Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Global Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain (NCT NCT01931670)
NCT ID: NCT01931670
Last Updated: 2018-09-07
Results Overview
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.85 or greater from Baseline in DYS pain as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
815 participants
At Month 3 of the Treatment Period
2018-09-07
Participant Flow
Participants were randomized at 187 sites in Argentina, Austria, Australia, Brazil, Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, South Africa, Spain, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
The study consisted of 4 periods: a Washout Period (if applicable); a Screening Period of ≤ 100 days prior to first dose; a 6-month Treatment Period; and a Post-Treatment Follow-up Period of ≤ 12 months (if applicable). Participants were randomized into the study in a 3:2:2 ratio to placebo, elagolix 150 mg QD, or elagolix 200 mg BID, respectively.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo twice daily (BID) for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
Elagolix 150 mg once daily (QD) for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period
STARTED
|
360
|
226
|
229
|
|
Treatment Period
COMPLETED
|
270
|
178
|
184
|
|
Treatment Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
90
|
48
|
45
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
STARTED
|
61
|
40
|
54
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Completed PTFU Month 6
|
42
|
24
|
18
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Completed PTFU Month 12
|
0
|
4
|
15
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
COMPLETED
|
42
|
28
|
33
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
19
|
12
|
21
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo twice daily (BID) for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
Elagolix 150 mg once daily (QD) for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period
Exclusionary Medication Received
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Treatment Period
Surgery/Invasive Intervention
|
4
|
2
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period
Subject Noncompliant
|
4
|
9
|
5
|
|
Treatment Period
Adverse Event
|
19
|
8
|
21
|
|
Treatment Period
Lack of Efficacy
|
11
|
2
|
2
|
|
Treatment Period
Pregnancy
|
7
|
2
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period
Other
|
8
|
7
|
2
|
|
Treatment Period
Consent Withdrawn by Subject
|
17
|
12
|
7
|
|
Treatment Period
Lost to Follow-up
|
19
|
5
|
7
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Exclusionary Medication Received
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Adverse Event
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Surgery/Invasive Intervention
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Other
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Consent Withdrawn by Subject
|
6
|
3
|
13
|
|
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Global Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=360 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=226 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=229 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Total
n=815 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.69 • n=5 Participants
|
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.80 • n=7 Participants
|
33.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.67 • n=5 Participants
|
33.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.71 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
360 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
226 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
229 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
815 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Month 3 of the Treatment PeriodPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set; all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Population included mITT participants who either had data during the Month 3 35-day window or who prematurely discontinued prior to or at Month 3 and met the rules for last observation carried forward.
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.85 or greater from Baseline in DYS pain as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=353 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Dysmenorrhea (DYS)
|
22.7 percentage of participants
|
43.4 percentage of participants
|
72.4 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Month 3 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set; all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Population included mITT participants who either had data during the Month 3 35-day window or who prematurely discontinued prior to or at Month 3 and met the rules for last observation carried forward.
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.43 or greater from Baseline in NMPP as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=353 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP)
|
36.5 percentage of participants
|
49.8 percentage of participants
|
57.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of the Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.
The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=312 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=204 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=209 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Scores
|
-1.33 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.097
|
-1.90 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.122
|
-2.55 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.122
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=273 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=185 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=187 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in DYS
|
-0.52 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
-1.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.057
|
-1.65 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.057
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=273 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=185 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=187 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in NMPP
|
-0.48 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.035
|
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
|
-0.80 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.
Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 or 550 mg), and one country-specific narcotic analgesic (5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen). Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=312 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=204 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=209 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
|
-0.31 number of pills
Standard Error 0.028
|
-0.36 number of pills
Standard Error 0.035
|
-0.49 number of pills
Standard Error 0.034
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.
Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 or 550 mg), and one country-specific narcotic analgesic (5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen). Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=273 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=185 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=187 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
|
-0.32 number of pills
Standard Error 0.030
|
-0.40 number of pills
Standard Error 0.038
|
-0.52 number of pills
Standard Error 0.037
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants who responded "not applicable" for the entire time point and at Baseline are excluded from the analysis.
The DYSP pain scale ranges from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=145 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=150 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Dyspareunia (DYSP)
|
-0.30 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
|
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.052
|
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.052
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.
Permitted country-specific rescue narcotic analgesics included 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=312 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=204 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=209 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Use of Narcotic Class of Medication (Opioids)
|
-0.12 number of pills
Standard Error 0.019
|
-0.12 number of pills
Standard Error 0.024
|
-0.21 number of pills
Standard Error 0.023
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of the Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Last observation carried forward. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.85 or greater from Baseline in DYS pain as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS
Month 1
|
17.3 percentage of participants
|
33.0 percentage of participants
|
46.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS
Month 2
|
19.0 percentage of participants
|
39.4 percentage of participants
|
69.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS
Month 4
|
21.2 percentage of participants
|
45.9 percentage of participants
|
79.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS
Month 5
|
23.7 percentage of participants
|
44.1 percentage of participants
|
80.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS
Month 6
|
25.4 percentage of participants
|
46.2 percentage of participants
|
76.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of the Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Last observation carried forward. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.43 or greater from Baseline in NMPP as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP
Month 1
|
23.5 percentage of participants
|
27.6 percentage of participants
|
29.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP
Month 2
|
32.1 percentage of participants
|
39.8 percentage of participants
|
50.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP
Month 4
|
38.7 percentage of participants
|
51.4 percentage of participants
|
63.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP
Month 5
|
39.8 percentage of participants
|
50.5 percentage of participants
|
63.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP
Month 6
|
40.6 percentage of participants
|
51.6 percentage of participants
|
62.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Last observation carried forward. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.29 or greater from Baseline in DYSP as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=168 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=171 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 1
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
33.8 percentage of participants
|
35.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 2
|
33.2 percentage of participants
|
39.9 percentage of participants
|
47.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 3
|
39.5 percentage of participants
|
44.0 percentage of participants
|
53.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 4
|
38.5 percentage of participants
|
41.3 percentage of participants
|
59.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 5
|
37.4 percentage of participants
|
42.8 percentage of participants
|
58.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 6
|
39.4 percentage of participants
|
39.9 percentage of participants
|
55.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Prior to administering study drug), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 1
|
-0.33 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
|
-0.86 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
|
-1.11 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 2
|
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
|
-0.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.053
|
-1.67 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.053
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 3
|
-0.45 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
|
-0.97 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.053
|
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.052
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 4
|
-0.47 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
|
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.054
|
-1.74 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.054
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 5
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.045
|
-0.99 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.055
|
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.055
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=224 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 1
|
-14.36 percentage change
Standard Error 2.268
|
-39.67 percentage change
Standard Error 2.886
|
-53.68 percentage change
Standard Error 2.867
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 2
|
-17.36 percentage change
Standard Error 2.087
|
-39.26 percentage change
Standard Error 2.629
|
-80.68 percentage change
Standard Error 2.638
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 3
|
-20.58 percentage change
Standard Error 2.031
|
-45.73 percentage change
Standard Error 2.528
|
-82.52 percentage change
Standard Error 2.513
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 4
|
-21.55 percentage change
Standard Error 2.104
|
-48.52 percentage change
Standard Error 2.601
|
-83.92 percentage change
Standard Error 2.599
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 5
|
-22.63 percentage change
Standard Error 2.159
|
-45.99 percentage change
Standard Error 2.664
|
-85.53 percentage change
Standard Error 2.650
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 6
|
-23.81 percentage change
Standard Error 2.225
|
-49.70 percentage change
Standard Error 2.738
|
-80.43 percentage change
Standard Error 2.727
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 1
|
-0.22 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.025
|
-0.24 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.031
|
-0.31 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.031
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 2
|
-0.34 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.027
|
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.034
|
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.034
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 3
|
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.031
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.039
|
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.039
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 4
|
-0.45 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.033
|
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.041
|
-0.78 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.041
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 5
|
-0.48 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.034
|
-0.58 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
|
-0.81 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 1
|
-12.43 percentage change
Standard Deviation 1.814
|
-15.47 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.313
|
-18.86 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.288
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 2
|
-21.13 percentage change
Standard Deviation 1.836
|
-26.30 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.326
|
-34.32 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.316
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 3
|
-25.78 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.104
|
-32.63 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.643
|
-44.83 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.625
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 4
|
-29.94 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.170
|
-36.19 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.711
|
-51.52 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.696
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 5
|
-31.96 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.214
|
-38.17 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.756
|
-53.61 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.737
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 6
|
-31.25 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.349
|
-42.09 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.914
|
-52.42 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.897
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants who responded "not applicable" for the entire time point and at Baseline are excluded from the analysis. Participants with an assessment at given timepoint.
The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=261 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=161 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=171 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP
Month 2
|
-0.25 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.038
|
-0.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
-0.49 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP
Month 1
|
-0.21 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.037
|
-0.19 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.046
|
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.045
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP
Month 4
|
-0.35 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.045
|
-0.40 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.055
|
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.055
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP
Month 5
|
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.046
|
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
|
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP
Month 6
|
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.049
|
-0.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.058
|
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.058
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 4, 5Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.
Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 or 550 mg), and one country-specific narcotic analgesic (5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen). Assessment was based on average pill counts.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Months 3 and 6, in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Month 1
|
-0.20 number of pills
Standard Error 0.024
|
-0.29 number of pills
Standard Error 0.031
|
-0.32 number of pills
Standard Error 0.031
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Months 3 and 6, in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Month 2
|
-0.25 number of pills
Standard Error 0.026
|
-0.32 number of pills
Standard Error 0.033
|
-0.44 number of pills
Standard Error 0.033
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Months 3 and 6, in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Month 4
|
-0.29 number of pills
Standard Error 0.028
|
-0.38 number of pills
Standard Error 0.035
|
-0.51 number of pills
Standard Error 0.035
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Months 3 and 6, in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Month 5
|
-0.32 number of pills
Standard Error 0.030
|
-0.37 number of pills
Standard Error 0.038
|
-0.54 number of pills
Standard Error 0.038
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Last observation carried forward. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=337 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=214 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=215 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 1
|
3.49 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.062
|
3.12 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.078
|
2.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.077
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 2
|
3.24 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.063
|
2.62 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.079
|
2.15 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.079
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 3
|
3.16 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.066
|
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
|
2.02 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 4
|
3.19 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.068
|
2.56 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 5
|
3.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.070
|
2.43 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 6
|
3.22 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.073
|
2.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.090
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.091
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores
Month 1
|
-0.78 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.074
|
-1.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.094
|
-1.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.093
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores
Month 2
|
-1.08 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
|
-1.62 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.108
|
-2.04 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.107
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores
Month 4
|
-1.49 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.102
|
-2.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.128
|
-2.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.128
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores
Month 5
|
-1.58 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.105
|
-2.19 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.131
|
-2.95 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.131
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores
Month 6
|
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.110
|
-2.28 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.137
|
-2.87 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.136
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=331 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=213 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=213 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Pain Domain of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Questionnaire Scores
Month 1
|
-15.20 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.971
|
-19.40 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.210
|
-22.75 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.211
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Pain Domain of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Questionnaire Scores
Month 3
|
-19.29 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.103
|
-26.62 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.349
|
-34.72 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.360
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Pain Domain of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Questionnaire Scores
Month 6
|
-19.53 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.340
|
-28.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.601
|
-36.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.572
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=150 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=155 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of EHP-30 Questionnaire Scores
Month 1
|
-9.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.229
|
-10.46 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.510
|
-14.29 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.484
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of EHP-30 Questionnaire Scores
Month 3
|
-14.51 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.502
|
-17.26 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.895
|
-25.20 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.848
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of EHP-30 Questionnaire Scores
Month 6
|
-14.14 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.891
|
-17.07 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.215
|
-28.24 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.095
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=239 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=150 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=146 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 1
|
-0.61 hours
Standard Error 0.267
|
-1.62 hours
Standard Error 0.336
|
-1.56 hours
Standard Error 0.341
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 2
|
-0.82 hours
Standard Error 0.246
|
-1.80 hours
Standard Error 0.312
|
-2.25 hours
Standard Error 0.312
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 3
|
-0.76 hours
Standard Error 0.268
|
-1.43 hours
Standard Error 0.338
|
-2.17 hours
Standard Error 0.336
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 4
|
-0.55 hours
Standard Error 0.355
|
-1.81 hours
Standard Error 0.434
|
-2.03 hours
Standard Error 0.426
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 5
|
-0.85 hours
Standard Error 0.209
|
-1.58 hours
Standard Error 0.251
|
-1.96 hours
Standard Error 0.251
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 6
|
-0.76 hours
Standard Error 0.246
|
-1.34 hours
Standard Error 0.303
|
-1.67 hours
Standard Error 0.296
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=272 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=178 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=187 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 1
|
-1.45 hours
Standard Error 0.261
|
-2.08 hours
Standard Error 0.322
|
-2.30 hours
Standard Error 0.315
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 2
|
-1.63 hours
Standard Error 0.269
|
-2.75 hours
Standard Error 0.327
|
-3.06 hours
Standard Error 0.330
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 3
|
-2.03 hours
Standard Error 0.274
|
-2.95 hours
Standard Error 0.336
|
-2.94 hours
Standard Error 0.333
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 4
|
-2.21 hours
Standard Error 0.285
|
-2.55 hours
Standard Error 0.353
|
-3.54 hours
Standard Error 0.324
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 5
|
-1.87 hours
Standard Error 0.284
|
-2.99 hours
Standard Error 0.340
|
-3.51 hours
Standard Error 0.334
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 6
|
-1.89 hours
Standard Error 0.306
|
-2.61 hours
Standard Error 0.368
|
-3.34 hours
Standard Error 0.336
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism \[working while sick\]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=235 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=145 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=143 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 1
|
-1.60 hours
Standard Error 0.623
|
-2.94 hours
Standard Error 0.793
|
-4.69 hours
Standard Error 0.798
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 2
|
-3.43 hours
Standard Error 0.621
|
-4.74 hours
Standard Error 0.790
|
-7.08 hours
Standard Error 0.792
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 3
|
-4.07 hours
Standard Error 0.633
|
-6.10 hours
Standard Error 0.799
|
-7.27 hours
Standard Error 0.801
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 4
|
-4.58 hours
Standard Error 0.629
|
-6.21 hours
Standard Error 0.774
|
-9.35 hours
Standard Error 0.764
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 5
|
-4.37 hours
Standard Error 0.618
|
-6.66 hours
Standard Error 0.747
|
-9.51 hours
Standard Error 0.753
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 6
|
-6.11 hours
Standard Error 0.692
|
-7.08 hours
Standard Error 0.869
|
-9.13 hours
Standard Error 0.845
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism \[working while sick\]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=266 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=175 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=185 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 1
|
-0.71 hours
Standard Error 0.266
|
-0.69 hours
Standard Error 0.327
|
-0.72 hours
Standard Error 0.319
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 2
|
-1.06 hours
Standard Error 0.247
|
-1.28 hours
Standard Error 0.301
|
-1.46 hours
Standard Error 0.305
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 3
|
-1.31 hours
Standard Error 0.318
|
-0.88 hours
Standard Error 0.392
|
-1.46 hours
Standard Error 0.392
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 4
|
-1.26 hours
Standard Error 0.308
|
-1.19 hours
Standard Error 0.383
|
-2.19 hours
Standard Error 0.353
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 5
|
-0.78 hours
Standard Error 0.406
|
-1.68 hours
Standard Error 0.488
|
-1.69 hours
Standard Error 0.482
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 6
|
-1.44 hours
Standard Error 0.318
|
-2.27 hours
Standard Error 0.383
|
-2.29 hours
Standard Error 0.351
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=239 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=150 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=146 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 1
|
-2.19 hours
Standard Error 0.686
|
-4.02 hours
Standard Error 0.865
|
-5.91 hours
Standard Error 0.875
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 2
|
-4.25 hours
Standard Error 0.674
|
-6.27 hours
Standard Error 0.856
|
-9.36 hours
Standard Error 0.854
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 3
|
-4.66 hours
Standard Error 0.708
|
-7.31 hours
Standard Error 0.891
|
-9.30 hours
Standard Error 0.886
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 4
|
-4.87 hours
Standard Error 0.721
|
-7.58 hours
Standard Error 0.879
|
-11.14 hours
Standard Error 0.862
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 5
|
-5.32 hours
Standard Error 0.701
|
-7.81 hours
Standard Error 0.839
|
-11.15 hours
Standard Error 0.839
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 6
|
-6.73 hours
Standard Error 0.793
|
-8.01 hours
Standard Error 0.980
|
-10.70 hours
Standard Error 0.953
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=272 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=178 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=187 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 1
|
-2.18 hours
Standard Error 0.390
|
-2.78 hours
Standard Error 0.482
|
-2.89 hours
Standard Error 0.470
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 2
|
-2.71 hours
Standard Error 0.415
|
-4.04 hours
Standard Error 0.503
|
-4.48 hours
Standard Error 0.508
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 3
|
-3.37 hours
Standard Error 0.448
|
-3.84 hours
Standard Error 0.551
|
-4.34 hours
Standard Error 0.546
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 4
|
-3.46 hours
Standard Error 0.463
|
-3.77 hours
Standard Error 0.574
|
-5.64 hours
Standard Error 0.528
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 5
|
-2.62 hours
Standard Error 0.549
|
-4.67 hours
Standard Error 0.657
|
-5.16 hours
Standard Error 0.646
|
|
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 6
|
-3.30 hours
Standard Error 0.497
|
-4.89 hours
Standard Error 0.598
|
-5.58 hours
Standard Error 0.546
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug.
This is assessed using Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=360 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=226 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=229 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Baseline
|
99 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 1
|
93 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 2
|
72 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 3
|
54 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 4
|
62 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 5
|
56 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 6
|
39 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Overall
|
201 Participants
|
124 Participants
|
131 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Month 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Includes participants who were hospitalized during the Treatment Period.
This is assessed using HRUQ.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=16 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=12 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Days of Hospitalization
|
3.2 days
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
3.3 days
Standard Deviation 3.52
|
2.2 days
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Month 6 of Treatment PeriodPopulation: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug.
This is assessed using HRUQ.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=360 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=226 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=229 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Ultrasound
|
9 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Urine Test
|
8 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
All Categories
|
37 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Abdominal Hysterectomy
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Angiography
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Arthroscopy
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Biopsy
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Blood Draw
|
12 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Colposcopy
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Consultation
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
CT Scan
|
7 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Diagnostic Laparoscopy
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Electrocardiogram
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Endometrial Ablation
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Histological Exam
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Intrauterine Insemination
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
In Vitro Fertilization
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Laparotomy
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Oophorectomy
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Pelvic Exam
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Physical Examination
|
18 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Surgery for Adhesions
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Therapeutic Laparoscopy
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Transfusion
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Vaginal Hysterectomy
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
X-Ray
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Other (Not Specified)
|
13 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Elagolix 150 mg QD
Elagolix 200 mg BID
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=360 participants at risk
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=226 participants at risk
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=229 participants at risk
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
|
0.83%
3/360 • Number of events 3 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.88%
2/226 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
FREQUENT BOWEL MOVEMENTS
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
LARGE INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
ABSCESS ORAL
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
APPENDICITIS
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.87%
2/229 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
PHARYNGEAL ABSCESS
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
POSTOPERATIVE ABSCESS
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LIGAMENT SPRAIN
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
PROCEDURAL PAIN
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.88%
2/226 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROTRUSION
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
JAW CYST
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
DIZZINESS
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
LUMBAR RADICULOPATHY
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
SYNCOPE
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
ABORTION SPONTANEOUS
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
ABORTION SPONTANEOUS COMPLETE
|
0.56%
2/360 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
COMPLETED SUICIDE
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL COLIC
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
ENDOMETRIOSIS
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.88%
2/226 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MENORRHAGIA
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
PELVIC PAIN
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
PERINEAL PAIN
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
UTERINE POLYP
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.88%
2/226 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
VAGINAL HAEMORRHAGE
|
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
ABORTION INDUCED
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Vascular disorders
BLOOD PRESSURE FLUCTUATION
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=360 participants at risk
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=226 participants at risk
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=229 participants at risk
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
|
5.0%
18/360 • Number of events 18 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
3.5%
8/226 • Number of events 8 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
4.8%
11/229 • Number of events 11 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
|
11.1%
40/360 • Number of events 40 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
11.5%
26/226 • Number of events 26 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
15.7%
36/229 • Number of events 36 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
NASOPHARYNGITIS
|
5.8%
21/360 • Number of events 21 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
6.6%
15/226 • Number of events 15 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
7.0%
16/229 • Number of events 16 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
SINUSITIS
|
3.9%
14/360 • Number of events 14 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
4.4%
10/226 • Number of events 10 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
6.6%
15/229 • Number of events 15 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
|
4.4%
16/360 • Number of events 16 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
4.9%
11/226 • Number of events 11 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
5.2%
12/229 • Number of events 12 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
|
7.2%
26/360 • Number of events 26 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
4.4%
10/226 • Number of events 10 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
8.3%
19/229 • Number of events 19 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
|
3.1%
11/360 • Number of events 11 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
3.1%
7/226 • Number of events 7 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
7.0%
16/229 • Number of events 16 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
|
4.2%
15/360 • Number of events 15 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
3.5%
8/226 • Number of events 8 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
5.7%
13/229 • Number of events 13 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
|
13.9%
50/360 • Number of events 50 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
18.6%
42/226 • Number of events 42 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
22.7%
52/229 • Number of events 52 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
INSOMNIA
|
3.3%
12/360 • Number of events 12 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
5.8%
13/226 • Number of events 13 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
10.5%
24/229 • Number of events 24 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
MOOD SWINGS
|
2.2%
8/360 • Number of events 8 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
5.8%
13/226 • Number of events 13 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
2.6%
6/229 • Number of events 6 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
AMENORRHOEA
|
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
4.9%
11/226 • Number of events 11 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
8.7%
20/229 • Number of events 20 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
|
Vascular disorders
HOT FLUSH
|
10.3%
37/360 • Number of events 37 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
22.6%
51/226 • Number of events 51 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
47.6%
109/229 • Number of events 109 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee AbbVie requests that any investigator or institution that plans on presenting/publishing results disclosure, provide written notification of their request 60 days prior to their presentation/publication. AbbVie requests that no presentation/publication will be instituted until 12 months after a study is completed, or after the first presentation/publication whichever occurs first. A delay may be proposed of a presentation/publication if AbbVie needs to secure patent or proprietary protection.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER