Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of SIMBRINZA® Suspension as an Added Therapy to a Prostaglandin Analogue (NCT NCT01937312)
NCT ID: NCT01937312
Last Updated: 2015-07-28
Results Overview
Diurnal IOP was defined as the average of the four timepoints measured (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM). IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analysis. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage).
COMPLETED
PHASE4
282 participants
Week 6
2015-07-28
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited and enrolled from 30 investigative sites located in the US.
Of the 282 enrolled, 93 participants were exited from the study as screen failures prior to randomization. This reporting group includes all randomized participants (189). Note: One subject randomized to SIMBRINZA® Suspension was not exposed to investigational product.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SIMBRINZA
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
Vehicle
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
94
|
95
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
93
|
95
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
83
|
92
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
SIMBRINZA
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
Vehicle
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
10
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal of subject prior to treatment
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Effect of SIMBRINZA® Suspension as an Added Therapy to a Prostaglandin Analogue
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
SIMBRINZA
n=88 Participants
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
Vehicle
n=94 Participants
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
Total
n=182 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=93 Participants
|
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 • n=4 Participants
|
65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
53 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
116 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
35 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Baseline
|
22.68 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.123 • n=93 Participants
|
22.39 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.774 • n=4 Participants
|
22.53 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.478 • n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: This analysis population includes all subjects who received study medication and completed at least 1 scheduled on-therapy visit (intent-to-treat). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was not utilized; therefore, results report subjects present at Week 6 with no imputation for missingness.
Diurnal IOP was defined as the average of the four timepoints measured (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM). IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analysis. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SIMBRINZA
n=83 Participants
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
Vehicle
n=92 Participants
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6
|
17.01 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.897
|
20.37 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.914
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6Population: This analysis population includes all subjects who received study medication and completed at least 1 scheduled on-therapy visit (intent-to-treat). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was not utilized; therefore, results report subjects present at Week 6 with no imputation for missingness.
Baseline IOP was defined as the average of the timepoint-matched IOP measurements at Eligibility 1 and Eligibility 2 Visits. Diurnal IOP change was defined as the average of the four changes from baseline (timepoints 8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM). IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analysis. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SIMBRINZA
n=83 Participants
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
Vehicle
n=92 Participants
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Diurnal IOP Change From Baseline to Week 6
|
-5.69 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.571
|
-1.99 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.865
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6Population: This analysis population includes all subjects who received study medication and completed at least 1 scheduled on-therapy visit (intent-to-treat). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was not utilized; therefore, results report subjects present at Week 6 with no imputation for missingness.
Baseline IOP was defined as the average of the timepoint-matched IOP measurements at Eligibility 1 and Eligibility 2 Visits. Diurnal IOP Percentage Change was defined as the average of the four percent changes from baseline (timepoints 8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM). IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analysis. A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater amount of improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SIMBRINZA
n=83 Participants
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
Vehicle
n=92 Participants
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Diurnal IOP Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 6
|
-24.88 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.818
|
-8.50 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.396
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: This analysis population includes all subjects who received study medication and completed at least 1 scheduled on-therapy visit (intent-to-treat). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was not utilized; therefore, results report subjects present at Week 6 with no imputation for missingness.
IOP was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. One eye was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the analysis. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SIMBRINZA
n=83 Participants
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
Vehicle
n=92 Participants
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean IOP at Week 6 for Each Time Point (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, 5 PM)
8 AM
|
19.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.53
|
21.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 4.33
|
|
Mean IOP at Week 6 for Each Time Point (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, 5 PM)
10 AM
|
15.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
20.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 4.17
|
|
Mean IOP at Week 6 for Each Time Point (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, 5 PM)
3 PM
|
17.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.15
|
19.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 4.28
|
|
Mean IOP at Week 6 for Each Time Point (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, 5 PM)
5 PM
|
15.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.14
|
19.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 4.41
|
Adverse Events
Pre-Treatment
SIMBRINZA
Vehicle
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Pre-Treatment
n=282 participants at risk
Prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime for a 4-week run-in period
|
SIMBRINZA
n=93 participants at risk
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
Vehicle
n=95 participants at risk
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/282 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
1.1%
1/93 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/95 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic malignant melanoma
|
0.00%
0/282 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
1.1%
1/93 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/95 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Pre-Treatment
n=282 participants at risk
Prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime for a 4-week run-in period
|
SIMBRINZA
n=93 participants at risk
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
Vehicle
n=95 participants at risk
1 drop in each eye 3 times a day (8 AM, 3 PM, 10 PM), with prostaglandin analogue, 1 drop in each eye at bedtime, for 6 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Vision Blurred
|
0.00%
0/282 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
9.7%
9/93 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
6.3%
6/95 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye irritation
|
0.35%
1/282 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
6.5%
6/93 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
1.1%
1/95 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/282 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
6.5%
6/93 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/95 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
|
0.71%
2/282 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
5.4%
5/93 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
2.1%
2/95 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study, Oct 2013-May 2014. Adverse events are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent. The treatment-emergent analysis set included all subjects exposed to investigational product.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was administered a study medication, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the medication. All AEs were obtained as solicited and spontaneous comments from the subjects, and as observations by the Investigator, as outlined in the study protocol.
|
Additional Information
Global Brand Leader, Medical Affairs, Glaucoma
Alcon Research, Ltd.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor reserves the right of prior review of any publication or presentation of information related to the study.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER