschik BA, Graff JN, Olmos D, Mainwaring PN, Lee JY, Uemura H, Lopez-Gitlitz A, Trudel GC, Espina BM, Shu Y, Park YC, Rackoff WR, Yu MK, Small EJ; SPARTAN Investigators. Apalutamide Treatment and Metastasis-free Survival in Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 12;378(15):1408-1418. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715546. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29420164 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ARN-509-003; 56021927PCR1007

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2012-004322-24

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR102931

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id