Psychosomatic Therapy, Feasibility and Cost Analysis

NCT ID: NCT01935258

Last Updated: 2015-09-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2015-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are a common and important problem in primary care. Patients repeatedly presenting MUS to their general practitioner (GP) suffer from their symptoms, are functionally impaired, and are at risk of unnecessary and possibly harmful tests, referrals and treatment. Evidence indicate that specific interventions for patients with MUS, such as reattribution therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy are of limited help. According to experts in this field a multi-component approach is most helpful for these patients.

This pilot trial aims to test the systematic identification of eligible patients, to assess the acceptability of the intervention and to estimate potential treatment effects for a larger trial.

It's a randomised pilot study consisting of patients with MUS in primary care. Patients will be randomized to intervention (usual care and additional psychosomatic therapy) or control condition (usual care alone). Patients will be followed for one year.

Participants are patients consulting their GP more than once with MUS and in which the GP presumes that psychosocial distress is an underlying cause.

The intervention is the psychosomatic therapy delivered by a psychosomatic therapist, consists of a combination of information and education, relaxation therapy and mindfulness, cognitive approaches and activating therapy. This multi-component approach is captured into a protocol in which therapists are able to modify the treatment in order to deliver a tailor-made treatment for patients with MUS.

Primary outcome measures are: the number of patients identified and recruited, perceived symptom severity, measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and patients' self-rated symptoms of distress, depression, anxiety and somatization (4DSQ: The Four Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire). Other primary outcome measures are the time needed to include the eligible patients, the number of withdrawals in the intervention and control group, compliance in the therapy group and the number of patients who complete the questionnaires.

Secondary outcome measures are: symptoms of hyperventilation (NHL: Nijmegen Hyperventilation List), physical and mental health status and quality of life (SF-36), and level of functioning (MAF: measure of general functioning). Patient satisfaction with the received therapy is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Medical consumption will be measured by the Cost Diary for medical consumption.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recruitment and signed informed consent:Participating GPs (n=6) were asked to enrol each consecutive eligible patient and include 10 patients with MUS each. The GPs presented written information and an informed consent form to these patients. Patients had the opportunity to read the information to consider participation before signing the consent form.

Randomisation: Participating patients (n=60) are equally randomised over two groups, the intervention group (usual care and psychosomatic therapy delivered by a psychosomatic therapist) and the control group (usual care of the GP). For the randomisation we used a random number table, whereas a central and blinded allocation procedure was applied.For the randomisation we used a random number table, whereas a central and blinded allocation procedure was applied.

Patients in the intervention group were asked to complete a questionnaire at baseline, at the end of the intervention (+/- 3 months)and at 6 and 12 months. Patients in the control group completed a questionnaire at baseline, at 3 (equals end of intervention), 6 and 12 months.

Statistical analysis The number of patients identified and recruited by the GP as well as the number of eligible patients who declined to enter the trial were analysed using descriptive statistics. Furthermore, at each stage of the study, we recorded the number of trial participants who completed the study.

The effects of the intervention on the primary outcome measures (VAS and 4DSQ) and the secondary outcome measures (NHL, SF-36 and MAF) were estimated using analysis of covariance with baseline value as a covariate. Data analysis was be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Medical consumption was measured using the Cost Diary for medical consumption. Patients recorded their absenteeism and healthcare consumption, such as consulting a GP, hospital, paramedic facilities and alternative medicine. Medication intake was recorded at the start and the end of the study. We used standardised Dutch prices (guide cost research 2009), whereas medication costs were calculated according to the Dutch Pharmaco Therapeutic Compass. Costs by absenteeism were calculated according to the Friction Cost method.

Difference in cost of medical consumption between the control and intervention group were estimated using analysis of covariance with baseline value as a covariate.

Difference in baseline characteristics were analysed with the student's t-test for continue variables and the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. P-values of \< 0.05 were considered statistical significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Medically Unexplained Symptoms Psychosomatic Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Psychosomatic therapy

Psychosomatic therapy consists of a combination of information and education delivery, relaxation therapy and mindfulness, cognitive approaches and activating therapy. This multi-component approach is captured into a protocol in which therapists are able to modify the treatment in order to deliver a tailor-made treatment for patients with MUS. Psychosomatic therapy delivered by a psychosomatic therapist.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Psychosomatic therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Psychosomatic therapy delivered by a psychosomatic therapist, consists of a combination of information and education delivery, relaxation therapy and mindfulness, cognitive approaches and activating therapy. This multi-component approach is captured into a protocol in which therapists are able to modify the treatment in order to deliver a tailor-made treatment for patients with MUS.

care as usual

Intervention Type OTHER

usual care of the general practitioner

care as usual

Usual care of the general practitioner

Group Type OTHER

care as usual

Intervention Type OTHER

usual care of the general practitioner

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Psychosomatic therapy

Psychosomatic therapy delivered by a psychosomatic therapist, consists of a combination of information and education delivery, relaxation therapy and mindfulness, cognitive approaches and activating therapy. This multi-component approach is captured into a protocol in which therapists are able to modify the treatment in order to deliver a tailor-made treatment for patients with MUS.

Intervention Type OTHER

care as usual

usual care of the general practitioner

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

patients with medical unexplained symptoms who consulting the general practitioner more than once for one or more of the 12 most common symptoms:

* stomach-/abdominal pain,
* back/neck/shoulder pain,
* pain in arms/legs/joints,
* headache, chest pain,
* dizziness,
* fainting spells,
* palpitations of the heart,
* shortness of breath,
* nausea/indigestion,
* feeling tired,
* sleeping disorder and psychosocial distress

Exclusion Criteria

* patients wich chronic diseases,
* palliative care,
* severe psychiatric disorders,
* long-lasting injury treatment
* patients who are not able to speak, read and write Dutch
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tim olde Hartman

Dr T.C. olde Hartman

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tim C. olde Hartman, MD Phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

General Practitioner, Douwes Dekker

Albergen, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status

General Practitioner, Hesselink

Borne, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status

General Practitioner,Tuijnenburg

Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status

General Practitioner, Kleissen

Haaksbergen, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status

General Practitioner, van der Waart

Hengelo, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status

General Practitioner, Van Rijn

Vriezenveen, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status

M. Oijevaar

Borne, , Netherlands

Site Status

D.J. Jansen

Julianadorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wortman MS, Lucassen PL, van Ravesteijn HJ, Bor H, Assendelft PJ, Lucas C, Olde Hartman TC. Brief multimodal psychosomatic therapy in patients with medically unexplained symptoms: feasibility and treatment effects. Fam Pract. 2016 Aug;33(4):346-53. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw023. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27075027 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012/365

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

High-Intensity Inpatient MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy for PTSD
NCT06954025 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE2