Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Post-cesarean Delivery Pain - a Dose Finding Study
NCT ID: NCT01943565
Last Updated: 2017-06-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
29 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-12-31
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
For many years, the opioid of choice was morphine due to its long anesthetic effect and acceptable side effect profile. A nation-wide disruption in the supply of preservative-free morphine has made it necessary to look for alternatives. Many institutions worldwide have used another opioid, called hydromorphone, in the spinal space for over a decade. This drug has a very good safety and side effect profile and has been used at the investigators' institution for more than a year. Of interest, while a number of different doses of hydromorphone have been used, there have been very few studies to evaluate the best dose for providing good pain relief with minimal side effects. The goal of this study is to find the best dose of spinal hydromorphone for women undergoing cesarean delivery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Pain Control After Cesarean Section
NCT02096003
Intrathecal Opioids for Pain Control After Cesarean Delivery: Determining the Optimal Dose
NCT02009722
Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Cesarean Section
NCT02067520
Spinal Morphine vs. Hydromorphone for Pain Control After Cesarean Delivery
NCT02789410
Hydromorphone and C-section
NCT01598545
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the investigators' institute, during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is usually performed with 1.6-1.8 ml of 0.75% bupivacaine with dextrose (hyperbaric solution) with 10-20mcg of fentanyl. Preservative free intrathecal (IT) morphine100 to 200 mcg is injected at the time of initiation of spinal block for postoperative pain relief. Multiple studies have shown excellent postoperative pain relief following cesarean delivery up to 18hrs with this dosing regimen.
However, there has been a national shortage of preservative free morphine since August 2012. Based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, intrathecal (IT) preservative free hydromorphone 100 mcg has been used as a substitute. Anecdotal experience during the past 8 months suggest that patients have comparable post partum pain relief, with a similar side-effect profile to IT morphine.
There is no published data on the optimal dose of IT hydromorphone for post cesarean analgesia. There are case reports and retrospective case study of use of 100mcg IT hydromorphone. One randomized controlled trial for knee arthroscopy used 2.5-5-10 mcg of IT hydromorphone for postoperative analgesia.
Hence it is important to determine the optimal dose of IT hydromorphone for post operative pain management following cesarean delivery in terms of analgesic efficacy, incidence of side effects and the need for treatment interventions
This study will aim to determine the optimal dose of intrathecal hydromorphone that would provide adequate postoperative analgesia with minimal side effects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hydromorphone 25mcg
The arm will receive 25mcg intrathecal hydromorphone to supplement the spinal anesthesia
Hydromorphone 25mcg
Intrathecal Hydromorphone 25mcg
spinal anesthesia
bupivacaine 0.75% 1.6 mL (12mg)
Hydromorphone 50mcg
The arm will receive 50mcg intrathecal hydromorphone to supplement the spinal anesthesia
Hydromorphone 50mcg
Intrathecal Hydromorphone 50mcg
spinal anesthesia
bupivacaine 0.75% 1.6 mL (12mg)
Hydromorphone 100mcg
The arm will receive 100mcg intrathecal hydromorphone to supplement the spinal anesthesia
Hydromorphone 100mcg
Intrathecal Hydromorphone 100mcg
spinal anesthesia
bupivacaine 0.75% 1.6 mL (12mg)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hydromorphone 25mcg
Intrathecal Hydromorphone 25mcg
Hydromorphone 50mcg
Intrathecal Hydromorphone 50mcg
Hydromorphone 100mcg
Intrathecal Hydromorphone 100mcg
spinal anesthesia
bupivacaine 0.75% 1.6 mL (12mg)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Respiratory disease
* significant comorbidities: preeclampsia, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
* obstructive sleep apnea
* body mass index \> 35kg/m2
* \<18yrs
* documented intolerance or allergy to systemic or neuraxial opioids
* patient with a history of chronic opioid or current use of opioids
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dirk Varelmann, MD
Instructor of Anaesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dirk J Varelmann, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wang JK, Nauss LA, Thomas JE. Pain relief by intrathecally applied morphine in man. Anesthesiology. 1979 Feb;50(2):149-51. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197902000-00013. No abstract available.
Ross BK, Hughes SC. Epidural and spinal narcotic analgesia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Sep;30(3):552-65. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198709000-00010. No abstract available.
Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999 Feb;90(2):437-44. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199902000-00018.
Milner AR, Bogod DG, Harwood RJ. Intrathecal administration of morphine for elective Caesarean section. A comparison between 0.1 mg and 0.2 mg. Anaesthesia. 1996 Sep;51(9):871-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb12622.x.
Lee YS, Park YC, Kim JH, Kim WY, Yoon SZ, Moon MG, Min TJ. Intrathecal hydromorphone added to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after knee arthroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jan;29(1):17-21. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283476055.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Hydromorphone_IT
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2013P001850
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.