Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Global Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain (NCT NCT01931670)

NCT ID: NCT01931670

Last Updated: 2018-09-07

Results Overview

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.85 or greater from Baseline in DYS pain as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

815 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At Month 3 of the Treatment Period

Results posted on

2018-09-07

Participant Flow

Participants were randomized at 187 sites in Argentina, Austria, Australia, Brazil, Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, South Africa, Spain, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

The study consisted of 4 periods: a Washout Period (if applicable); a Screening Period of ≤ 100 days prior to first dose; a 6-month Treatment Period; and a Post-Treatment Follow-up Period of ≤ 12 months (if applicable). Participants were randomized into the study in a 3:2:2 ratio to placebo, elagolix 150 mg QD, or elagolix 200 mg BID, respectively.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
Placebo twice daily (BID) for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
Elagolix 150 mg once daily (QD) for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Treatment Period
STARTED
360
226
229
Treatment Period
COMPLETED
270
178
184
Treatment Period
NOT COMPLETED
90
48
45
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
STARTED
61
40
54
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Completed PTFU Month 6
42
24
18
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Completed PTFU Month 12
0
4
15
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
COMPLETED
42
28
33
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
NOT COMPLETED
19
12
21

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
Placebo twice daily (BID) for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
Elagolix 150 mg once daily (QD) for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Treatment Period
Exclusionary Medication Received
1
1
1
Treatment Period
Surgery/Invasive Intervention
4
2
0
Treatment Period
Subject Noncompliant
4
9
5
Treatment Period
Adverse Event
19
8
21
Treatment Period
Lack of Efficacy
11
2
2
Treatment Period
Pregnancy
7
2
0
Treatment Period
Other
8
7
2
Treatment Period
Consent Withdrawn by Subject
17
12
7
Treatment Period
Lost to Follow-up
19
5
7
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Exclusionary Medication Received
3
0
0
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Adverse Event
0
2
1
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Surgery/Invasive Intervention
4
4
2
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Other
6
3
3
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Consent Withdrawn by Subject
6
3
13
Post-Treatment Follow-Up (PTFU) Period
Lost to Follow-up
0
0
2

Baseline Characteristics

A Global Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=360 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=226 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=229 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Total
n=815 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.69 • n=5 Participants
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.80 • n=7 Participants
33.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.67 • n=5 Participants
33.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.71 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
360 Participants
n=5 Participants
226 Participants
n=7 Participants
229 Participants
n=5 Participants
815 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At Month 3 of the Treatment Period

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set; all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Population included mITT participants who either had data during the Month 3 35-day window or who prematurely discontinued prior to or at Month 3 and met the rules for last observation carried forward.

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.85 or greater from Baseline in DYS pain as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=353 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Dysmenorrhea (DYS)
22.7 percentage of participants
43.4 percentage of participants
72.4 percentage of participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At Month 3 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set; all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Population included mITT participants who either had data during the Month 3 35-day window or who prematurely discontinued prior to or at Month 3 and met the rules for last observation carried forward.

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.43 or greater from Baseline in NMPP as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=353 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Month 3 Based on Daily Assessment of Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP)
36.5 percentage of participants
49.8 percentage of participants
57.8 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of the Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=312 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=204 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=209 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Scores
-1.33 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.097
-1.90 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.122
-2.55 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.122

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=273 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=185 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=187 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in DYS
-0.52 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
-1.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.057
-1.65 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.057

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=273 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=185 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=187 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in NMPP
-0.48 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.035
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
-0.80 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 or 550 mg), and one country-specific narcotic analgesic (5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen). Assessment was based on average pill counts.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=312 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=204 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=209 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
-0.31 number of pills
Standard Error 0.028
-0.36 number of pills
Standard Error 0.035
-0.49 number of pills
Standard Error 0.034

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 or 550 mg), and one country-specific narcotic analgesic (5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen). Assessment was based on average pill counts.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=273 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=185 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=187 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
-0.32 number of pills
Standard Error 0.030
-0.40 number of pills
Standard Error 0.038
-0.52 number of pills
Standard Error 0.037

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants who responded "not applicable" for the entire time point and at Baseline are excluded from the analysis.

The DYSP pain scale ranges from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=145 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=150 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Dyspareunia (DYSP)
-0.30 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.052
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.052

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.

Permitted country-specific rescue narcotic analgesics included 5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen. Assessment was based on average pill counts.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=312 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=204 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=209 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Use of Narcotic Class of Medication (Opioids)
-0.12 number of pills
Standard Error 0.019
-0.12 number of pills
Standard Error 0.024
-0.21 number of pills
Standard Error 0.023

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of the Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Last observation carried forward. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.85 or greater from Baseline in DYS pain as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS
Month 1
17.3 percentage of participants
33.0 percentage of participants
46.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS
Month 2
19.0 percentage of participants
39.4 percentage of participants
69.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS
Month 4
21.2 percentage of participants
45.9 percentage of participants
79.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS
Month 5
23.7 percentage of participants
44.1 percentage of participants
80.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in DYS
Month 6
25.4 percentage of participants
46.2 percentage of participants
76.9 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of the Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Last observation carried forward. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.43 or greater from Baseline in NMPP as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP
Month 1
23.5 percentage of participants
27.6 percentage of participants
29.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP
Month 2
32.1 percentage of participants
39.8 percentage of participants
50.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP
Month 4
38.7 percentage of participants
51.4 percentage of participants
63.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP
Month 5
39.8 percentage of participants
50.5 percentage of participants
63.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders for Each Month, Except Month 3, in NMPP
Month 6
40.6 percentage of participants
51.6 percentage of participants
62.2 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Last observation carried forward. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) as recorded in a daily electronic diary. The criteria for defining a participant as a responder included a reduction of -0.29 or greater from Baseline in DYSP as well as no increased rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=168 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=171 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 1
33.3 percentage of participants
33.8 percentage of participants
35.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 2
33.2 percentage of participants
39.9 percentage of participants
47.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 3
39.5 percentage of participants
44.0 percentage of participants
53.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 4
38.5 percentage of participants
41.3 percentage of participants
59.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 5
37.4 percentage of participants
42.8 percentage of participants
58.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders at Each Month for DYSP
Month 6
39.4 percentage of participants
39.9 percentage of participants
55.8 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Prior to administering study drug), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 1
-0.33 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
-0.86 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
-1.11 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 2
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
-0.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.053
-1.67 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.053
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 3
-0.45 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
-0.97 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.053
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.052
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 4
-0.47 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.054
-1.74 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.054
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 5
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.045
-0.99 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.055
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.055

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The DYS pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=224 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 1
-14.36 percentage change
Standard Error 2.268
-39.67 percentage change
Standard Error 2.886
-53.68 percentage change
Standard Error 2.867
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 2
-17.36 percentage change
Standard Error 2.087
-39.26 percentage change
Standard Error 2.629
-80.68 percentage change
Standard Error 2.638
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 3
-20.58 percentage change
Standard Error 2.031
-45.73 percentage change
Standard Error 2.528
-82.52 percentage change
Standard Error 2.513
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 4
-21.55 percentage change
Standard Error 2.104
-48.52 percentage change
Standard Error 2.601
-83.92 percentage change
Standard Error 2.599
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 5
-22.63 percentage change
Standard Error 2.159
-45.99 percentage change
Standard Error 2.664
-85.53 percentage change
Standard Error 2.650
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in Mean Pain Score for DYS
Month 6
-23.81 percentage change
Standard Error 2.225
-49.70 percentage change
Standard Error 2.738
-80.43 percentage change
Standard Error 2.727

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 1
-0.22 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.025
-0.24 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.031
-0.31 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.031
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 2
-0.34 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.027
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.034
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.034
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 3
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.031
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.039
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.039
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 4
-0.45 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.033
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.041
-0.78 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.041
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 6, in Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 5
-0.48 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.034
-0.58 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
-0.81 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The NMPP pain scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 1
-12.43 percentage change
Standard Deviation 1.814
-15.47 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.313
-18.86 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.288
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 2
-21.13 percentage change
Standard Deviation 1.836
-26.30 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.326
-34.32 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.316
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 3
-25.78 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.104
-32.63 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.643
-44.83 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.625
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 4
-29.94 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.170
-36.19 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.711
-51.52 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.696
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 5
-31.96 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.214
-38.17 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.756
-53.61 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.737
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month in the Mean Pain Score for NMPP
Month 6
-31.25 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.349
-42.09 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.914
-52.42 percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.897

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants who responded "not applicable" for the entire time point and at Baseline are excluded from the analysis. Participants with an assessment at given timepoint.

The DYSP pain scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=261 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=161 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=171 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP
Month 2
-0.25 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.038
-0.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
-0.49 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP
Month 1
-0.21 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.037
-0.19 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.046
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.045
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP
Month 4
-0.35 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.045
-0.40 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.055
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.055
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP
Month 5
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.046
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in the Mean Pain Score of DYSP
Month 6
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.049
-0.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.058
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.058

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 4, 5

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases.

Permitted rescue medications included the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen (500 or 550 mg), and one country-specific narcotic analgesic (5 mg hydrocodone + 300 or 325 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine + 500 mg acetaminophen, or 30 mg codeine, or 37.5 mg tramadol + 325 mg acetaminophen). Assessment was based on average pill counts.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Months 3 and 6, in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Month 1
-0.20 number of pills
Standard Error 0.024
-0.29 number of pills
Standard Error 0.031
-0.32 number of pills
Standard Error 0.031
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Months 3 and 6, in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Month 2
-0.25 number of pills
Standard Error 0.026
-0.32 number of pills
Standard Error 0.033
-0.44 number of pills
Standard Error 0.033
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Months 3 and 6, in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Month 4
-0.29 number of pills
Standard Error 0.028
-0.38 number of pills
Standard Error 0.035
-0.51 number of pills
Standard Error 0.035
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Months 3 and 6, in Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics
Month 5
-0.32 number of pills
Standard Error 0.030
-0.37 number of pills
Standard Error 0.038
-0.54 number of pills
Standard Error 0.038

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Last observation carried forward. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The PGIC questionnaire is a self-reported 7-point scale rating a participant's overall impression of change from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Participants evaluated the change in their endometriosis-associated pain since initiation of study drug.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=337 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=214 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=215 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 1
3.49 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.062
3.12 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.078
2.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.077
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 2
3.24 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.063
2.62 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.079
2.15 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.079
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 3
3.16 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.066
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
2.02 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 4
3.19 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.068
2.56 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 5
3.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.070
2.43 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Month 6
3.22 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.073
2.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.090
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.091

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=358 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=221 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=225 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores
Month 1
-0.78 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.074
-1.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.094
-1.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.093
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores
Month 2
-1.08 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.085
-1.62 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.108
-2.04 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.107
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores
Month 4
-1.49 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.102
-2.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.128
-2.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.128
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores
Month 5
-1.58 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.105
-2.19 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.131
-2.95 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.131
Change From Baseline to Each Month, Except Month 3, in NRS Scores
Month 6
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.110
-2.28 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.137
-2.87 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.136

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=331 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=213 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=213 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Pain Domain of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Questionnaire Scores
Month 1
-15.20 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.971
-19.40 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.210
-22.75 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.211
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Pain Domain of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Questionnaire Scores
Month 3
-19.29 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.103
-26.62 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.349
-34.72 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.360
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Pain Domain of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Questionnaire Scores
Month 6
-19.53 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.340
-28.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.601
-36.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.572

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=226 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=150 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=155 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of EHP-30 Questionnaire Scores
Month 1
-9.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.229
-10.46 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.510
-14.29 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.484
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of EHP-30 Questionnaire Scores
Month 3
-14.51 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.502
-17.26 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.895
-25.20 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.848
Change From Baseline to Each Scheduled Assessment in the Sexual Intercourse Domain of EHP-30 Questionnaire Scores
Month 6
-14.14 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.891
-17.07 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.215
-28.24 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.095

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=239 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=150 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=146 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 1
-0.61 hours
Standard Error 0.267
-1.62 hours
Standard Error 0.336
-1.56 hours
Standard Error 0.341
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 2
-0.82 hours
Standard Error 0.246
-1.80 hours
Standard Error 0.312
-2.25 hours
Standard Error 0.312
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 3
-0.76 hours
Standard Error 0.268
-1.43 hours
Standard Error 0.338
-2.17 hours
Standard Error 0.336
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 4
-0.55 hours
Standard Error 0.355
-1.81 hours
Standard Error 0.434
-2.03 hours
Standard Error 0.426
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 5
-0.85 hours
Standard Error 0.209
-1.58 hours
Standard Error 0.251
-1.96 hours
Standard Error 0.251
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Absenteeism
Month 6
-0.76 hours
Standard Error 0.246
-1.34 hours
Standard Error 0.303
-1.67 hours
Standard Error 0.296

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=272 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=178 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=187 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 1
-1.45 hours
Standard Error 0.261
-2.08 hours
Standard Error 0.322
-2.30 hours
Standard Error 0.315
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 2
-1.63 hours
Standard Error 0.269
-2.75 hours
Standard Error 0.327
-3.06 hours
Standard Error 0.330
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 3
-2.03 hours
Standard Error 0.274
-2.95 hours
Standard Error 0.336
-2.94 hours
Standard Error 0.333
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 4
-2.21 hours
Standard Error 0.285
-2.55 hours
Standard Error 0.353
-3.54 hours
Standard Error 0.324
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 5
-1.87 hours
Standard Error 0.284
-2.99 hours
Standard Error 0.340
-3.51 hours
Standard Error 0.334
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Absenteeism
Month 6
-1.89 hours
Standard Error 0.306
-2.61 hours
Standard Error 0.368
-3.34 hours
Standard Error 0.336

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to presenteeism \[working while sick\]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=235 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=145 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=143 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 1
-1.60 hours
Standard Error 0.623
-2.94 hours
Standard Error 0.793
-4.69 hours
Standard Error 0.798
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 2
-3.43 hours
Standard Error 0.621
-4.74 hours
Standard Error 0.790
-7.08 hours
Standard Error 0.792
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 3
-4.07 hours
Standard Error 0.633
-6.10 hours
Standard Error 0.799
-7.27 hours
Standard Error 0.801
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 4
-4.58 hours
Standard Error 0.629
-6.21 hours
Standard Error 0.774
-9.35 hours
Standard Error 0.764
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 5
-4.37 hours
Standard Error 0.618
-6.66 hours
Standard Error 0.747
-9.51 hours
Standard Error 0.753
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace Due to Presenteeism
Month 6
-6.11 hours
Standard Error 0.692
-7.08 hours
Standard Error 0.869
-9.13 hours
Standard Error 0.845

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to presenteeism \[working while sick\]) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=266 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=175 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=185 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 1
-0.71 hours
Standard Error 0.266
-0.69 hours
Standard Error 0.327
-0.72 hours
Standard Error 0.319
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 2
-1.06 hours
Standard Error 0.247
-1.28 hours
Standard Error 0.301
-1.46 hours
Standard Error 0.305
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 3
-1.31 hours
Standard Error 0.318
-0.88 hours
Standard Error 0.392
-1.46 hours
Standard Error 0.392
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 4
-1.26 hours
Standard Error 0.308
-1.19 hours
Standard Error 0.383
-2.19 hours
Standard Error 0.353
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 5
-0.78 hours
Standard Error 0.406
-1.68 hours
Standard Error 0.488
-1.69 hours
Standard Error 0.482
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household Due to Presenteeism
Month 6
-1.44 hours
Standard Error 0.318
-2.27 hours
Standard Error 0.383
-2.29 hours
Standard Error 0.351

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the workplace due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=239 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=150 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=146 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 1
-2.19 hours
Standard Error 0.686
-4.02 hours
Standard Error 0.865
-5.91 hours
Standard Error 0.875
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 2
-4.25 hours
Standard Error 0.674
-6.27 hours
Standard Error 0.856
-9.36 hours
Standard Error 0.854
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 3
-4.66 hours
Standard Error 0.708
-7.31 hours
Standard Error 0.891
-9.30 hours
Standard Error 0.886
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 4
-4.87 hours
Standard Error 0.721
-7.58 hours
Standard Error 0.879
-11.14 hours
Standard Error 0.862
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 5
-5.32 hours
Standard Error 0.701
-7.81 hours
Standard Error 0.839
-11.15 hours
Standard Error 0.839
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Workplace
Month 6
-6.73 hours
Standard Error 0.793
-8.01 hours
Standard Error 0.980
-10.70 hours
Standard Error 0.953

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Observed cases. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

The HRPQ consists of questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity (number of work hours lost from the household due to absenteeism and presenteeism) in the 7 days prior to survey administration.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=272 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=178 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=187 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 1
-2.18 hours
Standard Error 0.390
-2.78 hours
Standard Error 0.482
-2.89 hours
Standard Error 0.470
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 2
-2.71 hours
Standard Error 0.415
-4.04 hours
Standard Error 0.503
-4.48 hours
Standard Error 0.508
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 3
-3.37 hours
Standard Error 0.448
-3.84 hours
Standard Error 0.551
-4.34 hours
Standard Error 0.546
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 4
-3.46 hours
Standard Error 0.463
-3.77 hours
Standard Error 0.574
-5.64 hours
Standard Error 0.528
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 5
-2.62 hours
Standard Error 0.549
-4.67 hours
Standard Error 0.657
-5.16 hours
Standard Error 0.646
Change From Baseline to Each Month in HRPQ: Total (Absenteeism and Presenteeism) Number of Hours of Work Lost From Household
Month 6
-3.30 hours
Standard Error 0.497
-4.89 hours
Standard Error 0.598
-5.58 hours
Standard Error 0.546

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug.

This is assessed using Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=360 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=226 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=229 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Baseline
99 Participants
53 Participants
57 Participants
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 1
93 Participants
47 Participants
54 Participants
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 2
72 Participants
42 Participants
43 Participants
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 3
54 Participants
46 Participants
40 Participants
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 4
62 Participants
39 Participants
43 Participants
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 5
56 Participants
31 Participants
30 Participants
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Month 6
39 Participants
27 Participants
25 Participants
Number of Participants With Endometriosis-Related Non-Study Health Visits During the Treatment Period
Overall
201 Participants
124 Participants
131 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Month 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug. Includes participants who were hospitalized during the Treatment Period.

This is assessed using HRUQ.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=16 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=12 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Number of Days of Hospitalization
3.2 days
Standard Deviation 2.18
3.3 days
Standard Deviation 3.52
2.2 days
Standard Deviation 1.27

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Month 6 of Treatment Period

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug.

This is assessed using HRUQ.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=360 Participants
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=226 Participants
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=229 Participants
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Ultrasound
9 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Urine Test
8 Participants
7 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
All Categories
37 Participants
28 Participants
22 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Abdominal Hysterectomy
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Angiography
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Arthroscopy
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Biopsy
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Blood Draw
12 Participants
13 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Colposcopy
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Consultation
1 Participants
5 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
CT Scan
7 Participants
10 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Diagnostic Laparoscopy
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Electrocardiogram
4 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Endometrial Ablation
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Histological Exam
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Intrauterine Insemination
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
In Vitro Fertilization
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Laparotomy
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
0 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Oophorectomy
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Pelvic Exam
3 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Physical Examination
18 Participants
16 Participants
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Surgery for Adhesions
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Therapeutic Laparoscopy
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Transfusion
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Vaginal Hysterectomy
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
X-Ray
12 Participants
11 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures During the Treatment Period, by Type
Other (Not Specified)
13 Participants
4 Participants
4 Participants

Adverse Events

Placebo

Serious events: 12 serious events
Other events: 158 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Elagolix 150 mg QD

Serious events: 12 serious events
Other events: 128 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Elagolix 200 mg BID

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 162 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=360 participants at risk
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=226 participants at risk
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=229 participants at risk
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
0.83%
3/360 • Number of events 3 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.88%
2/226 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
FREQUENT BOWEL MOVEMENTS
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
LARGE INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
ABSCESS ORAL
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
APPENDICITIS
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.87%
2/229 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
PHARYNGEAL ABSCESS
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
POSTOPERATIVE ABSCESS
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LIGAMENT SPRAIN
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
PROCEDURAL PAIN
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.88%
2/226 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROTRUSION
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
JAW CYST
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
DIZZINESS
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
LUMBAR RADICULOPATHY
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
SYNCOPE
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
ABORTION SPONTANEOUS
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
ABORTION SPONTANEOUS COMPLETE
0.56%
2/360 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Psychiatric disorders
COMPLETED SUICIDE
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL COLIC
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
ENDOMETRIOSIS
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.88%
2/226 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MENORRHAGIA
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
PELVIC PAIN
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
PERINEAL PAIN
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
UTERINE POLYP
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.88%
2/226 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
VAGINAL HAEMORRHAGE
0.00%
0/360 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Surgical and medical procedures
ABORTION INDUCED
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.44%
1/226 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Vascular disorders
BLOOD PRESSURE FLUCTUATION
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/226 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/229 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=360 participants at risk
Placebo BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 150 mg QD
n=226 participants at risk
Elagolix 150 mg QD for the 6-month Treatment Period
Elagolix 200 mg BID
n=229 participants at risk
Elagolix 200 mg BID for the 6-month Treatment Period
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
5.0%
18/360 • Number of events 18 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
3.5%
8/226 • Number of events 8 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
4.8%
11/229 • Number of events 11 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
11.1%
40/360 • Number of events 40 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
11.5%
26/226 • Number of events 26 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
15.7%
36/229 • Number of events 36 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
NASOPHARYNGITIS
5.8%
21/360 • Number of events 21 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
6.6%
15/226 • Number of events 15 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
7.0%
16/229 • Number of events 16 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
SINUSITIS
3.9%
14/360 • Number of events 14 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
4.4%
10/226 • Number of events 10 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
6.6%
15/229 • Number of events 15 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
4.4%
16/360 • Number of events 16 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
4.9%
11/226 • Number of events 11 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
5.2%
12/229 • Number of events 12 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
7.2%
26/360 • Number of events 26 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
4.4%
10/226 • Number of events 10 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
8.3%
19/229 • Number of events 19 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
3.1%
11/360 • Number of events 11 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
3.1%
7/226 • Number of events 7 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
7.0%
16/229 • Number of events 16 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
4.2%
15/360 • Number of events 15 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
3.5%
8/226 • Number of events 8 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
5.7%
13/229 • Number of events 13 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
13.9%
50/360 • Number of events 50 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
18.6%
42/226 • Number of events 42 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
22.7%
52/229 • Number of events 52 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Psychiatric disorders
INSOMNIA
3.3%
12/360 • Number of events 12 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
5.8%
13/226 • Number of events 13 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
10.5%
24/229 • Number of events 24 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Psychiatric disorders
MOOD SWINGS
2.2%
8/360 • Number of events 8 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
5.8%
13/226 • Number of events 13 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
2.6%
6/229 • Number of events 6 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
AMENORRHOEA
0.28%
1/360 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
4.9%
11/226 • Number of events 11 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
8.7%
20/229 • Number of events 20 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
Vascular disorders
HOT FLUSH
10.3%
37/360 • Number of events 37 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
22.6%
51/226 • Number of events 51 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.
47.6%
109/229 • Number of events 109 • From first dose of study treatment through 6 months of treatment plus up to 12 months of follow-up.

Additional Information

Global Medical Services

AbbVie

Phone: 800-633-9110

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee AbbVie requests that any investigator or institution that plans on presenting/publishing results disclosure, provide written notification of their request 60 days prior to their presentation/publication. AbbVie requests that no presentation/publication will be instituted until 12 months after a study is completed, or after the first presentation/publication whichever occurs first. A delay may be proposed of a presentation/publication if AbbVie needs to secure patent or proprietary protection.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER